Re: [arch-dev-public] status of csup
2007/10/23, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com>:
Hm, csup is like another candidate for base-devel - required by abs. abs can also work with cvsup but we're going to dump it anyway because it's non-portable. It's only 49,6K, dependencies are gcc, zlib and openssl (all in Core). gcc dependency should be changed to gcc-libs, of course. What do you think? -- Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич)
On 10/24/07, Roman Kyrylych <roman.kyrylych@gmail.com> wrote:
Feel free to commit the change to CVS to change that dependency from gcc to gcc-libs, even if you don't do a rebuild. Second, if we do move it, we should dump cvsup, not flounder around with what we are doing now. But the reasons against moving it (and I hate to say it) is that we may not continue to use CVS so its use will no longer be necessary. -Dan
On 10/24/07, Dan McGee <dpmcgee@gmail.com> wrote:
Agreed. I'm tagging this in my todo list. If no one gets to it before tonight, I will do it. Any problems with csup replaces=(cvsup) and dumping cvsup?
participants (3)
-
Aaron Griffin
-
Dan McGee
-
Roman Kyrylych