[arch-dev-public] [signoff] bash 3.2.048
Package in testing for x86_64. An i686 build would be appreciated. Bug fixes: FS#10073: /etc/skel/.bashrc addition for non-interactive shells Patch level bump to 048. Mostly minor changes, see here for patches: http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/bash/bash-3.2-patches/ Please signoff
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 1:06 AM, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
Package in testing for x86_64. An i686 build would be appreciated.
Bug fixes: FS#10073: /etc/skel/.bashrc addition for non-interactive shells
Patch level bump to 048. Mostly minor changes, see here for patches: http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/bash/bash-3.2-patches/
Please signoff
I think the x86_64 build is still in your staging dir. Ronald
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 1:34 AM, Ronald van Haren <pressh@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 1:06 AM, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
Package in testing for x86_64. An i686 build would be appreciated.
Bug fixes: FS#10073: /etc/skel/.bashrc addition for non-interactive shells
Patch level bump to 048. Mostly minor changes, see here for patches: http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/bash/bash-3.2-patches/
Please signoff
I think the x86_64 build is still in your staging dir.
Ronald
i686 is up in testing btw Ronald
Ronald van Haren wrote:
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 1:34 AM, Ronald van Haren <pressh@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 1:06 AM, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
Package in testing for x86_64. An i686 build would be appreciated.
Bug fixes: FS#10073: /etc/skel/.bashrc addition for non-interactive shells
Patch level bump to 048. Mostly minor changes, see here for patches: http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/bash/bash-3.2-patches/
Please signoff
I think the x86_64 build is still in your staging dir.
i686 is up in testing btw
Bash stuff still works here. Signoff i686 Allan
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 6:34 PM, Ronald van Haren <pressh@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 1:06 AM, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
Package in testing for x86_64. An i686 build would be appreciated.
Bug fixes: FS#10073: /etc/skel/.bashrc addition for non-interactive shells
Patch level bump to 048. Mostly minor changes, see here for patches: http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/bash/bash-3.2-patches/
Please signoff
I think the x86_64 build is still in your staging dir.
Whoops. FIxed now.
On Tue, 9 Dec 2008, Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 6:34 PM, Ronald van Haren <pressh@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 1:06 AM, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
Package in testing for x86_64. An i686 build would be appreciated.
Bug fixes: FS#10073: /etc/skel/.bashrc addition for non-interactive shells
Patch level bump to 048. Mostly minor changes, see here for patches: http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/bash/bash-3.2-patches/
Please signoff
I think the x86_64 build is still in your staging dir.
Whoops. FIxed now.
signoff both arches -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Eric Bélanger <belanger@astro.umontreal.ca> wrote:
On Tue, 9 Dec 2008, Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 6:34 PM, Ronald van Haren <pressh@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 1:06 AM, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
Package in testing for x86_64. An i686 build would be appreciated.
Bug fixes: FS#10073: /etc/skel/.bashrc addition for non-interactive shells
Patch level bump to 048. Mostly minor changes, see here for patches: http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/bash/bash-3.2-patches/
Please signoff
I think the x86_64 build is still in your staging dir.
Whoops. FIxed now.
signoff both arches
I just upgraded to this package now- did anyone else see this on upgrading? checking package integrity... (1/1) checking for file conflicts [#####################] 100% (1/1) upgrading bash [#####################] 100% error: scriptlet failed to execute correctly -Dan
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008, Dan McGee wrote:
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Eric Bélanger <belanger@astro.umontreal.ca> wrote:
On Tue, 9 Dec 2008, Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 6:34 PM, Ronald van Haren <pressh@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 1:06 AM, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
Package in testing for x86_64. An i686 build would be appreciated.
Bug fixes: FS#10073: /etc/skel/.bashrc addition for non-interactive shells
Patch level bump to 048. Mostly minor changes, see here for patches: http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/bash/bash-3.2-patches/
Please signoff
I think the x86_64 build is still in your staging dir.
Whoops. FIxed now.
signoff both arches
I just upgraded to this package now- did anyone else see this on upgrading?
checking package integrity... (1/1) checking for file conflicts [#####################] 100% (1/1) upgrading bash [#####################] 100% error: scriptlet failed to execute correctly
-Dan
I don't think I got that error. Eric -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Eric Bélanger wrote:
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008, Dan McGee wrote:
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Eric Bélanger <belanger@astro.umontreal.ca> wrote:
On Tue, 9 Dec 2008, Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 6:34 PM, Ronald van Haren <pressh@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 1:06 AM, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
Package in testing for x86_64. An i686 build would be appreciated.
Bug fixes: FS#10073: /etc/skel/.bashrc addition for non-interactive shells
Patch level bump to 048. Mostly minor changes, see here for patches: http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/bash/bash-3.2-patches/
Please signoff
I think the x86_64 build is still in your staging dir.
Whoops. FIxed now.
signoff both arches
I just upgraded to this package now- did anyone else see this on upgrading?
checking package integrity... (1/1) checking for file conflicts [#####################] 100% (1/1) upgrading bash [#####################] 100% error: scriptlet failed to execute correctly
-Dan
I don't think I got that error.
Eric
I definitely did not get that error. Allan
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 7:40 AM, Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org> wrote:
Eric Bélanger wrote:
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008, Dan McGee wrote:
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Eric Bélanger <belanger@astro.umontreal.ca> wrote:
On Tue, 9 Dec 2008, Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 6:34 PM, Ronald van Haren <pressh@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 1:06 AM, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote: > > Package in testing for x86_64. An i686 build would be appreciated. > > Bug fixes: > FS#10073: /etc/skel/.bashrc addition for non-interactive shells > > Patch level bump to 048. Mostly minor changes, see here for patches: > http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/bash/bash-3.2-patches/ > > Please signoff >
I think the x86_64 build is still in your staging dir.
Whoops. FIxed now.
signoff both arches
I just upgraded to this package now- did anyone else see this on upgrading?
checking package integrity... (1/1) checking for file conflicts [#####################] 100% (1/1) upgrading bash [#####################] 100% error: scriptlet failed to execute correctly
-Dan
I don't think I got that error.
Eric
I definitely did not get that error.
So I dug a bit deeper and tried to run the post_install() function manually without the /dev/null redirection: $ post_install install-info: No such file or directory for /usr/share/info/bash.info.gz $ ls /usr/share/info/bash.info /usr/share/info/bash.info Note the missing gz extension. If I list the contents of the package, the info file also doesn't have a gzip extension. -Dan
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 8:15 AM, Dan McGee <dpmcgee@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 7:40 AM, Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org> wrote:
Eric Bélanger wrote:
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008, Dan McGee wrote:
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Eric Bélanger <belanger@astro.umontreal.ca> wrote:
On Tue, 9 Dec 2008, Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 6:34 PM, Ronald van Haren <pressh@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 1:06 AM, Aaron Griffin > <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Package in testing for x86_64. An i686 build would be appreciated. >> >> Bug fixes: >> FS#10073: /etc/skel/.bashrc addition for non-interactive shells >> >> Patch level bump to 048. Mostly minor changes, see here for patches: >> http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/bash/bash-3.2-patches/ >> >> Please signoff >> > > I think the x86_64 build is still in your staging dir.
Whoops. FIxed now.
signoff both arches
I just upgraded to this package now- did anyone else see this on upgrading?
checking package integrity... (1/1) checking for file conflicts [#####################] 100% (1/1) upgrading bash [#####################] 100% error: scriptlet failed to execute correctly
-Dan
I don't think I got that error.
Eric
I definitely did not get that error.
So I dug a bit deeper and tried to run the post_install() function manually without the /dev/null redirection:
$ post_install install-info: No such file or directory for /usr/share/info/bash.info.gz
$ ls /usr/share/info/bash.info /usr/share/info/bash.info
Note the missing gz extension. If I list the contents of the package, the info file also doesn't have a gzip extension.
Is this an upgrade/merging issue? Doesn't zipman or whatever compress info files too?
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 4:25 PM, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 8:15 AM, Dan McGee <dpmcgee@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 7:40 AM, Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org> wrote:
Eric Bélanger wrote:
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008, Dan McGee wrote:
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Eric Bélanger <belanger@astro.umontreal.ca> wrote:
On Tue, 9 Dec 2008, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 6:34 PM, Ronald van Haren <pressh@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 1:06 AM, Aaron Griffin >> <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> Package in testing for x86_64. An i686 build would be appreciated. >>> >>> Bug fixes: >>> FS#10073: /etc/skel/.bashrc addition for non-interactive shells >>> >>> Patch level bump to 048. Mostly minor changes, see here for patches: >>> http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/bash/bash-3.2-patches/ >>> >>> Please signoff >>> >> >> I think the x86_64 build is still in your staging dir. > > Whoops. FIxed now. > >
signoff both arches
I just upgraded to this package now- did anyone else see this on upgrading?
checking package integrity... (1/1) checking for file conflicts [#####################] 100% (1/1) upgrading bash [#####################] 100% error: scriptlet failed to execute correctly
-Dan
I don't think I got that error.
Eric
I definitely did not get that error.
So I dug a bit deeper and tried to run the post_install() function manually without the /dev/null redirection:
$ post_install install-info: No such file or directory for /usr/share/info/bash.info.gz
$ ls /usr/share/info/bash.info /usr/share/info/bash.info
Note the missing gz extension. If I list the contents of the package, the info file also doesn't have a gzip extension.
Is this an upgrade/merging issue? Doesn't zipman or whatever compress info files too?
I believe pacman-git will, but 3.2.1 doesn't? Take a look at your makepkg script and see what it does. This is the git version: if [ "$(check_option zipman)" = "y" ]; then msg2 "$(gettext "Compressing man and info pages...")" local manpage mandirs ext file link hardlinks hl mandirs=({usr{,/local}{,/share},opt/*}/{man,info}) -Dan
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 4:34 PM, Dan McGee <dpmcgee@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 4:25 PM, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 8:15 AM, Dan McGee <dpmcgee@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 7:40 AM, Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org> wrote:
Eric Bélanger wrote:
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008, Dan McGee wrote:
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Eric Bélanger <belanger@astro.umontreal.ca> wrote: > > On Tue, 9 Dec 2008, Aaron Griffin wrote: > >> On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 6:34 PM, Ronald van Haren <pressh@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 1:06 AM, Aaron Griffin >>> <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Package in testing for x86_64. An i686 build would be appreciated. >>>> >>>> Bug fixes: >>>> FS#10073: /etc/skel/.bashrc addition for non-interactive shells >>>> >>>> Patch level bump to 048. Mostly minor changes, see here for patches: >>>> http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/bash/bash-3.2-patches/ >>>> >>>> Please signoff >>>> >>> >>> I think the x86_64 build is still in your staging dir. >> >> Whoops. FIxed now. >> >> > > signoff both arches
I just upgraded to this package now- did anyone else see this on upgrading?
checking package integrity... (1/1) checking for file conflicts [#####################] 100% (1/1) upgrading bash [#####################] 100% error: scriptlet failed to execute correctly
-Dan
I don't think I got that error.
Eric
I definitely did not get that error.
So I dug a bit deeper and tried to run the post_install() function manually without the /dev/null redirection:
$ post_install install-info: No such file or directory for /usr/share/info/bash.info.gz
$ ls /usr/share/info/bash.info /usr/share/info/bash.info
Note the missing gz extension. If I list the contents of the package, the info file also doesn't have a gzip extension.
Is this an upgrade/merging issue? Doesn't zipman or whatever compress info files too?
I believe pacman-git will, but 3.2.1 doesn't? Take a look at your makepkg script and see what it does. This is the git version:
if [ "$(check_option zipman)" = "y" ]; then msg2 "$(gettext "Compressing man and info pages...")" local manpage mandirs ext file link hardlinks hl mandirs=({usr{,/local}{,/share},opt/*}/{man,info})
Fixing, will upload a -2 shortly
participants (5)
-
Aaron Griffin
-
Allan McRae
-
Dan McGee
-
Eric Bélanger
-
Ronald van Haren