[arch-dev-public] thunderbird-i18n split again ...
See: http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-commits/2009-October/062928.html Giovanni, I hate to have to point fingers here, but before making such a change to somebody else's package, it should be discussed here. Now we have split the big package into many small ones - that's okay. But you neither provided a reasonable upgrade path, without any conflicts to the old package and so on. Such problems have to be considered before pushing such a package to extra, not after.
Thomas Bächler schrieb:
See: http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-commits/2009-October/062928.html
Giovanni, I hate to have to point fingers here, but before making such a change to somebody else's package, it should be discussed here. Now we have split the big package into many small ones - that's okay. But you neither provided a reasonable upgrade path, without any conflicts to the old package and so on. Such problems have to be considered before pushing such a package to extra, not after.
And the best thing is: It doesn't even work, thunderbird-de gives me an English thunderbird.
On 02/10/2009, Thomas Bächler <thomas@archlinux.org> wrote:
See: http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-commits/2009-October/062928.html
Giovanni, I hate to have to point fingers here, but before making such a change to somebody else's package, it should be discussed here. Now we have split the big package into many small ones - that's okay. But you neither provided a reasonable upgrade path, without any conflicts to the old package and so on. Such problems have to be considered before pushing such a package to extra, not after. It's completely MY fault. Sorry, I will fix packages tomorrow morning (0.30am here). Sorry again.
-- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer
Andrea Scarpino schrieb:
On 02/10/2009, Thomas Bächler <thomas@archlinux.org> wrote:
See: http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-commits/2009-October/062928.html
Giovanni, I hate to have to point fingers here, but before making such a change to somebody else's package, it should be discussed here. Now we have split the big package into many small ones - that's okay. But you neither provided a reasonable upgrade path, without any conflicts to the old package and so on. Such problems have to be considered before pushing such a package to extra, not after. It's completely MY fault. Sorry, I will fix packages tomorrow morning (0.30am here). Sorry again.
Oops, I am sorry. I thought I read Giovanni in the commits, but that one was yours. Well, I'll point the finger to you then. It was partially broken before: ALL .xpi files have to be in noextract=(...) for it to make sense. And they must be extracted all separately, otherwise they will all have the same (wrong) .manifest file.
On 02/10/2009, Thomas Bächler <thomas@archlinux.org> wrote:
It was partially broken before: ALL .xpi files have to be in noextract=(...) for it to make sense. And they must be extracted all separately, otherwise they will all have the same (wrong) .manifest file. Ok, fixed. What about "upgrade path"? Should I post an announce?
-- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer
Andrea Scarpino schrieb:
On 02/10/2009, Thomas Bächler <thomas@archlinux.org> wrote:
It was partially broken before: ALL .xpi files have to be in noextract=(...) for it to make sense. And they must be extracted all separately, otherwise they will all have the same (wrong) .manifest file. Ok, fixed. What about "upgrade path"? Should I post an announce?
We can't do much more I guess. At least the conflict should be there.
On 02/10/2009, Thomas Bächler <thomas@archlinux.org> wrote:
We can't do much more I guess. At least the conflict should be there. added conflicts to -3 and uploading they...I am opening a topic on forum.
-- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer
Andrea Scarpino schrieb:
On 02/10/2009, Thomas Bächler <thomas@archlinux.org> wrote:
We can't do much more I guess. At least the conflict should be there. added conflicts to -3 and uploading they...I am opening a topic on forum.
The packages are still broken, because they all use a wrong manifest file. But I already wrote that in a previous mail, please look at your original patch and see which code you deleted, then wonder why this code was there in the first place, and then do it right.
Thomas Bächler schrieb:
Andrea Scarpino schrieb:
On 02/10/2009, Thomas Bächler <thomas@archlinux.org> wrote:
We can't do much more I guess. At least the conflict should be there. added conflicts to -3 and uploading they...I am opening a topic on forum.
The packages are still broken, because they all use a wrong manifest file. But I already wrote that in a previous mail, please look at your original patch and see which code you deleted, then wonder why this code was there in the first place, and then do it right.
Take that back, I overlooked something again, it should be fine now.
On 02/10/2009, Thomas Bächler <thomas@archlinux.org> wrote:
The packages are still broken, because they all use a wrong manifest file. But I already wrote that in a previous mail, please look at your original patch and see which code you deleted, then wonder why this code was there in the first place, and then do it right. Are you sure you are talking about -3? I installed thunderbird-it here and it is in Italian.
-- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer
Andrea Scarpino schrieb:
On 02/10/2009, Thomas Bächler <thomas@archlinux.org> wrote:
The packages are still broken, because they all use a wrong manifest file. But I already wrote that in a previous mail, please look at your original patch and see which code you deleted, then wonder why this code was there in the first place, and then do it right. Are you sure you are talking about -3? I installed thunderbird-it here and it is in Italian.
See my last post, I seem to be reading only half of what is on my screen today.
On 02/10/2009, Thomas Bächler <thomas@archlinux.org> wrote:
See my last post, I seem to be reading only half of what is on my screen today. Luckily I am not the only one distracted today :) Packages look good, users warned. Goodnight!
-- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer
Thomas Bächler wrote:
Andrea Scarpino schrieb:
On 02/10/2009, Thomas Bächler <thomas@archlinux.org> wrote:
See my last post, I seem to be reading only half of what is on my screen today. Luckily I am not the only one distracted today :) Packages look good, users warned. Goodnight!
Good night to you too.
The pkgdesc's are still stupid....
pacman -Ss thunderbird extra/thunderbird 2.0.0.23-1 Standalone Mail/News reader extra/thunderbird-af 2.0.0.23-3 Language packs for Thunderbird extra/thunderbird-be 2.0.0.23-3 Language packs for Thunderbird extra/thunderbird-bg 2.0.0.23-3 Language packs for Thunderbird extra/thunderbird-ca 2.0.0.23-3 Language packs for Thunderbird extra/thunderbird-cs 2.0.0.23-3 Language packs for Thunderbird
2009/10/1, Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>:
The pkgdesc's are still stupid....
pacman -Ss thunderbird extra/thunderbird 2.0.0.23-1 Standalone Mail/News reader extra/thunderbird-af 2.0.0.23-3 Language packs for Thunderbird extra/thunderbird-be 2.0.0.23-3 Language packs for Thunderbird extra/thunderbird-bg 2.0.0.23-3 Language packs for Thunderbird extra/thunderbird-ca 2.0.0.23-3 Language packs for Thunderbird extra/thunderbird-cs 2.0.0.23-3 Language packs for Thunderbird
Andrea, you have to add an appropriate pkgdesc for all of the package_thunderbird-* functions. -- Arch Linux Developer http://www.archlinux.org http://www.archlinux.it
On 02/10/2009, Giovanni Scafora <giovanni@archlinux.org> wrote:
Andrea, you have to add an appropriate pkgdesc for all of the package_thunderbird-* functions. Yes I know...I only forgot they yesterday.
Added groups=('thunderbird-i18n') to -4 too. I am uploading they. -- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer
Andrea Scarpino wrote:
On 02/10/2009, Giovanni Scafora <giovanni@archlinux.org> wrote:
Andrea, you have to add an appropriate pkgdesc for all of the package_thunderbird-* functions.
Yes I know...I only forgot they yesterday.
Added groups=('thunderbird-i18n') to -4 too. I am uploading they.
As a hint for next time... when every package uses the same group and conflicts, just define it at the top of the PKGBUILD. Allan
Allan McRae schrieb:
The pkgdesc's are still stupid....
pacman -Ss thunderbird extra/thunderbird 2.0.0.23-1 Standalone Mail/News reader extra/thunderbird-af 2.0.0.23-3 Language packs for Thunderbird extra/thunderbird-be 2.0.0.23-3 Language packs for Thunderbird extra/thunderbird-bg 2.0.0.23-3 Language packs for Thunderbird extra/thunderbird-ca 2.0.0.23-3 Language packs for Thunderbird extra/thunderbird-cs 2.0.0.23-3 Language packs for Thunderbird
Didn't notice that, but at least they work now.
2009/10/1, Thomas Bächler <thomas@archlinux.org>:
See: http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-commits/2009-October/062928.html
Can you read Giovanni or Andrea? You should SEE before to write, not after: Author: andrea -- Arch Linux Developer http://www.archlinux.org http://www.archlinux.it
Giovanni Scafora schrieb:
2009/10/1, Thomas Bächler <thomas@archlinux.org>:
See: http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-commits/2009-October/062928.html
Can you read Giovanni or Andrea? You should SEE before to write, not after:
Author: andrea
Yeah, sorry, I was looking at http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-commits/2009-October/062933.html first, then burned a name into my brain. I already redirected my anger at Andrea.
participants (4)
-
Allan McRae
-
Andrea Scarpino
-
Giovanni Scafora
-
Thomas Bächler