[arch-dev-public] namcap status
Since I emailed out about devtools and pacbuild, here's the last email about namcap. Development on namcap is moving along nicely now that I've had help from Jesse Young and JJDaNiMoTh. I only have one thing left on my todo list related to namcap: updated licensepkg code. I want to actually inspect the packages and verify that they have the custom licenses distributed with them that they say they do. After I make that update, I plan on releasing namcap 2.0. Since namcap is hosted on projects now, where should the tarballs go? ftp/other or somewhere else? I don't think anyone's thought about this yet... Jason
Tuesday 02 October 2007, Jason Chu wrote: | I want to actually inspect the | packages and verify that they have the custom licenses distributed | with them that they say they do. | | After I make that update, I plan on releasing namcap 2.0. cool! - D -- .·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´ ° ° ° ° ° ° ><((((º> ° ° ° ° ° <º)))>< <º)))><
2007/10/2, Jason Chu <jason@archlinux.org>:
Since I emailed out about devtools and pacbuild, here's the last email about namcap.
Development on namcap is moving along nicely now that I've had help from Jesse Young and JJDaNiMoTh. I only have one thing left on my todo list related to namcap: updated licensepkg code. I want to actually inspect the packages and verify that they have the custom licenses distributed with them that they say they do.
After I make that update, I plan on releasing namcap 2.0.
Since namcap is hosted on projects now, where should the tarballs go? ftp/other or somewhere else? I don't think anyone's thought about this yet...
Good to see all these reports. I'd say ftp/other is a good place for all official tarballs. If we still have some sources in our http/~home - let's move them all to ftp/other too. -- Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич)
participants (3)
-
Damir Perisa
-
Jason Chu
-
Roman Kyrylych