Dan McGee wrote:

On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:

...

Tobias Powalowski schrieb:

...

Hi added a small fix to not break installation systems, please signoff both arches.

greetings tpowa

Signoff x86_64.

I think it is time to move the following packages: udev hal initscripts klibc klibc-udev klibc-kbd klibc-module-init-tools klibc-extras v86d

Any more related ones I forgot? Objections?

Sounds good to me, but don't forget a news item about the file conflicts.

Adding a bump for the packages list above. Is there something holding this move up? Allan

Am Mittwoch 24 September 2008 20:02:37 schrieb Thomas Bächler:

Any more related ones I forgot? Objections?

I did not notice any problems so far. -- Pierre Schmitz Clemens-August-Straße 76 53115 Bonn Telefon 0228 9716608 Mobil 0160 95269831 Jabber pierre@jabber.archlinux.de WWW http://www.archlinux.de

Aaron Griffin schrieb:

On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 7:17 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:

...

Hi added a small fix to not break installation systems, please signoff both arches.

Just curious as to what changed - the arch-commits diff only lists a change on the pkgrel.

http://repos.archlinux.org/viewvc.cgi/udev/trunk/udev.install?r1=12720&r2=12761 I wasn't thinking straight when I first wrote this post_install, so the one in -4 failed to create the /dev nodes from the installer. The one in -5 is tested in the following two scenarios: 1) mkdir -p /tmp/arch/{dev,var/lib/pacman} pacman -r /tmp/arch -Sy udev 2) mkdir -p /tmp/arch/{dev,var/lib/pacman} mount --bind /dev /tmp/arch/dev pacman -r /tmp/arch -Sy udev umount /tmp/arch/dev In both cases, /dev/{console,null,zero} are created properly, so moving this package to core will not break our FTP installer.