[arch-dev-public] python 2.6 rebuilds
Hi all, I am currently moving python-2.6 and the necessary rebuilds to [testing] for i686. The upgrade went nicely on my system with no breakages. Programs will issue warnings about depreciated modules (most noticeable to devs is svn and namcap) but these are nothing to worry about. I have a patch namcap that will will send to Jason after some more testing. I have done all the rebuilds for i686 except the openoffice packages which Andy will handle. I will do x86_64 builds on Sunday. Cheers, Allan
Am Wed, 22 Oct 2008 11:32:52 +1000 schrieb Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>:
Hi all,
I am currently moving python-2.6 and the necessary rebuilds to [testing] for i686. The upgrade went nicely on my system with no breakages. Programs will issue warnings about depreciated modules (most noticeable to devs is svn and namcap) but these are nothing to worry about. I have a patch namcap that will will send to Jason after some more testing.
I have done all the rebuilds for i686 except the openoffice packages which Andy will handle. I will do x86_64 builds on Sunday.
Cheers, Allan
i686 OOo rebuilds are done (stable and devel one). don't wait for openoffice-base-beta. that one is currently way "unmaintained". I will start using it soon for 3.0.1 prereleases. Don't take care of it. Nobody needs it right now. -Andy
Allan McRae wrote:
Hi all,
I am currently moving python-2.6 and the necessary rebuilds to [testing] for i686. The upgrade went nicely on my system with no breakages. Programs will issue warnings about depreciated modules (most noticeable to devs is svn and namcap) but these are nothing to worry about. I have a patch namcap that will will send to Jason after some more testing.
I have done all the rebuilds for i686 except the openoffice packages which Andy will handle. I will do x86_64 builds on Sunday.
Got to the x86_64 rebuilds earlier than expected. I'd appreciate it if someone can build koffice and wesnoth for me and for Andy to do the openoffice stuff. Thanks, Allan
On Fri, 24 Oct 2008, Allan McRae wrote:
Allan McRae wrote:
Hi all,
I am currently moving python-2.6 and the necessary rebuilds to [testing] for i686. The upgrade went nicely on my system with no breakages. Programs will issue warnings about depreciated modules (most noticeable to devs is svn and namcap) but these are nothing to worry about. I have a patch namcap that will will send to Jason after some more testing.
I have done all the rebuilds for i686 except the openoffice packages which Andy will handle. I will do x86_64 builds on Sunday.
Got to the x86_64 rebuilds earlier than expected. I'd appreciate it if someone can build koffice and wesnoth for me and for Andy to do the openoffice stuff.
Thanks, Allan
I'll rebuild koffice and wesnoth. Eric -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Am Fri, 24 Oct 2008 19:06:12 +1000 schrieb Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>:
Allan McRae wrote:
Hi all,
I am currently moving python-2.6 and the necessary rebuilds to [testing] for i686. The upgrade went nicely on my system with no breakages. Programs will issue warnings about depreciated modules (most noticeable to devs is svn and namcap) but these are nothing to worry about. I have a patch namcap that will will send to Jason after some more testing.
I have done all the rebuilds for i686 except the openoffice packages which Andy will handle. I will do x86_64 builds on Sunday.
Got to the x86_64 rebuilds earlier than expected. I'd appreciate it if someone can build koffice and wesnoth for me and for Andy to do the openoffice stuff.
Thanks, Allan
OOo is done for both arches. -Andy
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 3:37 AM, Andreas Radke <a.radke@arcor.de> wrote:
Am Fri, 24 Oct 2008 19:06:12 +1000 schrieb Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>:
Allan McRae wrote:
Hi all,
I am currently moving python-2.6 and the necessary rebuilds to [testing] for i686. The upgrade went nicely on my system with no breakages. Programs will issue warnings about depreciated modules (most noticeable to devs is svn and namcap) but these are nothing to worry about. I have a patch namcap that will will send to Jason after some more testing.
I have done all the rebuilds for i686 except the openoffice packages which Andy will handle. I will do x86_64 builds on Sunday.
Got to the x86_64 rebuilds earlier than expected. I'd appreciate it if someone can build koffice and wesnoth for me and for Andy to do the openoffice stuff.
Thanks, Allan
OOo is done for both arches.
Great work guys, as far as I can tell, everything seems to be working fine. I love these flawless things 8)
Hi all, It appears most of the python rebuilds are now done with the exception of vim/gvim (which I am waiting to here from Tobias K about), so can people run lddd on their systems and check for anything linking to libpython2.5.so.1.0. Also, give anything that has a python based plugin a bit of a test as these seem to the programs that I missing in the initial rebuilds and are hard to find without trying them all out... I am hoping that this can be moved over the weekend. Cheers, Allan
Am Dienstag 28 Oktober 2008 05:51:43 schrieb Allan McRae:
o can people run lddd on their systems and check for anything linking to libpython2.5.so.1.0.
All fine here; only found a package from [community]. -- Pierre Schmitz Clemens-August-Straße 76 53115 Bonn Telefon 0228 9716608 Mobil 0160 95269831 Jabber pierre@jabber.archlinux.de WWW http://www.archlinux.de
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
Am Dienstag 28 Oktober 2008 05:51:43 schrieb Allan McRae:
o can people run lddd on their systems and check for anything linking to libpython2.5.so.1.0.
All fine here; only found a package from [community].
FYI, totem-xine had to be rebuilt. I took care of it. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Eric Belanger wrote:
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
Am Dienstag 28 Oktober 2008 05:51:43 schrieb Allan McRae:
o can people run lddd on their systems and check for anything linking to libpython2.5.so.1.0.
All fine here; only found a package from [community].
FYI, totem-xine had to be rebuilt. I took care of it.
Everything that I knew needed rebuilt is now complete so I am intending to move to [extra] this on Saturday. I will start a separate sign-off thread for vi which is the only package in [core] that was rebuilt because of this. Allan
Am Donnerstag 30 Oktober 2008 05:29:16 schrieb Allan McRae:
Everything that I knew needed rebuilt is now complete
I think the boost package needs a rebuilt, too. I tested doing this myself but kdeedu wasn't able to make use of this boost.python. However, this is not critical. (only needed for scripting support in kig) -- Pierre Schmitz Clemens-August-Straße 76 53115 Bonn Telefon 0228 9716608 Mobil 0160 95269831 Jabber pierre@jabber.archlinux.de WWW http://www.archlinux.de
Pierre Schmitz wrote:
Am Donnerstag 30 Oktober 2008 05:29:16 schrieb Allan McRae:
Everything that I knew needed rebuilt is now complete
I think the boost package needs a rebuilt, too. I tested doing this myself but kdeedu wasn't able to make use of this boost.python. However, this is not critical. (only needed for scripting support in kig)
I will look into this but can you confirm that this worked with the previous python version? The Pyste module still imports fine and none of the boost libraries link to the old python library. Allan
Am Freitag 31 Oktober 2008 01:39:04 schrieb Allan McRae:
I will look into this but can you confirm that this worked with the previous python version? The Pyste module still imports fine and none of the boost libraries link to the old python library.
OK, I have found the problem. The cmake script of kdeedu checks for a python version up to 2.5. I will report this upstream. However: It does not hurt if boost installs files into /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/Pyste/? -- Pierre Schmitz Clemens-August-Straße 76 53115 Bonn Telefon 0228 9716608 Mobil 0160 95269831 Jabber pierre@jabber.archlinux.de WWW http://www.archlinux.de
Pierre Schmitz wrote:
Am Freitag 31 Oktober 2008 01:39:04 schrieb Allan McRae:
I will look into this but can you confirm that this worked with the previous python version? The Pyste module still imports fine and none of the boost libraries link to the old python library.
OK, I have found the problem. The cmake script of kdeedu checks for a python version up to 2.5. I will report this upstream.
However: It does not hurt if boost installs files into /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/Pyste/?
That is fine. I have added /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ to the python search patch for compatibility reasons and Pyste is the name of the module so everything works. Allan
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 9:51 PM, Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org> wrote:
Hi all,
It appears most of the python rebuilds are now done with the exception of vim/gvim (which I am waiting to here from Tobias K about), so can people run lddd on their systems and check for anything linking to libpython2.5.so.1.0. Also, give anything that has a python based plugin a bit of a test as these seem to the programs that I missing in the initial rebuilds and are hard to find without trying them all out...
I am hoping that this can be moved over the weekend.
Cheers, Allan
python-notify (from community) needs rebuilding. It contains a .so file that doesn't link to libpython2.5 but it's deployed in python2.5/site-packages/gtk-2.0/pynotify. Since python2.5/site-packages/gtk-2.0 is no longer a module, pynotify isn't importable. I tried to just build it myself and ran into an ld error. Jason
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 7:58 PM, Jason Chu <jason@archlinux.org> wrote:
python-notify (from community) needs rebuilding. It contains a .so file that doesn't link to libpython2.5 but it's deployed in python2.5/site-packages/gtk-2.0/pynotify. Since python2.5/site-packages/gtk-2.0 is no longer a module, pynotify isn't importable.
I tried to just build it myself and ran into an ld error.
python-notify builds fine here. Can you send me the error you got? -- Hugo
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 3:32 AM, Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org> wrote:
Hi all,
I am currently moving python-2.6 and the necessary rebuilds to [testing] for i686. The upgrade went nicely on my system with no breakages. Programs will issue warnings about depreciated modules (most noticeable to devs is svn and namcap) but these are nothing to worry about. I have a patch namcap that will will send to Jason after some more testing.
I have done all the rebuilds for i686 except the openoffice packages which Andy will handle. I will do x86_64 builds on Sunday.
Just a slight notice that rhythmbox needs a rebuild too.
participants (8)
-
Aaron Griffin
-
Allan McRae
-
Andreas Radke
-
Eric Belanger
-
Hugo Doria
-
Jason Chu
-
Pierre Schmitz
-
Xavier