[arch-dev-public] Signoff report for [testing]
=== Signoff report for [testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 13 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 13 fully signed off packages * 30 packages missing signoffs * 3 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [testing] in last 24 hours (13 total) == * mkinitcpio-0.8.1-1 (any) * linux-3.2-1 (i686) * linux-3.2-1 (x86_64) * fcpci-31107-66 (i686) * fcpcmcia-31107-62 (i686) * kmod-3-3 (i686) * lirc-1:0.9.0-9 (i686) * nvidia-290.10-2 (i686) * fcpci-31107-66 (x86_64) * fcpcmcia-31107-62 (x86_64) * kmod-3-3 (x86_64) * lirc-1:0.9.0-9 (x86_64) * nvidia-290.10-2 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [core] (6 total) == * mkinitcpio-0.8.1-1 (any) 1/2 signoffs * cryptsetup-1.4.1-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ed-1.6-1 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * openvpn-2.2.2-1 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * pacman-4.0.1-3 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * ed-1.6-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [extra] (24 total) == * claws-mail-extra-plugins-3.8.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cmake-2.8.7-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * fcpci-31107-66 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * fcpcmcia-31107-62 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gvfs-1.10.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * hydrogen-0.9.5-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * kdeutils-4.7.4-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * kmod-3-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * lirc-1:0.9.0-9 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * nvidia-290.10-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pulseaudio-1.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * totem-plparser-2.32.6-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * claws-mail-extra-plugins-3.8.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cmake-2.8.7-2 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * fcpci-31107-66 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fcpcmcia-31107-62 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gvfs-1.10.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * hydrogen-0.9.5-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * kdeutils-4.7.4-2 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * kmod-3-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * lirc-1:0.9.0-9 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * nvidia-290.10-2 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * pulseaudio-1.1-2 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * totem-plparser-2.32.6-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Completed signoffs (13 total) == * initscripts-2012.01.2-1 (any) * libarchive-3.0.2-1 (i686) * libpcap-1.2.1-1 (i686) * linux-3.2-1 (i686) * cryptsetup-1.4.1-1 (x86_64) * libarchive-3.0.2-1 (x86_64) * libpcap-1.2.1-1 (x86_64) * linux-3.2-1 (x86_64) * openvpn-2.2.2-1 (x86_64) * pacman-4.0.1-3 (x86_64) * namcap-3.2.1-1 (any) * pyalpm-0.5.3-1 (i686) * pyalpm-0.5.3-1 (x86_64) == All packages in [testing] for more than 14 days (3 total) == * pyalpm-0.5.3-1 (i686), since 2011-10-15 * pyalpm-0.5.3-1 (x86_64), since 2011-10-15 * namcap-3.2.1-1 (any), since 2011-10-20 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. eric - 10 signoffs 2. bpiotrowski - 5 signoffs 3. foutrelis - 3 signoffs 4. thomas - 1 signoffs 5. dreisner - 1 signoffs
Am 06.01.2012 10:07, schrieb Arch Website Notification:
=== Signoff report for [testing] ===
Can we get a time/date or similar in the subject of these messages?
== Incomplete signoffs for [core] (6 total) == * cryptsetup-1.4.1-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * openvpn-2.2.2-1 (i686) 1/2 signoffs
Does anyone use those? If not, I'll move them without signoffs.
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 11:23, Thomas Bächler <thomas@archlinux.org> wrote:
Am 06.01.2012 10:07, schrieb Arch Website Notification:
=== Signoff report for [testing] ===
Can we get a time/date or similar in the subject of these messages?
== Incomplete signoffs for [core] (6 total) == * cryptsetup-1.4.1-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * openvpn-2.2.2-1 (i686) 1/2 signoffs
Does anyone use those? If not, I'll move them without signoffs.
I use cryptsetup (root and 4 other partitions). Upgrade went fine. Signoff x86_64. -- Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич)
Am 06.01.2012 14:19, schrieb Roman Kyrylych:
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 11:23, Thomas Bächler <thomas@archlinux.org> wrote:
Am 06.01.2012 10:07, schrieb Arch Website Notification:
=== Signoff report for [testing] ===
Can we get a time/date or similar in the subject of these messages?
== Incomplete signoffs for [core] (6 total) == * cryptsetup-1.4.1-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * openvpn-2.2.2-1 (i686) 1/2 signoffs
Does anyone use those? If not, I'll move them without signoffs.
I use cryptsetup (root and 4 other partitions). Upgrade went fine. Signoff x86_64.
You see, the signoff report says that signoffs are lacking for i686 (as usual).
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 15:22, Thomas Bächler <thomas@archlinux.org> wrote:
You see, the signoff report says that signoffs are lacking for i686 (as usual).
My bad. Sorry, no working i686 with cryptsetup. For such cases a user signoff request on arch-general may be useful. Or just move it without signoff. -- Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич)
participants (3)
-
Arch Website Notification
-
Roman Kyrylych
-
Thomas Bächler