[arch-dev-public] Status of sigurd.archlinux.org/aur.archlinux.org

newer
[arch-dev-public] Signoff report...

older
[arch-dev-public] Signoff report...

Lukas Fleischer

27 Oct 2012 27 Oct '12

12:32 p.m.

Just a short note to everybody: sigurd is down due to maintenance works. We noticed several disk read failures lately and decided that one of disks needs to be replaced. The replacement was performed yesterday on ~20:00 CEST and finished on ~20:45 CEST. The support set up a live environment after the replacement was completed for some reason. Unfortunately, I wasn't online at that time, so I couldn't react immediately -- sorry for that. We are currently working on getting access to the rescue environment and trying to figure out what happened here. I will keep you updated. Thanks for your patience!

Show replies by date

Lukas Fleischer

27 Oct 27 Oct

5:08 p.m.

On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 02:32:03PM +0200, Lukas Fleischer wrote:

...

Just a short note to everybody: sigurd is down due to maintenance works. We noticed several disk read failures lately and decided that one of disks needs to be replaced. The replacement was performed yesterday on ~20:00 CEST and finished on ~20:45 CEST.

The support set up a live environment after the replacement was completed for some reason. Unfortunately, I wasn't online at that time, so I couldn't react immediately -- sorry for that.

We are currently working on getting access to the rescue environment and trying to figure out what happened here.

I will keep you updated. Thanks for your patience!

sigurd is up again. TUs should be able to use SVN and devtools as before. The AUR has been moved to alderaan -- if there's any issues with the new setup, please let us know. Thanks to Ionut and Pierre who helped me with migrating to the new server.

Pierre Schmitz

5:14 p.m.

Am 27.10.2012 19:08, schrieb Lukas Fleischer:

...

sigurd is up again. TUs should be able to use SVN and devtools as before.

Actually they should not. devtools still refers to aur.archlinux.org which we rerouted. The svn needs to be accessed via sigurd.archlinux.org now. Updated devtools will be released today. Existing checkouts need to be migrated. Greetings, Pierre -- Pierre Schmitz, https://pierre-schmitz.com

Florian Pritz

5:42 p.m.

New subject: [arch-dev-public] Check list for migration of existing community svn checkouts (was: Status of sigurd.archlinux.org/aur.archlinux.org)

On 27.10.2012 19:14, Pierre Schmitz wrote:

...

Actually they should not. devtools still refers to aur.archlinux.org which we rerouted. The svn needs to be accessed via sigurd.archlinux.org now. Updated devtools will be released today.

- update devtools to 20121027 or newer (not yet pushed to the repos, but should come soon) - fix your ~/.ssh/config so the username is correct for sigurd.al.org instead of aur.al.org - "svn relocate svn+ssh://aur.archlinux.org/ svn+ssh://sigurd.archlinux.org/" all checkouts - do the same on pkgbuild.com if you use svn there -- Florian Pritz

Thomas Bächler

7:50 p.m.

New subject: [arch-dev-public] Status of sigurd.archlinux.org/aur.archlinux.org

Am 27.10.2012 19:14, schrieb Pierre Schmitz:

...

Am 27.10.2012 19:08, schrieb Lukas Fleischer:

...
sigurd is up again. TUs should be able to use SVN and devtools as before.

Actually they should not. devtools still refers to aur.archlinux.org which we rerouted. The svn needs to be accessed via sigurd.archlinux.org now. Updated devtools will be released today.

Existing checkouts need to be migrated.

Greetings,

We should finally have proper aliases for these. Like packages-submit.archlinux.org and community-submit.archlinux.org.

Ionut Biru

11:42 p.m.

New subject: [arch-dev-public] Status of sigurd.archlinux.org/aur.archlinux.org

On 10/27/2012 10:50 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:

...

Am 27.10.2012 19:14, schrieb Pierre Schmitz:

...
Am 27.10.2012 19:08, schrieb Lukas Fleischer:

...
sigurd is up again. TUs should be able to use SVN and devtools as before.

Actually they should not. devtools still refers to aur.archlinux.org which we rerouted. The svn needs to be accessed via sigurd.archlinux.org now. Updated devtools will be released today.

Existing checkouts need to be migrated.

Greetings,

We should finally have proper aliases for these. Like packages-submit.archlinux.org and community-submit.archlinux.org.

what is the purpose of those? -- Ionuț

Thomas Bächler

28 Oct 28 Oct

12:02 a.m.

New subject: [arch-dev-public] Status of sigurd.archlinux.org/aur.archlinux.org

Am 28.10.2012 01:42, schrieb Ionut Biru:

...

...
We should finally have proper aliases for these. Like packages-submit.archlinux.org and community-submit.archlinux.org.

what is the purpose of those?

Hostnames for subversion and package upload that devtools can use. This is the umpteenth time that the host name changes - these aliases would solve this problem transparently.

Sébastien Luttringer

12:10 a.m.

New subject: [arch-dev-public] Status of sigurd.archlinux.org/aur.archlinux.org

On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 2:02 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote:

...

Am 28.10.2012 01:42, schrieb Ionut Biru:

...
...
We should finally have proper aliases for these. Like packages-submit.archlinux.org and community-submit.archlinux.org.

what is the purpose of those?

Hostnames for subversion and package upload that devtools can use. This is the umpteenth time that the host name changes - these aliases would solve this problem transparently.

We can also use a config file for devtools programs instead of have config vars harcoded in scripts. -- Sébastien "Seblu" Luttringer https://www.seblu.net GPG: 0x2072D77A

Thomas Bächler

12:22 a.m.

New subject: [arch-dev-public] Status of sigurd.archlinux.org/aur.archlinux.org

Am 28.10.2012 02:10, schrieb Sébastien Luttringer:

...

On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 2:02 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote:

...
Am 28.10.2012 01:42, schrieb Ionut Biru:

...
...
We should finally have proper aliases for these. Like packages-submit.archlinux.org and community-submit.archlinux.org.

what is the purpose of those?

Hostnames for subversion and package upload that devtools can use. This is the umpteenth time that the host name changes - these aliases would solve this problem transparently.

We can also use a config file for devtools programs instead of have config vars harcoded in scripts.

The hostnames are "hardcoded" in your subversion checkout - and migrating the checkout is annoying, because subversion sucks. Why are you guys arguing against having two extra DNS CNAMEs to make everyone's lives easier?

Sébastien Luttringer

12:33 a.m.

New subject: [arch-dev-public] Status of sigurd.archlinux.org/aur.archlinux.org

On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 2:22 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote:

...

Am 28.10.2012 02:10, schrieb Sébastien Luttringer:

...
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 2:02 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote:

...
Am 28.10.2012 01:42, schrieb Ionut Biru:

...
...
We should finally have proper aliases for these. Like packages-submit.archlinux.org and community-submit.archlinux.org.

what is the purpose of those?

Hostnames for subversion and package upload that devtools can use. This is the umpteenth time that the host name changes - these aliases would solve this problem transparently.

We can also use a config file for devtools programs instead of have config vars harcoded in scripts.

The hostnames are "hardcoded" in your subversion checkout - and migrating the checkout is annoying, because subversion sucks. So true.

...

Why are you guys arguing against having two extra DNS CNAMEs to make everyone's lives easier?

I'm not arguing against! This DNS trick is a good idea (so please do it), but I _also_ suggest to have config files in devtools. Cheers, -- Sébastien "Seblu" Luttringer https://www.seblu.net GPG: 0x2072D77A

Ionut Biru

5:35 a.m.

New subject: [arch-dev-public] Status of sigurd.archlinux.org/aur.archlinux.org

On 10/28/2012 03:22 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote:

...

Am 28.10.2012 02:10, schrieb Sébastien Luttringer:

...
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 2:02 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote:

...
Am 28.10.2012 01:42, schrieb Ionut Biru:

...
...
We should finally have proper aliases for these. Like packages-submit.archlinux.org and community-submit.archlinux.org.

what is the purpose of those?

Hostnames for subversion and package upload that devtools can use. This is the umpteenth time that the host name changes - these aliases would solve this problem transparently.

We can also use a config file for devtools programs instead of have config vars harcoded in scripts.

The hostnames are "hardcoded" in your subversion checkout - and migrating the checkout is annoying, because subversion sucks.

Why are you guys arguing against having two extra DNS CNAMEs to make everyone's lives easier?

nobody is arguing. just trying to understand their purpose. the following are in place: packages-submit CNAME gerolde community-submit CNAME sigurd -- Ionuț

Thomas Bächler

8:56 a.m.

New subject: [arch-dev-public] Status of sigurd.archlinux.org/aur.archlinux.org

Am 28.10.2012 06:35, schrieb Ionut Biru:

...

...
...
...
Hostnames for subversion and package upload that devtools can use. This is the umpteenth time that the host name changes - these aliases would solve this problem transparently.

We can also use a config file for devtools programs instead of have config vars harcoded in scripts.

The hostnames are "hardcoded" in your subversion checkout - and migrating the checkout is annoying, because subversion sucks.

Why are you guys arguing against having two extra DNS CNAMEs to make everyone's lives easier?

nobody is arguing. just trying to understand their purpose. the following are in place:

Okay.

...

packages-submit CNAME gerolde community-submit CNAME sigurd

Correct. We should now tell everyone to migrate their SVN checkouts to these hostnames. Devtools should use those as well. Starting now, when we change hosts, we just adjust these CNAMES.

Pierre Schmitz

7:21 a.m.

Am 27.10.2012 21:50, schrieb Thomas Bächler:

...

Am 27.10.2012 19:14, schrieb Pierre Schmitz:

...
Am 27.10.2012 19:08, schrieb Lukas Fleischer:

...
sigurd is up again. TUs should be able to use SVN and devtools as before.

Actually they should not. devtools still refers to aur.archlinux.org which we rerouted. The svn needs to be accessed via sigurd.archlinux.org now. Updated devtools will be released today.

Existing checkouts need to be migrated.

Greetings,

We should finally have proper aliases for these. Like packages-submit.archlinux.org and community-submit.archlinux.org.

This wont help much when we move both repos to the one new server as the paths will have to change. ATM we use the same path on two different hosts. -- Pierre Schmitz, https://pierre-schmitz.com

Thomas Bächler

8:57 a.m.

New subject: [arch-dev-public] Status of sigurd.archlinux.org/aur.archlinux.org

Am 28.10.2012 08:21, schrieb Pierre Schmitz:

...

Am 27.10.2012 21:50, schrieb Thomas Bächler:

...
Am 27.10.2012 19:14, schrieb Pierre Schmitz:

...
Am 27.10.2012 19:08, schrieb Lukas Fleischer:

...
sigurd is up again. TUs should be able to use SVN and devtools as before.

Actually they should not. devtools still refers to aur.archlinux.org which we rerouted. The svn needs to be accessed via sigurd.archlinux.org now. Updated devtools will be released today.

Existing checkouts need to be migrated.

Greetings,

We should finally have proper aliases for these. Like packages-submit.archlinux.org and community-submit.archlinux.org.

This wont help much when we move both repos to the one new server as the paths will have to change. ATM we use the same path on two different hosts.

Ah yes, you're right :(. It's still an improvement.

4201

Age (days ago)

4202

Last active (days ago)

List overview

Download

13 comments

6 participants

participants (6)

Florian Pritz
Ionut Biru
Lukas Fleischer
Pierre Schmitz
Sébastien Luttringer
Thomas Bächler

[arch-dev-public] Status of sigurd.archlinux.org/aur.archlinux.org

tags

participants (6)