The poppler/poppler-glib update to 0.14 includes a soname bump for poppler and poppler-glib. Packages depending on these libraries should be rebuilt. I already did all packages in extra, some packages in community still need an update. To track the rebuild, a todo list was created: http://www.archlinux.org/todo/38/
Please rebuild these packages in community-testing and flag them as complete after that.
On 06/22/2010 11:29 PM, Jan de Groot wrote:
The poppler/poppler-glib update to 0.14 includes a soname bump for poppler and poppler-glib. Packages depending on these libraries should be rebuilt. I already did all packages in extra, some packages in community still need an update. To track the rebuild, a todo list was created: http://www.archlinux.org/todo/38/
Please rebuild these packages in community-testing and flag them as complete after that.
poppler < 0.14.4 has a vulnerability[1] and it needs to be moved as soon as possible. The only package from todo is koffice-filters.
koffice-filters is a bit special. koffice is already rebuilt in testing against python2 2.7.
to move it fast, i propose to rebuild koffice-filter extra against staging bumping pkgrel to 1.1 (testing repo disable) and push it in staging.
after poppler is moved in extra, rebuild the testing against extra.
Ronald, what do you think?
[1] http://securitytracker.com/alerts/2010/Oct/1024520.html
On 13/10/10 05:54, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
On 06/22/2010 11:29 PM, Jan de Groot wrote:
The poppler/poppler-glib update to 0.14 includes a soname bump for poppler and poppler-glib. Packages depending on these libraries should be rebuilt. I already did all packages in extra, some packages in community still need an update. To track the rebuild, a todo list was created: http://www.archlinux.org/todo/38/
Please rebuild these packages in community-testing and flag them as complete after that.
poppler < 0.14.4 has a vulnerability[1] and it needs to be moved as soon as possible. The only package from todo is koffice-filters.
koffice-filters is a bit special. koffice is already rebuilt in testing against python2 2.7.
to move it fast, i propose to rebuild koffice-filter extra against staging bumping pkgrel to 1.1 (testing repo disable) and push it in staging.
after poppler is moved in extra, rebuild the testing against extra.
Ronald, what do you think?
The koffice-kword package has three files with /usr/bin/python -> python2 changes and that is the only reason it is in testing. Rebuild it against poppler in [staging] (making sure those files still point at python2...), move it to [extra] and remove the one in [testing].
Allan
On 10/13/2010 07:10 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
On 13/10/10 05:54, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
On 06/22/2010 11:29 PM, Jan de Groot wrote:
The poppler/poppler-glib update to 0.14 includes a soname bump for poppler and poppler-glib. Packages depending on these libraries should be rebuilt. I already did all packages in extra, some packages in community still need an update. To track the rebuild, a todo list was created: http://www.archlinux.org/todo/38/
Please rebuild these packages in community-testing and flag them as complete after that.
poppler < 0.14.4 has a vulnerability[1] and it needs to be moved as soon as possible. The only package from todo is koffice-filters.
koffice-filters is a bit special. koffice is already rebuilt in testing against python2 2.7.
to move it fast, i propose to rebuild koffice-filter extra against staging bumping pkgrel to 1.1 (testing repo disable) and push it in staging.
after poppler is moved in extra, rebuild the testing against extra.
Ronald, what do you think?
The koffice-kword package has three files with /usr/bin/python -> python2 changes and that is the only reason it is in testing. Rebuild it against poppler in [staging] (making sure those files still point at python2...), move it to [extra] and remove the one in [testing].
Allan
done
arch-dev-public@lists.archlinux.org