Hey guys, I'm bringing this up here: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/8780
There was an oops in our none-too-smart DB scripts. The scripts say firefox 2.0.0.10-2 but the FILENAME points to the 2.0.0.10-1 file. There actually WASN'T a -2 version but the PKGBUILD had -2
While this is actually NOT critical, and causes no real issues, it causes _apparent_ issues
Users actually notice, and think there is an error. Simply downgrading the DB to -1 doesn't work because pacman thinks everyone has -2 installed. I've closed like 5 bug reports about this and there are forum threads and ML threads about it.
Would someone mind simply rebuilding a -3 version to get rid of the belief that this is an error and make everything a bit more sane?
I'd do it but I won't have time to test for maybe 6 hours or so.
Thanks, Aaron
On Nov 30, 2007 11:35 PM, Aaron Griffin aaronmgriffin@gmail.com wrote:
Would someone mind simply rebuilding a -3 version to get rid of the belief that this is an error and make everything a bit more sane?
I'd do it but I won't have time to test for maybe 6 hours or so.
I'll rebuild for i686. From what I see, there doesn't seem to be a need to rebuild for x86_64, and I'll leave it as -1.
Varun
On Dec 1, 2007 1:09 AM, Varun Acharya ganja.guru.x64@gmail.com wrote:
On Nov 30, 2007 11:35 PM, Aaron Griffin aaronmgriffin@gmail.com wrote:
Would someone mind simply rebuilding a -3 version to get rid of the belief that this is an error and make everything a bit more sane?
I'd do it but I won't have time to test for maybe 6 hours or so.
I'll rebuild for i686. From what I see, there doesn't seem to be a need to rebuild for x86_64, and I'll leave it as -1.
Varun
Unfortunately, looks like I'll have it uploaded in about 4 hours, cause I need to sleep while this downloads source and compiles. If anyone can get to it faster, please do.
Thanks, Varun
arch-dev-public@lists.archlinux.org