On 27/05/2009, Thomas Bächler thomas@archlinux.org wrote:
How about adding this to extra? It seems NM is very popular, and until it is part of kdenetwork we should not force a high percentage of our users to build it from AUR.
we could, I was waiting a stable version. what others DEV think about this?
On Wednesday 27 May 2009 07:07:10 am Andrea Scarpino wrote:
On 27/05/2009, Thomas Bächler thomas@archlinux.org wrote:
How about adding this to extra? It seems NM is very popular, and until it is part of kdenetwork we should not force a high percentage of our users to build it from AUR.
we could, I was waiting a stable version. what others DEV think about this?
Well, if you are talking about networkmanager-plasmoid-svn which is a very useful and cool application, I say yes. But last time I used it from svn, which was like two weeks ago, still it had the flaw that it didn't remember wireless keys and is a lot of problem to get wireless working.
On 27/05/2009, Eduardo Romero k3nsai@gmail.com wrote:
Well, if you are talking about networkmanager-plasmoid-svn which is a very useful and cool application, I say yes.
Yes, I am talking about networkmanager-plasmoid-svn.
I do not more use it, I back to netcfg from 2 weeks, so feedback are appreciated.
Am Mittwoch, 27. Mai 2009 13:07:10 schrieb Andrea Scarpino:
we could, I was waiting a stable version. what others DEV think about this?
Its in a very early develepoment stage and its still in kde playground for a reason; imho its not ready for production.
On 27/05/2009, Pierre Schmitz pierre@archlinux.de wrote:
Its in a very early develepoment stage and its still in kde playground for a reason; imho its not ready for production.
After 5 months I think this plasmoid can be finally moved in [extra] o [community]. I am using it and it never crash, supports wireless with WEP/WPA/WAP2/LEAP and VPN connection.
What's your point here? Can I move it?
Note: there is not a tarball ATM, so I will move an svn snapshot.
Am Dienstag 20 Oktober 2009 18:36:11 schrieb Andrea Scarpino:
What's your point here? Can I move it?
I did not check it for some time. We are talking about http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/playground/base/plasma/applets/networkmanager/ right?
If you think it's worth it you can move it to extra.
But we should find a name which is more inline with upstream. What about kdeplasma-applets-networkmanager?
On 25/10/2009, Pierre Schmitz pierre@archlinux.de wrote:
I did not check it for some time. We are talking about http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/playground/base/plasma/applets/networkmanager/ right?
If you think it's worth it you can move it to extra.
But we should find a name which is more inline with upstream. What about kdeplasma-applets-networkmanager?
Yes, I think it can be moved in [extra] as kdeplasma-applets-networkmanager. Can I proceed?
Am Sonntag 25 Oktober 2009 11:59:57 schrieb Andrea Scarpino:
Yes, I think it can be moved in [extra] as kdeplasma-applets-networkmanager. Can I proceed?
Sure, go ahead.
arch-dev-public@lists.archlinux.org