Am 03.01.2012 13:27, schrieb Ionut Biru:

On 01/03/2012 02:25 PM, Allan McRae wrote:

...

Do we want to do a mass rebuild for the packages in [extra] that are not yet signed?

There are currently 800 packages remaining unsigned. In December, around 20 to 30 packages were newly signed, so if we stick at that rate we will have [extra] fully signed by mid 2014...

Allan

we could start libpng 1.5 rebuild :D

Sounds like a good idea. After that, we'll see how many packages are left unsigned.

On 01/03/2012 08:43 PM, Eric Bélanger wrote:

On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Allan McRae wrote:

...

Do we want to do a mass rebuild for the packages in [extra] that are not yet signed?

There are currently 800 packages remaining unsigned. In December, around 20 to 30 packages were newly signed, so if we stick at that rate we will have [extra] fully signed by mid 2014...

Allan

FYI, there is a major libtiff and a minor xine-lib rebuild in the pipeline. They'll happen when the current db and libarchive rebuild will be done or maybe earlier if they don't overlap with each other.

There is also an upcoming bash-completion rebuild (the completions will be moved from /etc to /usr/share) but I'm waiting for pacman 4 to leave testing for that. I'm not really sure why it's still in testing...

ok then, libpng rebuild can wait until those are done. I'm not very happy starting this since we almost for sure need to patch every package, unless they gained support in this time.

There's the possibility of several unsigned packages ending up on these todo list so it might be worth while to wait after these rebuilds before doing any package signing rebuild.

Eric

-- Ionuț

On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 8:17 PM, Allan McRae wrote:

On 04/01/12 05:02, Ionut Biru wrote:

...

On 01/03/2012 08:43 PM, Eric Bélanger wrote:

...

On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Allan McRae wrote:

...

Do we want to do a mass rebuild for the packages in [extra] that are not yet signed?

There are currently 800 packages remaining unsigned.  In December, around 20 to 30 packages were newly signed, so if we stick at that rate we will have [extra] fully signed by mid 2014...

Allan

FYI, there is a major libtiff and a minor xine-lib  rebuild in the pipeline.  They'll happen when the current db and libarchive rebuild will be done or maybe earlier if they don't overlap with each other.

There is also an upcoming bash-completion rebuild (the completions will be moved from /etc to /usr/share) but I'm waiting for pacman 4 to leave testing for that. I'm not really sure why it's still in testing...

ok then, libpng rebuild can wait until those are done.

I'm not very happy starting this since we almost for sure need to patch every package, unless they gained support in this time.

Wouldn't the libpng and libtiff rebuilds overlap substantially.  It might be worth doing both at the same time.

Allan

I just checked and, indeed, there's significant overlap between the libpng and libtiff rebuild so doing them together would definitely be worthwhile. We should wait for the current rebuilds to be completed then coordinate a png/tiff rebuild.