On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Andreas Radke wrote:

we have svn pkg 1.6.4-2 in testing and a later 1.6.5-2 in extra-x86_64 and an older one in extra-i686.

any reason? I assume we need to rebuild 1.6.5-2 for i686 and clean up the ones in testing?

-Andy

you might already know this, but just in case : http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/2009-August/007240.html

On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Andreas Radke wrote:

Am Wed, 2 Sep 2009 19:41:36 +0200 schrieb Xavier :

...

On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Andreas Radke wrote:

...

we have svn pkg 1.6.4-2 in testing and a later 1.6.5-2 in extra-x86_64 and an older one in extra-i686.

any reason? I assume we need to rebuild 1.6.5-2 for i686 and clean up the ones in testing?

-Andy

you might already know this, but just in case : http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/2009-August/007240.html

missed that. we can always help out. a simple "no time currently" would be enough from the maintainers.

Would someone be able to bump the package in testing to match extra for this case?

On 02/09/2009, Andrea Scarpino wrote:

On 02/09/2009, Aaron Griffin wrote:

...

Would someone be able to bump the package in testing to match extra for this case? I am building subversion 1.6.5-3 in [testing] but for i686 only. Ok, I putted subversion 1.6.5-2 built with ruby 1.8.7 in [extra] and 1.6.5-3 built with ruby 1.9.1 in [testing], please someone build the 1.6.5-3 for x86_64.

-- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer