Hey guys, If you all remember, after the last archweb release, we had to offload the todolists (package IDs no longer matched, and it was all complex to convert, so we deferred it).
Well, I'm going to re-add the ones that we still need (i.e. DB rebuilds)
I dumped all the old lists here: http://dev.archlinux.org/~aaron/todolists.txt Please take a look at the top section, and let me know which lists can be deleted and which are still useful if you can.
Cheers, Aaron
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 2:43 PM, Aaron Griffin aaronmgriffin@gmail.com wrote:
Hey guys, If you all remember, after the last archweb release, we had to offload the todolists (package IDs no longer matched, and it was all complex to convert, so we deferred it).
Well, I'm going to re-add the ones that we still need (i.e. DB rebuilds)
I dumped all the old lists here: http://dev.archlinux.org/~aaron/todolists.txt Please take a look at the top section, and let me know which lists can be deleted and which are still useful if you can.
Cheers, Aaron
The Broken Licenses TODO should probably be regenerated if we're going to re-add it - in fact, since it was generated by a script anyways, we could probably incorporate it into the weekly sanity-check that goes out. I'll have a look at the script I wrote and adapt it to the new directory structure.
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 1:49 PM, Travis Willard travis@archlinux.org wrote:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 2:43 PM, Aaron Griffin aaronmgriffin@gmail.com wrote:
Hey guys, If you all remember, after the last archweb release, we had to offload the todolists (package IDs no longer matched, and it was all complex to convert, so we deferred it).
Well, I'm going to re-add the ones that we still need (i.e. DB rebuilds)
I dumped all the old lists here: http://dev.archlinux.org/~aaron/todolists.txt Please take a look at the top section, and let me know which lists can be deleted and which are still useful if you can.
Cheers, Aaron
The Broken Licenses TODO should probably be regenerated if we're going to re-add it - in fact, since it was generated by a script anyways, we could probably incorporate it into the weekly sanity-check that goes out. I'll have a look at the script I wrote and adapt it to the new directory structure.
The reporead.py script that dumps the pacman DBs to the web interface sends me emails every night that contain this info. Let me forward one to the list. I could probably set it up to email once a week too.
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Aaron Griffin aaronmgriffin@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 1:49 PM, Travis Willard travis@archlinux.org wrote:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 2:43 PM, Aaron Griffin aaronmgriffin@gmail.com wrote:
Hey guys, If you all remember, after the last archweb release, we had to offload the todolists (package IDs no longer matched, and it was all complex to convert, so we deferred it).
Well, I'm going to re-add the ones that we still need (i.e. DB rebuilds)
I dumped all the old lists here: http://dev.archlinux.org/~aaron/todolists.txt Please take a look at the top section, and let me know which lists can be deleted and which are still useful if you can.
Cheers, Aaron
The Broken Licenses TODO should probably be regenerated if we're going to re-add it - in fact, since it was generated by a script anyways, we could probably incorporate it into the weekly sanity-check that goes out. I'll have a look at the script I wrote and adapt it to the new directory structure.
The reporead.py script that dumps the pacman DBs to the web interface sends me emails every night that contain this info. Let me forward one to the list. I could probably set it up to email once a week too.
Took a look at the output - it looks good, but I only see "No license" messages - nothing that checks for the validity of entries within the licenses array, which was what my script checked. For example, it ensured that the items in the array were either licenses contained in /usr/share/licenses/common or "custom" - and that the ones using a "custom" license referenced /usr/share/licenses somewhere in their build() function.
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 2:13 PM, Travis Willard travis@archlinux.org wrote:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Aaron Griffin aaronmgriffin@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 1:49 PM, Travis Willard travis@archlinux.org wrote:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 2:43 PM, Aaron Griffin aaronmgriffin@gmail.com wrote:
Hey guys, If you all remember, after the last archweb release, we had to offload the todolists (package IDs no longer matched, and it was all complex to convert, so we deferred it).
Well, I'm going to re-add the ones that we still need (i.e. DB rebuilds)
I dumped all the old lists here: http://dev.archlinux.org/~aaron/todolists.txt Please take a look at the top section, and let me know which lists can be deleted and which are still useful if you can.
Cheers, Aaron
The Broken Licenses TODO should probably be regenerated if we're going to re-add it - in fact, since it was generated by a script anyways, we could probably incorporate it into the weekly sanity-check that goes out. I'll have a look at the script I wrote and adapt it to the new directory structure.
The reporead.py script that dumps the pacman DBs to the web interface sends me emails every night that contain this info. Let me forward one to the list. I could probably set it up to email once a week too.
Took a look at the output - it looks good, but I only see "No license" messages - nothing that checks for the validity of entries within the licenses array, which was what my script checked. For example, it ensured that the items in the array were either licenses contained in /usr/share/licenses/common or "custom" - and that the ones using a "custom" license referenced /usr/share/licenses somewhere in their build() function.
Ah nice, then that would be useful
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 3:16 PM, Aaron Griffin aaronmgriffin@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 2:13 PM, Travis Willard travis@archlinux.org wrote:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Aaron Griffin aaronmgriffin@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 1:49 PM, Travis Willard travis@archlinux.org wrote:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 2:43 PM, Aaron Griffin aaronmgriffin@gmail.com wrote:
Hey guys, If you all remember, after the last archweb release, we had to offload the todolists (package IDs no longer matched, and it was all complex to convert, so we deferred it).
Well, I'm going to re-add the ones that we still need (i.e. DB rebuilds)
I dumped all the old lists here: http://dev.archlinux.org/~aaron/todolists.txt Please take a look at the top section, and let me know which lists can be deleted and which are still useful if you can.
Cheers, Aaron
The Broken Licenses TODO should probably be regenerated if we're going to re-add it - in fact, since it was generated by a script anyways, we could probably incorporate it into the weekly sanity-check that goes out. I'll have a look at the script I wrote and adapt it to the new directory structure.
The reporead.py script that dumps the pacman DBs to the web interface sends me emails every night that contain this info. Let me forward one to the list. I could probably set it up to email once a week too.
Took a look at the output - it looks good, but I only see "No license" messages - nothing that checks for the validity of entries within the licenses array, which was what my script checked. For example, it ensured that the items in the array were either licenses contained in /usr/share/licenses/common or "custom" - and that the ones using a "custom" license referenced /usr/share/licenses somewhere in their build() function.
Ah nice, then that would be useful
I've attached output from the script run over an SVN checkout. I like the svn repo structure - as you can see in the output, we can tell which trunk PKGBUILDs are screwy, but also which ones in the repos are screwy too (ie. if someone updated the trunk PKGBUILD, but hasn't pushed the license out to the repos, we can easily see that.)
It's a bit verbose, but only because SO many packages are missing licenses or have improper entries.
The script that generated this list is /home/travis/find-bad-licenses run from /home/abs/checkout
Travis Willard wrote:
I've attached output from the script run over an SVN checkout. I like the svn repo structure - as you can see in the output, we can tell which trunk PKGBUILDs are screwy, but also which ones in the repos are screwy too (ie. if someone updated the trunk PKGBUILD, but hasn't pushed the license out to the repos, we can easily see that.)
It's a bit verbose, but only because SO many packages are missing licenses or have improper entries.
The script that generated this list is /home/travis/find-bad-licenses run from /home/abs/checkout
And because I was bored, here is a summary of the [core] packages from that list:
bridge-utils (in trunk) corewars (missing in i686) dhcpcd (custom [BSD] not in /usr/share/licenses) dosfstools (in trunk) e2fsprogs (custom [MIT] not in /usr/share/licenses) gen-init-cpio (custom [custom:none] not in /usr/share/licenses) hdparm (custom [BSD] not in /usr/share/licenses) heimdal (in trunk) hwdetect (custom [custom:none] not in /usr/share/licenses) ipw2100-fw (in trunk) ipw2200-fw (in trunk) ipw3945-ucode (missing) ipw3945d (missing) isdn4k-utils (in trunk) klibc (custom [BSD] not in /usr/share/licenses) libdownload (custom [BSD] not in /usr/share/licenses) libsasl (in trunk) mailx (custom [BSD] not in /usr/share/licenses) nessus-core (in trunk) netkit-telnet (in trunk) popt (custom [MIT] not in /usr/share/licenses) ppp (custom [custom:GPL/BSD] not in /usr/share/licenses) rt2500 (in trunk) xinetd (in trunk)
2008/7/1 Allan McRae allan@archlinux.org:
Travis Willard wrote:
I've attached output from the script run over an SVN checkout. I like the svn repo structure - as you can see in the output, we can tell which trunk PKGBUILDs are screwy, but also which ones in the repos are screwy too (ie. if someone updated the trunk PKGBUILD, but hasn't pushed the license out to the repos, we can easily see that.)
It's a bit verbose, but only because SO many packages are missing licenses or have improper entries.
The script that generated this list is /home/travis/find-bad-licenses run from /home/abs/checkout
And because I was bored, here is a summary of the [core] packages from that list:
bridge-utils (in trunk) corewars (missing in i686) dhcpcd (custom [BSD] not in /usr/share/licenses) dosfstools (in trunk) e2fsprogs (custom [MIT] not in /usr/share/licenses) gen-init-cpio (custom [custom:none] not in /usr/share/licenses) hdparm (custom [BSD] not in /usr/share/licenses) heimdal (in trunk) hwdetect (custom [custom:none] not in /usr/share/licenses) ipw2100-fw (in trunk) ipw2200-fw (in trunk) ipw3945-ucode (missing) ipw3945d (missing) isdn4k-utils (in trunk) klibc (custom [BSD] not in /usr/share/licenses) libdownload (custom [BSD] not in /usr/share/licenses) libsasl (in trunk) mailx (custom [BSD] not in /usr/share/licenses) nessus-core (in trunk) netkit-telnet (in trunk) popt (custom [MIT] not in /usr/share/licenses) ppp (custom [custom:GPL/BSD] not in /usr/share/licenses) rt2500 (in trunk) xinetd (in trunk)
not all of them are from [core], e.g. corewars ;-)
Roman Kyrylych wrote:
2008/7/1 Allan McRae allan@archlinux.org:
Travis Willard wrote:
I've attached output from the script run over an SVN checkout. I like the svn repo structure - as you can see in the output, we can tell which trunk PKGBUILDs are screwy, but also which ones in the repos are screwy too (ie. if someone updated the trunk PKGBUILD, but hasn't pushed the license out to the repos, we can easily see that.)
It's a bit verbose, but only because SO many packages are missing licenses or have improper entries.
The script that generated this list is /home/travis/find-bad-licenses run from /home/abs/checkout
And because I was bored, here is a summary of the [core] packages from that list:
bridge-utils (in trunk) corewars (missing in i686) dhcpcd (custom [BSD] not in /usr/share/licenses) dosfstools (in trunk) e2fsprogs (custom [MIT] not in /usr/share/licenses) gen-init-cpio (custom [custom:none] not in /usr/share/licenses) hdparm (custom [BSD] not in /usr/share/licenses) heimdal (in trunk) hwdetect (custom [custom:none] not in /usr/share/licenses) ipw2100-fw (in trunk) ipw2200-fw (in trunk) ipw3945-ucode (missing) ipw3945d (missing) isdn4k-utils (in trunk) klibc (custom [BSD] not in /usr/share/licenses) libdownload (custom [BSD] not in /usr/share/licenses) libsasl (in trunk) mailx (custom [BSD] not in /usr/share/licenses) nessus-core (in trunk) netkit-telnet (in trunk) popt (custom [MIT] not in /usr/share/licenses) ppp (custom [custom:GPL/BSD] not in /usr/share/licenses) rt2500 (in trunk) xinetd (in trunk)
not all of them are from [core], e.g. corewars ;-)
My awk-fu has been put to shame! :(
arch-dev-public@lists.archlinux.org