[arch-dev-public] [signoff] rp-pppoe-3.8-3
Hi,
the above package fixed "FS#8498 - Enable kernel-mode for rp-pppoe." Please signoff for both architectures.
Daniel
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 22:11:28 +0100 Daniel Isenmann daniel.isenmann@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
the above package fixed "FS#8498 - Enable kernel-mode for rp-pppoe." Please signoff for both architectures.
Daniel
No signoffs?
On Thu, 2008-02-21 at 21:54 +0100, Daniel Isenmann wrote:
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 22:11:28 +0100 Daniel Isenmann daniel.isenmann@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
the above package fixed "FS#8498 - Enable kernel-mode for rp-pppoe." Please signoff for both architectures.
Daniel
No signoffs?
I seem to remember we had a lack of devs actually using PPPoE last time something needed tested.
Dale
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 3:24 PM, Dale Blount dale@archlinux.org wrote:
On Thu, 2008-02-21 at 21:54 +0100, Daniel Isenmann wrote:
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 22:11:28 +0100 Daniel Isenmann daniel.isenmann@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
the above package fixed "FS#8498 - Enable kernel-mode for rp-pppoe." Please signoff for both architectures.
Daniel
No signoffs?
I seem to remember we had a lack of devs actually using PPPoE last time something needed tested.
Agreed. Consider me signed off, I'll take the blame if there is broken-ness. 9 days is enough time in testing.
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 3:24 PM, Dale Blount dale@archlinux.org wrote:
On Thu, 2008-02-21 at 21:54 +0100, Daniel Isenmann wrote:
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 22:11:28 +0100 Daniel Isenmann daniel.isenmann@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
the above package fixed "FS#8498 - Enable kernel-mode for rp-pppoe." Please signoff for both architectures.
Daniel
No signoffs?
I seem to remember we had a lack of devs actually using PPPoE last time something needed tested.
I do this on my router and not my computer, so I can't help a whole lot here, sorry.
For something like this, you may be able to recruit a few community volunteer testers- I think that would be an acceptable way to get signoffs for things that the devs cannot test.
-Dan
Am Donnerstag, 21. Februar 2008 schrieb Dan McGee:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 3:24 PM, Dale Blount dale@archlinux.org wrote:
On Thu, 2008-02-21 at 21:54 +0100, Daniel Isenmann wrote:
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 22:11:28 +0100
Daniel Isenmann daniel.isenmann@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
the above package fixed "FS#8498 - Enable kernel-mode for rp-pppoe." Please signoff for both architectures.
Daniel
No signoffs?
I seem to remember we had a lack of devs actually using PPPoE last time something needed tested.
I do this on my router and not my computer, so I can't help a whole lot here, sorry.
For something like this, you may be able to recruit a few community volunteer testers- I think that would be an acceptable way to get signoffs for things that the devs cannot test.
-Dan
bump anyone? is this movable or not? thanks greetings tpowa
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 1:56 PM, Tobias Powalowski t.powa@gmx.de wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 21. Februar 2008 schrieb Dan McGee:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 3:24 PM, Dale Blount dale@archlinux.org wrote:
On Thu, 2008-02-21 at 21:54 +0100, Daniel Isenmann wrote:
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 22:11:28 +0100
Daniel Isenmann daniel.isenmann@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
the above package fixed "FS#8498 - Enable kernel-mode for rp-pppoe." Please signoff for both architectures.
Daniel
No signoffs?
I seem to remember we had a lack of devs actually using PPPoE last time something needed tested.
I do this on my router and not my computer, so I can't help a whole lot here, sorry.
For something like this, you may be able to recruit a few community volunteer testers- I think that would be an acceptable way to get signoffs for things that the devs cannot test.
-Dan
bump anyone? is this movable or not?
Move it: On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 5:05 PM, Aaron Griffin aaronmgriffin@gmail.com wrote:
Agreed. Consider me signed off, I'll take the blame if there is broken-ness. 9 days is enough time in testing.
participants (5)
-
Aaron Griffin
-
Dale Blount
-
Dan McGee
-
Daniel Isenmann
-
Tobias Powalowski