On Sun, 29 Jun 2008, Allan McRae wrote:

Eric Belanger wrote:

...

gpm 1.20.5-1 : Upstream update with soname bump (ChangeLog below)

There is a report on the forums that gphoto2 also needs rebuilt against the new gpm.

Allan

A rebuilt gphoto2 is now in testing. I noticed that xawtv also needed a rebuild; it's in testing now. Please test and signoff ASAP. Ideally, I would like to get this moved to core/extra before the db soname bump because we don't want these two rebuilds to overlap (xemacs depends on both gpm and db). Thanks, Eric -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.

On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Aaron Griffin wrote:

On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 10:09 PM, Eric Belanger wrote:

...

On Sun, 29 Jun 2008, Allan McRae wrote:

...

Eric Belanger wrote:

...

gpm 1.20.5-1 : Upstream update with soname bump (ChangeLog below)

There is a report on the forums that gphoto2 also needs rebuilt against the new gpm.

Allan

A rebuilt gphoto2 is now in testing. I noticed that xawtv also needed a rebuild; it's in testing now.

Please test and signoff ASAP. Ideally, I would like to get this moved to core/extra before the db soname bump because we don't want these two rebuilds to overlap (xemacs depends on both gpm and db).

Ping guys, I'd gladly test, but my arch laptop is in the shop right now 8( Any takers from the community members watching this list?

I'll signoff on all of the original packages (vi, gpm, and links) for i686. -Dan

On Tue, 1 Jul 2008, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:

On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 10:31:35AM -0500, Aaron Griffin wrote:

...

On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 10:09 PM, Eric Belanger wrote:

...

On Sun, 29 Jun 2008, Allan McRae wrote:

...

Eric Belanger wrote:

...

gpm 1.20.5-1 : Upstream update with soname bump (ChangeLog below)

There is a report on the forums that gphoto2 also needs rebuilt against the new gpm.

Allan

A rebuilt gphoto2 is now in testing. I noticed that xawtv also needed a rebuild; it's in testing now.

Please test and signoff ASAP. Ideally, I would like to get this moved to core/extra before the db soname bump because we don't want these two rebuilds to overlap (xemacs depends on both gpm and db).

Ping guys, I'd gladly test, but my arch laptop is in the shop right now 8( Any takers from the community members watching this list?

I use gpm and vi daily so i guess i can signoff those for x86_64

Greg

Any signoff for links on x86_64? -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.

On Wed, 2 Jul 2008, Andreas Radke wrote:

Am Tue, 1 Jul 2008 18:24:27 -0400 (EDT) schrieb Eric Belanger :

...

Any signoff for links on x86_64?

seems to work well here. so i give you a 64bit signoff.

-Andy

Thanks. FTR, gpm and the rebuilt packages have been moved to core/extra. Eric -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.