Hi guys,
a user(Sven-Hendrik Haase) brought to my attention that firestarter has issues (memleaks). Well there are apparently some patches available somewhere .... but
- last release was Jan 29th, 2005 (yes that means 4 years) - there seems no activity in the project - it deals with iptables and the kernel (which has changed quite a bit over the last 4 years :P ) and is somewhat crucial to system security - in this state, I don't feel like fixing it(I don't maintain it anymore anyway) but I do consider it a security issue
Proposal to fix: Let's get riddence of it.
Opinions?
-T
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 4:25 PM, tobias@justdreams.de wrote:
Hi guys,
a user(Sven-Hendrik Haase) brought to my attention that firestarter has issues (memleaks). Well there are apparently some patches available somewhere .... but
- last release was Jan 29th, 2005 (yes that means 4 years)
- there seems no activity in the project
- it deals with iptables and the kernel (which has changed quite a bit over
the last 4 years :P ) and is somewhat crucial to system security
- in this state, I don't feel like fixing it(I don't maintain it anymore
anyway) but I do consider it a security issue
Proposal to fix: Let's get riddence of it.
Opinions?
-T
It has low usage (4%) anyway. No objections in removing it or moving it to unsupported.
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 3:44 PM, Eric Bélanger snowmaniscool@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 4:25 PM, tobias@justdreams.de wrote:
Hi guys,
a user(Sven-Hendrik Haase) brought to my attention that firestarter has issues (memleaks). Well there are apparently some patches available somewhere .... but
- last release was Jan 29th, 2005 (yes that means 4 years)
- there seems no activity in the project
- it deals with iptables and the kernel (which has changed quite a bit over
the last 4 years :P ) and is somewhat crucial to system security
- in this state, I don't feel like fixing it(I don't maintain it anymore
anyway) but I do consider it a security issue
Proposal to fix: Let's get riddence of it.
Opinions?
-T
It has low usage (4%) anyway. No objections in removing it or moving it to unsupported.
+1 from me. Never used it myself.
arch-dev-public@lists.archlinux.org