[arch-dev-public] [core] repo FTBFS
Here is a list of the current packages in the [core] repo that fail to build from source. I am not opening bug reports for these, but see if you can fix issues in your packages. Source failures: FAIL: libpcap libpcap-1.3.0.tar.gz.sig ... FAILED FAIL: licenses ruby-license.txt ... FAILED w3c.html ... FAILED FAIL: b43-fwcutter The requested URL returned error: 404 Not Found Build failures: FAIL: diffutils FAIL: gettext FAIL: grub-efi-x86_64 FAIL: libpipeline FAIL: m4 FAIL: man-db FAIL: tar glibc-2.16: error: 'gets' undeclared here (not in a function) FAIL: iptables fatal error: linux/netfilter_ipv4/ip_queue.h: No such file or directory FAIL: mkinitcpio-busybox shell/shell_common.c:375:2: error: unknown type name 'rlim_t' shell/shell_common.c:377:13: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type shell/shell_common.c:379:14: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type shell/shell_common.c:381:13: error: 'RLIM_INFINITY' undeclared (first use in this function) FAIL: net-tools fatal error: linux/if_tr.h: No such file or directory FAIL: pam pam_unix_acct.c:97:19: error: storage size of 'rlim' isn't known pam_unix_acct.c:106:19: error: 'RLIMIT_NOFILE' undeclared (first use in this function) Testsuite failures: FAIL: automake testsuite failure die to race condition: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-automake/2012-08/msg00052.html FAIL: libarchive 107: test_read_format_mtree FAIL FAIL: openldap testsuite failure... - dod not investigate... Packaging failures: FAIL: rp-pppoe mv: cannot stat '/build/pkg/etc/ppp/plugins/rp-pppoe.so': No such file or directory
Am 17.09.2012 12:47, schrieb Allan McRae:
Here is a list of the current packages in the [core] repo that fail to build from source. I am not opening bug reports for these, but see if you can fix issues in your packages.
Source failures:
FAIL: libpcap libpcap-1.3.0.tar.gz.sig ... FAILED
I'm confused. The .sig file has been replaced with a different one, but the source archive is the same. The signature is also still valid.
On 17/09/12 21:11, Thomas Bächler wrote:
Am 17.09.2012 12:47, schrieb Allan McRae:
Here is a list of the current packages in the [core] repo that fail to build from source. I am not opening bug reports for these, but see if you can fix issues in your packages.
Source failures:
FAIL: libpcap libpcap-1.3.0.tar.gz.sig ... FAILED
I'm confused. The .sig file has been replaced with a different one, but the source archive is the same.
The signature is also still valid.
Yeah... Perhaps the signature expired, or the signing key? I am thinking it is stupid to checksum these and I should make "makepkg -g" automatically give them the "SKIP" value in pacman-4.1. Allan
Am 17.09.2012 13:21, schrieb Allan McRae:
On 17/09/12 21:11, Thomas Bächler wrote:
Am 17.09.2012 12:47, schrieb Allan McRae:
Here is a list of the current packages in the [core] repo that fail to build from source. I am not opening bug reports for these, but see if you can fix issues in your packages.
Source failures:
FAIL: libpcap libpcap-1.3.0.tar.gz.sig ... FAILED
I'm confused. The .sig file has been replaced with a different one, but the source archive is the same.
The signature is also still valid.
Yeah... Perhaps the signature expired, or the signing key?
I am thinking it is stupid to checksum these and I should make "makepkg -g" automatically give them the "SKIP" value in pacman-4.1.
When 4.1 is out, I'll definitely add 'SKIP' in the checksums here.
Am Mon, 17 Sep 2012 20:47:28 +1000 schrieb Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>:
FAIL: man-db
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 6:47 AM, Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org> wrote:
Here is a list of the current packages in the [core] repo that fail to build from source. I am not opening bug reports for these, but see if you can fix issues in your packages.
Testsuite failures:
FAIL: openldap testsuite failure... - dod not investigate...
I can't reproduce it here. A few test are skipped because of a problem with the default configuration file (I suppose most users need to modify it) but the packages are still being built.
Packaging failures:
FAIL: rp-pppoe mv: cannot stat '/build/pkg/etc/ppp/plugins/rp-pppoe.so': No such file or directory
Does anyone uses rp-pppoe? It's orphan and also needs to be updated and and needs a systemd unit file (FS#31308). I could do these changes but I can't test anything.
Am 17.09.2012 22:10, schrieb Eric Bélanger:
Packaging failures:
FAIL: rp-pppoe mv: cannot stat '/build/pkg/etc/ppp/plugins/rp-pppoe.so': No such file or directory
Does anyone uses rp-pppoe? It's orphan and also needs to be updated and and needs a systemd unit file (FS#31308). I could do these changes but I can't test anything.
I wonder why it's still in core. Unless you want to run a PPPoE server, you can do everything with ppp - and netcfg provides easy pppoe configuration now.
On 18/09/12 06:20, Thomas Bächler wrote:
Am 17.09.2012 22:10, schrieb Eric Bélanger:
Packaging failures:
FAIL: rp-pppoe mv: cannot stat '/build/pkg/etc/ppp/plugins/rp-pppoe.so': No such file or directory
Does anyone uses rp-pppoe? It's orphan and also needs to be updated and and needs a systemd unit file (FS#31308). I could do these changes but I can't test anything.
I wonder why it's still in core. Unless you want to run a PPPoE server, you can do everything with ppp - and netcfg provides easy pppoe configuration now.
I am fine with dumping this to [extra] / [community] / ... Eric: go ahead and do the changes untested. Just put it in [testing] for a few days first. Allan
On 18/09/12 06:10, Eric Bélanger wrote:
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 6:47 AM, Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org> wrote:
Here is a list of the current packages in the [core] repo that fail to build from source. I am not opening bug reports for these, but see if you can fix issues in your packages.
Testsuite failures:
FAIL: openldap testsuite failure... - dod not investigate...
I can't reproduce it here. A few test are skipped because of a problem with the default configuration file (I suppose most users need to modify it) but the packages are still being built.
I can consistently get the test-suite failure on the build server. But I looked at the test suite output and it seems it could be quite fragile - lots of waiting x amount of seconds for a service to reset etc. So I am not concerned about that one. Allan
On 17/09/12 20:47, Allan McRae wrote:
Here is a list of the current packages in the [core] repo that fail to build from source. I am not opening bug reports for these, but see if you can fix issues in your packages.
The majority of these are now fixed - at least on truck. Remaining issues are:
FAIL: licenses ruby-license.txt ... FAILED w3c.html ... FAILED
The ruby has been updated - I assume we would want to just pull the new one? The w3c license does not look like it has changed, but the source now pull an html version.
FAIL: b43-fwcutter The requested URL returned error: 404 Not Found
The website for this is gone completely...
FAIL: mkinitcpio-busybox shell/shell_common.c:375:2: error: unknown type name 'rlim_t' shell/shell_common.c:377:13: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type shell/shell_common.c:379:14: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type shell/shell_common.c:381:13: error: 'RLIM_INFINITY' undeclared (first use in this function)
FAIL: pam pam_unix_acct.c:97:19: error: storage size of 'rlim' isn't known pam_unix_acct.c:106:19: error: 'RLIMIT_NOFILE' undeclared (first use in this function)
There is an update available for pam. I guess this will be fixed with that. Allan
participants (4)
-
Allan McRae
-
Andreas Radke
-
Eric Bélanger
-
Thomas Bächler