[arch-dev-public] [signoff] rp-pppoe 3.10-1
Hi, above package is in testing for both archs. Please signoff. I can't test the package because I don't use it, I have a router and not connected directly on the line. Daniel
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 12:34 PM, Daniel Isenmann <daniel.isenmann@gmx.de> wrote:
Hi,
above package is in testing for both archs. Please signoff. I can't test the package because I don't use it, I have a router and not connected directly on the line.
If no one uses this, you can take my awesome "blame me if crap be broken" signoff
Aaron Griffin schrieb:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 12:34 PM, Daniel Isenmann <daniel.isenmann@gmx.de> wrote:
Hi,
above package is in testing for both archs. Please signoff. I can't test the package because I don't use it, I have a router and not connected directly on the line.
If no one uses this, you can take my awesome "blame me if crap be broken" signoff
I wonder why this is in core anyway. PPPoE connections can be established with the pppd package alone. The only advantages this package has are: 1) A fancy configuration script. With pppd only, you'd have to read http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/PPPoE_Setup_with_pppd and set it up. We could include some example configuration like this in the pppd package though. 2) A PPPoE server. We don't need that in core. With pppd, the PPPoE protocol is handled in the kernel (while rp-pppoe does it in userspace), so pppd probably has less overhead anyway. I vote for db-move rp-pppoe core extra.
On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 14:27:51 +0200 Thomas Bächler <thomas@archlinux.org> wrote:
Aaron Griffin schrieb:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 12:34 PM, Daniel Isenmann <daniel.isenmann@gmx.de> wrote:
Hi,
above package is in testing for both archs. Please signoff. I can't test the package because I don't use it, I have a router and not connected directly on the line.
If no one uses this, you can take my awesome "blame me if crap be broken" signoff
I wonder why this is in core anyway. PPPoE connections can be established with the pppd package alone. The only advantages this package has are:
1) A fancy configuration script. With pppd only, you'd have to read http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/PPPoE_Setup_with_pppd and set it up. We could include some example configuration like this in the pppd package though.
2) A PPPoE server. We don't need that in core.
With pppd, the PPPoE protocol is handled in the kernel (while rp-pppoe does it in userspace), so pppd probably has less overhead anyway.
I vote for db-move rp-pppoe core extra.
I can't give any comments on that. I really don't use it and have never used it. I trust your statement. Any complains about moving to extra? If no, you can move it. Daniel
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 8:50 AM, Daniel Isenmann <daniel.isenmann@gmx.de> wrote:
On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 14:27:51 +0200 Thomas Bächler <thomas@archlinux.org> wrote:
Aaron Griffin schrieb:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 12:34 PM, Daniel Isenmann <daniel.isenmann@gmx.de> wrote:
Hi,
above package is in testing for both archs. Please signoff. I can't test the package because I don't use it, I have a router and not connected directly on the line.
If no one uses this, you can take my awesome "blame me if crap be broken" signoff
I wonder why this is in core anyway. PPPoE connections can be established with the pppd package alone. The only advantages this package has are:
1) A fancy configuration script. With pppd only, you'd have to read http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/PPPoE_Setup_with_pppd and set it up. We could include some example configuration like this in the pppd package though.
2) A PPPoE server. We don't need that in core.
With pppd, the PPPoE protocol is handled in the kernel (while rp-pppoe does it in userspace), so pppd probably has less overhead anyway.
I vote for db-move rp-pppoe core extra.
I can't give any comments on that. I really don't use it and have never used it.
I trust your statement. Any complains about moving to extra? If no, you can move it.
Maybe we should ask the users who actually use it - see if there is any rational reason they *depend* on it as opposed to pppd
Signoff (i686) -- Hugo
participants (4)
-
Aaron Griffin
-
Daniel Isenmann
-
Hugo Doria
-
Thomas Bächler