[arch-dev-public] procps and procps-ng compatibility
5 May
2012
5 May
'12
3:04 p.m.
Hi guys, We (Arch Linux) recently moved from procps to procps-ng[0], and we ran into a small incompatibility (with "sysctl -p" now taking an optional argument) [1]. It was easy enough to work around, but we wondered if these sorts of incompatibilities are documented anywhere (I could not find it in the manpage) and if there are others like it that we should know of? Cheers, Tom [0]: <http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2012-April/022845.html> [1]: <https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/29760>
4654
Age (days ago)
4654
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Tom Gundersen