[arch-dev-public] Resigning from package maintenance
Dealing with packaging has become a chore, so I will not be doing that for Arch anymore. I will continue maintaining the pacman codebase. Here is a list of packages up for adoption: Core [15]: autoconf automake binutils bison flex gcc (gcc-ada, gcc-fortran, gcc-go, gcc-libs, gcc-objc) glibc gmp libmpc libtool linux-api-headers m4 make mpfr pkg-config Extra [3]: dejagnu expect fakechroot Allan
On 2017-04-12 03:07, Allan McRae wrote:
Dealing with packaging has become a chore, so I will not be doing that for Arch anymore. I will continue maintaining the pacman codebase.
Here is a list of packages up for adoption:
Core [15]: autoconf automake binutils bison flex gcc (gcc-ada, gcc-fortran, gcc-go, gcc-libs, gcc-objc) glibc gmp libmpc libtool linux-api-headers m4 make mpfr pkg-config
Extra [3]: dejagnu expect fakechroot
Allan
Adopted gcc, glibc, gmp, pkg-config and packages from extra. I'm happy to see someone co-maintain these with me. Bartłomiej
On 12/04/17 17:28, Bartłomiej Piotrowski wrote:
On 2017-04-12 03:07, Allan McRae wrote:
Dealing with packaging has become a chore, so I will not be doing that for Arch anymore. I will continue maintaining the pacman codebase.
Here is a list of packages up for adoption:
Core [15]: autoconf automake binutils bison flex gcc (gcc-ada, gcc-fortran, gcc-go, gcc-libs, gcc-objc) glibc gmp libmpc libtool linux-api-headers m4 make mpfr pkg-config
Extra [3]: dejagnu expect fakechroot
Allan
Adopted gcc, glibc, gmp, pkg-config and packages from extra. I'm happy to see someone co-maintain these with me.
If you have gcc and glibc, you need to take linux-api-headers and binutils. They are a set. A
On 2017-04-12 09:38, Allan McRae wrote:
If you have gcc and glibc, you need to take linux-api-headers and binutils. They are a set.
A
Done.
participants (2)
-
Allan McRae
-
Bartłomiej Piotrowski