[arch-dev-public] [signoff] util-linux 2.19-4 & co
Hi, in util-linux 2.19-4 i disabled the experimental --enable-libmount-mount. FS#23014 kernel26 2.6.37.1-2 and mkinitcpio 0.6.8-2 has a versioned dependency for util-linux 2.19 to avoid the case when kernel initrd is regenerated without having any util-linux package. FS#23011 -- Ionuț
[2011-02-24 13:20:07 +0200] Ionuț Bîru:
in util-linux 2.19-4 i disabled the experimental --enable-libmount-mount. FS#23014
kernel26 2.6.37.1-2 and mkinitcpio 0.6.8-2 has a versioned dependency for util-linux 2.19 to avoid the case when kernel initrd is regenerated without having any util-linux package. FS#23011
I was about to signoff this (and kernel26-2.6.27.2-1) when I started experiencing (what seems like) hard drive failures; these are probably unrelated to the package updates, but, while I investigate, I thought this should probably be noted here. -- Gaetan
[2011-02-26 12:45:54 +0100] Gaetan Bisson:
[2011-02-24 13:20:07 +0200] Ionuț Bîru:
in util-linux 2.19-4 i disabled the experimental --enable-libmount-mount. FS#23014
kernel26 2.6.37.1-2 and mkinitcpio 0.6.8-2 has a versioned dependency for util-linux 2.19 to avoid the case when kernel initrd is regenerated without having any util-linux package. FS#23011
I was about to signoff this (and kernel26-2.6.27.2-1) when I started experiencing (what seems like) hard drive failures; these are probably unrelated to the package updates, but, while I investigate, I thought this should probably be noted here.
Nothing to do with the upgrade indeed; it was a purely hardware issue. Anyway, after testing them on a non-broken machine, I can signoff on util-linux & friends for i686. -- Gaetan
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 9:30 AM, Gaetan Bisson <bisson@archlinux.org> wrote:
[2011-02-26 12:45:54 +0100] Gaetan Bisson:
[2011-02-24 13:20:07 +0200] Ionuț Bîru:
in util-linux 2.19-4 i disabled the experimental --enable-libmount-mount. FS#23014
kernel26 2.6.37.1-2 and mkinitcpio 0.6.8-2 has a versioned dependency for util-linux 2.19 to avoid the case when kernel initrd is regenerated without having any util-linux package. FS#23011
I was about to signoff this (and kernel26-2.6.27.2-1) when I started experiencing (what seems like) hard drive failures; these are probably unrelated to the package updates, but, while I investigate, I thought this should probably be noted here.
Nothing to do with the upgrade indeed; it was a purely hardware issue.
Anyway, after testing them on a non-broken machine, I can signoff on util-linux & friends for i686.
Signoff x86_64; /tmp on tmpfs is back in df -h output and all is good. -Dan
On 02/27/2011 08:51 PM, Dan McGee wrote:
Signoff x86_64; /tmp on tmpfs is back in df -h output and all is good.
I'm going to move in couples of hours this packages: kernel26 2.6.37.2-1 kernel26-lts 2.6.32.29-3 mkinitcpio 0.6.8-2 util-linuxx 2.19-4 -- Ionuț
Op 1 mrt. 2011 22:24 schreef "Ionuț Bîru" <ibiru@archlinux.org> het volgende:
On 02/27/2011 08:51 PM, Dan McGee wrote:
Signoff x86_64; /tmp on tmpfs is back in df -h output and all is good.
I'm going to move in couples of hours this packages:
kernel26 2.6.37.2-1 kernel26-lts 2.6.32.29-3
mkinitcpio 0.6.8-2 util-linuxx 2.19-4
-- Ionuț
Can you move eeze-svn from community-testing as well together with util-linux. Thanks Ronald
On 03/01/2011 11:26 PM, Ronald van Haren wrote:
Op 1 mrt. 2011 22:24 schreef "Ionuț Bîru"<ibiru@archlinux.org> het volgende:
On 02/27/2011 08:51 PM, Dan McGee wrote:
Signoff x86_64; /tmp on tmpfs is back in df -h output and all is good.
I'm going to move in couples of hours this packages:
kernel26 2.6.37.2-1 kernel26-lts 2.6.32.29-3
mkinitcpio 0.6.8-2 util-linuxx 2.19-4
-- Ionuț
Can you move eeze-svn from community-testing as well together with util-linux.
Thanks
Ronald
all of them moved. -- Ionuț
On 02/03/11 21:57, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
On 03/01/2011 11:26 PM, Ronald van Haren wrote:
Op 1 mrt. 2011 22:24 schreef "Ionuț Bîru"<ibiru@archlinux.org> het volgende:
On 02/27/2011 08:51 PM, Dan McGee wrote:
Signoff x86_64; /tmp on tmpfs is back in df -h output and all is good.
I'm going to move in couples of hours this packages:
kernel26 2.6.37.2-1 kernel26-lts 2.6.32.29-3
mkinitcpio 0.6.8-2 util-linuxx 2.19-4
-- Ionuț
Can you move eeze-svn from community-testing as well together with util-linux.
Thanks
Ronald
all of them moved.
Is there something I am missing or should util-linux-ng be removed too? Allan
Am 02.03.2011 17:28, schrieb Allan McRae:
Is there something I am missing or should util-linux-ng be removed too?
Allan
Yes, it is obsolete and must go.
participants (6)
-
Allan McRae
-
Dan McGee
-
Gaetan Bisson
-
Ionuț Bîru
-
Ronald van Haren
-
Thomas Bächler