On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 9:30 AM, Gaetan Bisson wrote:

[2011-02-26 12:45:54 +0100] Gaetan Bisson:

...

[2011-02-24 13:20:07 +0200] Ionuț Bîru:

...

in util-linux 2.19-4 i disabled the experimental --enable-libmount-mount. FS#23014

kernel26 2.6.37.1-2 and mkinitcpio 0.6.8-2 has a versioned dependency for util-linux 2.19 to avoid the case when kernel initrd is regenerated without having any util-linux package. FS#23011

I was about to signoff this (and kernel26-2.6.27.2-1) when I started experiencing (what seems like) hard drive failures; these are probably unrelated to the package updates, but, while I investigate, I thought this should probably be noted here.

Nothing to do with the upgrade indeed; it was a purely hardware issue.

Anyway, after testing them on a non-broken machine, I can signoff on util-linux & friends for i686.

Signoff x86_64; /tmp on tmpfs is back in df -h output and all is good. -Dan

Op 1 mrt. 2011 22:24 schreef "Ionuț Bîru" het volgende:

On 02/27/2011 08:51 PM, Dan McGee wrote:

...

Signoff x86_64; /tmp on tmpfs is back in df -h output and all is good.

I'm going to move in couples of hours this packages:

kernel26 2.6.37.2-1 kernel26-lts 2.6.32.29-3

mkinitcpio 0.6.8-2 util-linuxx 2.19-4

-- Ionuț

Can you move eeze-svn from community-testing as well together with util-linux. Thanks Ronald

On 02/03/11 21:57, Ionuț Bîru wrote:

On 03/01/2011 11:26 PM, Ronald van Haren wrote:

...

Op 1 mrt. 2011 22:24 schreef "Ionuț Bîru" het volgende:

...

On 02/27/2011 08:51 PM, Dan McGee wrote:

...

Signoff x86_64; /tmp on tmpfs is back in df -h output and all is good.

I'm going to move in couples of hours this packages:

kernel26 2.6.37.2-1 kernel26-lts 2.6.32.29-3

mkinitcpio 0.6.8-2 util-linuxx 2.19-4

-- Ionuț

Can you move eeze-svn from community-testing as well together with util-linux.

Thanks

Ronald

all of them moved.

Is there something I am missing or should util-linux-ng be removed too? Allan

On 03/02/2011 06:45 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:

Am 02.03.2011 17:28, schrieb Allan McRae:

...

Is there something I am missing or should util-linux-ng be removed too?

Allan

Yes, it is obsolete and must go.

i forgot about it and noticed when i tried to update my chroots :) -- Ionuț