On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Dan McGee wrote:

On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 11:16 PM, Dan McGee wrote:

...

In the spirit of Eli making a bunch of patches for the AUR, I finally decided to sit down tonight and figure out why the heck namcap was sucking it up, and did a little code cleanup along the way. namcap.py is now a bit cleaner and separated into functions, and the real treat is namcap is a hell of a lot faster now that I found the bottleneck, which was the depends hook. The first 6 patches in this series lead up to the 7th, which is where the speed increase is found.

Let me know what you see, otherwise it would be cool to get this in and a new namcap release made, as it has rather dramatic effects with regards to speed.

If you don't like patches, you can get all this from my git tree as well: http://code.toofishes.net/cgit/dan/namcap.git/log/?h=working

-Dan

Dan McGee (7):  Rename 'tags' to 'namcap-tags'  Only process tags if necessary  Move extracted variable to the correct scope  Only do active_modules check once  Move PKGBUILD processing to a function  Move real package processing to a function  Make the depends module not suck

 Namcap/depends.py |  104 +++++++++++++++++++-------------  README            |   10 ++--  namcap-tags       |   65 ++++++++++++++++++++  namcap.py         |  173 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------  setup.py          |    2 +-  tags              |   65 --------------------  tests/tags-check  |    4 +-  7 files changed, 224 insertions(+), 199 deletions(-)  create mode 100644 namcap-tags  delete mode 100644 tags

Pinging the namcap maintainer?

It's listed as Jason, who's account was removed in the last run of deletions. Anyone interested in maintaining namcap? I thought Hugo showed some interest here.