[arch-dev-public] abs split and changes (was: Status questions)
On Jan 3, 2008 2:30 PM, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
On Jan 3, 2008 2:27 PM, eliott <eliott@cactuswax.net> wrote:
2. ABS move to rsync. There was some talk regarding moving ABS away from cvsup, towards a more generalized scm agnostic solution such as rsync. I had a proof of concept abs implementation using rsync functional, and sent patches to *someone* (memory is foggy..maybe it was Dan?). Is this still something on the general todo list?
You sent patches to me. Last status report I mentioned that we're waiting for 3.1 as it should split out abs into a new package, allowing us to make these changes at the same time.
http://projects.archlinux.org/git/?p=abs.git;a=summary git clone git://projects.archlinux.org/abs.git abs Anyone want to take this on? It really isn't a high maintenance thing. It has been split into its own repository now, and anyone can take it and run with Eliott's idea (which I'll give a +1). It really shouldn't be too much of a burden on anyone, and you get that awesome feeling of leading a project (even if it is small!). I'm willing to help out, but my "full-time" duties will always tend to be with pacman so this might not get as much love from me as someone else could give it. -Dan
On Jan 3, 2008 2:55 PM, Dan McGee <dpmcgee@gmail.com> wrote:
On Jan 3, 2008 2:30 PM, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
On Jan 3, 2008 2:27 PM, eliott <eliott@cactuswax.net> wrote:
2. ABS move to rsync. There was some talk regarding moving ABS away from cvsup, towards a more generalized scm agnostic solution such as rsync. I had a proof of concept abs implementation using rsync functional, and sent patches to *someone* (memory is foggy..maybe it was Dan?). Is this still something on the general todo list?
You sent patches to me. Last status report I mentioned that we're waiting for 3.1 as it should split out abs into a new package, allowing us to make these changes at the same time.
http://projects.archlinux.org/git/?p=abs.git;a=summary git clone git://projects.archlinux.org/abs.git abs
Anyone want to take this on? It really isn't a high maintenance thing. It has been split into its own repository now, and anyone can take it and run with Eliott's idea (which I'll give a +1). It really shouldn't be too much of a burden on anyone, and you get that awesome feeling of leading a project (even if it is small!). I'm willing to help out, but my "full-time" duties will always tend to be with pacman so this might not get as much love from me as someone else could give it.
Cheers! And thanks. I have the "patches" (which is, in fact, a tarball of actual files, heh) that I can apply. I am busy most of the night but can likely get to this later - Eliott, Dan, would you like me to forward this on to you guys in case one of you are faster? It'd be nice if we can get some more hands in the code around here. Right now it seems the only projects moving are the ones spearheaded by Dan and/or Eliott and I may have made some recent changes to the initscripts stuff, but it was more merging other people's patches. I'm *sure* we have more coders than this, so it'd be nice to get other people doing some work on this. If that isn't feasible, we're going to have to bring on more developers in this capacity, otherwise these projects are going to stagnate. What it means to take ownership of ABS: * You gain full control of the code base * You release the future "abs" package * You make most of the decisions regarding ABS (though, hefty ones should be discussed, it's only fair). Anyone willing to swing the bat?
On Jan 3, 2008 4:04 PM, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
On Jan 3, 2008 2:55 PM, Dan McGee <dpmcgee@gmail.com> wrote:
On Jan 3, 2008 2:30 PM, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
On Jan 3, 2008 2:27 PM, eliott <eliott@cactuswax.net> wrote:
2. ABS move to rsync. There was some talk regarding moving ABS away from cvsup, towards a more generalized scm agnostic solution such as rsync. I had a proof of concept abs implementation using rsync functional, and sent patches to *someone* (memory is foggy..maybe it was Dan?). Is this still something on the general todo list?
You sent patches to me. Last status report I mentioned that we're waiting for 3.1 as it should split out abs into a new package, allowing us to make these changes at the same time.
http://projects.archlinux.org/git/?p=abs.git;a=summary git clone git://projects.archlinux.org/abs.git abs
Anyone want to take this on? It really isn't a high maintenance thing. It has been split into its own repository now, and anyone can take it and run with Eliott's idea (which I'll give a +1). It really shouldn't be too much of a burden on anyone, and you get that awesome feeling of leading a project (even if it is small!). I'm willing to help out, but my "full-time" duties will always tend to be with pacman so this might not get as much love from me as someone else could give it.
Cheers! And thanks. I have the "patches" (which is, in fact, a tarball of actual files, heh) that I can apply. I am busy most of the night but can likely get to this later - Eliott, Dan, would you like me to forward this on to you guys in case one of you are faster?
It'd be nice if we can get some more hands in the code around here. Right now it seems the only projects moving are the ones spearheaded by Dan and/or Eliott and I may have made some recent changes to the initscripts stuff, but it was more merging other people's patches.
I'm *sure* we have more coders than this, so it'd be nice to get other people doing some work on this. If that isn't feasible, we're going to have to bring on more developers in this capacity, otherwise these projects are going to stagnate.
What it means to take ownership of ABS: * You gain full control of the code base * You release the future "abs" package * You make most of the decisions regarding ABS (though, hefty ones should be discussed, it's only fair).
Anyone willing to swing the bat?
I am a coder by profession. I just do packaging right now for Arch. I've wanted, for a while, to get involved in something greater than packaging. I contributed a bit to pacman, but only a bit. I want to help with the website stuff, but I know zero django and zero python. I've been feeling kinda burnt-out lately too, so I'm worried if I dive into this I'll lose interest halfway through and end up being no help at all. I could take up ABS, I suppose, though I don't have any grand super plans, ideas, or roadmaps for it. *shrug* I'm certainly decent at maintenance, however, based on my tendancy to handle packages, so I could at least do that for ABS for a while, until inspiration hits. :P
On Jan 3, 2008 4:18 PM, Travis Willard <travis@archlinux.org> wrote:
On Jan 3, 2008 4:04 PM, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
On Jan 3, 2008 2:30 PM, Aaron Griffin < aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
On Jan 3, 2008 2:27 PM, eliott <eliott@cactuswax.net> wrote:
2. ABS move to rsync. There was some talk regarding moving ABS away from cvsup, towards a more generalized scm agnostic solution such as rsync. I had a
concept abs implementation using rsync functional, and sent
On Jan 3, 2008 2:55 PM, Dan McGee <dpmcgee@gmail.com> wrote: proof of patches to
*someone* (memory is foggy..maybe it was Dan?). Is this still something on the general todo list?
You sent patches to me. Last status report I mentioned that we're waiting for 3.1 as it should split out abs into a new package, allowing us to make these changes at the same time.
http://projects.archlinux.org/git/?p=abs.git;a=summary git clone git://projects.archlinux.org/abs.git abs
Anyone want to take this on? It really isn't a high maintenance thing. It has been split into its own repository now, and anyone can take it and run with Eliott's idea (which I'll give a +1). It really shouldn't be too much of a burden on anyone, and you get that awesome feeling of leading a project (even if it is small!). I'm willing to help out, but
my "full-time" duties will always tend to be with pacman so this might not get as much love from me as someone else could give it.
Cheers! And thanks. I have the "patches" (which is, in fact, a tarball of actual files, heh) that I can apply. I am busy most of the night but can likely get to this later - Eliott, Dan, would you like me to forward this on to you guys in case one of you are faster?
It'd be nice if we can get some more hands in the code around here. Right now it seems the only projects moving are the ones spearheaded by Dan and/or Eliott and I may have made some recent changes to the initscripts stuff, but it was more merging other people's patches.
I'm *sure* we have more coders than this, so it'd be nice to get other people doing some work on this. If that isn't feasible, we're going to have to bring on more developers in this capacity, otherwise these projects are going to stagnate.
What it means to take ownership of ABS: * You gain full control of the code base * You release the future "abs" package * You make most of the decisions regarding ABS (though, hefty ones should be discussed, it's only fair).
Anyone willing to swing the bat?
I am a coder by profession. I just do packaging right now for Arch. I've wanted, for a while, to get involved in something greater than packaging. I contributed a bit to pacman, but only a bit.
I want to help with the website stuff, but I know zero django and zero python. I've been feeling kinda burnt-out lately too, so I'm worried if I dive into this I'll lose interest halfway through and end up being no help at all.
I could take up ABS, I suppose, though I don't have any grand super plans, ideas, or roadmaps for it. *shrug* I'm certainly decent at maintenance, however, based on my tendancy to handle packages, so I could at least do that for ABS for a while, until inspiration hits. :P
Bah - that sounded so weak. The message I intended to convey: Yes, I will take over the ABS project. Just don't expect me to come at it with a ton of great ideas right out of the gate. ;)
Bah - that sounded so weak. The message I intended to convey:
Yes, I will take over the ABS project. Just don't expect me to come at it with a ton of great ideas right out of the gate. ;)
I am willing to take it over as well, since I have my meat hooks all over the backend. However, I am *more than* willing to just help out with the project, if someone else drives. In fact, I would shit myself with happy flowers and panda bears. That being said, if nobody else wants to drive, I surely can (and will take any help i can get). My initial email was to see if there was any interest, and see if anything had been done since I last heard about it.
On Jan 3, 2008 4:51 PM, eliott <eliott@cactuswax.net> wrote:
Bah - that sounded so weak. The message I intended to convey:
Yes, I will take over the ABS project. Just don't expect me to come at it with a ton of great ideas right out of the gate. ;)
I am willing to take it over as well, since I have my meat hooks all over the backend. However, I am *more than* willing to just help out with the project, if someone else drives. In fact, I would shit myself with happy flowers and panda bears.
I drive - you get shotgun.
On Jan 3, 2008 3:53 PM, Travis Willard <travis@archlinux.org> wrote:
On Jan 3, 2008 4:51 PM, eliott <eliott@cactuswax.net> wrote:
Bah - that sounded so weak. The message I intended to convey:
Yes, I will take over the ABS project. Just don't expect me to come at
it
with a ton of great ideas right out of the gate. ;)
I am willing to take it over as well, since I have my meat hooks all over the backend. However, I am *more than* willing to just help out with the project, if someone else drives. In fact, I would shit myself with happy flowers and panda bears.
I drive - you get shotgun.
Eliott, are you on pacman-dev? Discussion there on anything would probably be our best venue, with an [abs] prefix on the mails. If you are not on the list, we'll just ensure you get CC'ed in on anything. Aaron or Eliott, can you add an abs-git group sometime on gerolde and put Travis, the two of you, and I in the group? And then chown the repo to travis.abs-git? Thanks in advance. -Dan
Eliott, are you on pacman-dev? Discussion there on anything would probably be our best venue, with an [abs] prefix on the mails. If you are not on the list, we'll just ensure you get CC'ed in on anything.
Not currently, but I can surely add myself.
Aaron or Eliott, can you add an abs-git group sometime on gerolde and put Travis, the two of you, and I in the group? And then chown the repo to travis.abs-git? Thanks in advance.
sure thing.
On Jan 3, 2008 3:51 PM, eliott <eliott@cactuswax.net> wrote:
However, I am *more than* willing to just help out with the project, if someone else drives. In fact, I would shit myself with happy flowers and panda bears.
I just printed this. You will hang on my office wall. On Jan 3, 2008 3:58 PM, Dan McGee <dpmcgee@gmail.com> wrote:
Aaron or Eliott, can you add an abs-git group sometime on gerolde and put Travis, the two of you, and I in the group? And then chown the repo to travis.abs-git? Thanks in advance.
Just because I'm anal, the colon spec is probably better to use when you specify these things 8) Travis, I will forward along Eliott's ABS changes
Just because I'm anal, the colon spec is probably better to use when you specify these things 8)
HAHA! I said the same thing to Dan over jabber. lolz @dan: your face! ;)
participants (4)
-
Aaron Griffin
-
Dan McGee
-
eliott
-
Travis Willard