[arch-dev-public] ISO 2008.03-4 release status update
Hey guys, following packages i would like to see in core: pending signoffs and move to base: initscripts (showstopper!)? Bump to 2008.03-3 with the last fix for correct udev startup. /dev/pts and /dev/shm are created earlier in rc.sysinit which causes double creating it and causes errors thrown to console. udev-118-7 (showstopper!)? waiting for signoff, load-modules.sh needed a small fix. e2fsprogs? waiting for signoff on x86_64 ntfs-3g? waiting for signoff on x86_64 grub? it would add gpt support http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/9864 which adds macbook support and greater sizes as 2TB support waiting for signoff cryptsetup? waiting for signoff, Thomas is the only one using it! klibc-module-init-tools? signed off, waiting for new mkinitcpio or can this move in without mkinitcpio? klibc-extras? signed off, waiting for new mkinitcpio or can this move in without mkinitcpio? kbd/klibc-kbd/mkinitcpio? mkinitcpio needs a small fix in resume hook. kbd and klibc-kbd waiting for signoff and depend on new mkinitcpio. http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/9862 Roman wants to fix this in the evening. perl? Any progress? When do you want to move it to core? Any date planned? delayed package moves due to rebuilds and issues: gcc build-toolchain libtool any other comments? greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tpowa@archlinux.org
On Tue, 2008-03-18 at 20:48 +0100, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
Hey guys, following packages i would like to see in core:
pending signoffs and move to base: initscripts (showstopper!)? Bump to 2008.03-3 with the last fix for correct udev startup. /dev/pts and /dev/shm are created earlier in rc.sysinit which causes double creating it and causes errors thrown to console.
udev-118-7 (showstopper!)? waiting for signoff, load-modules.sh needed a small fix.
e2fsprogs? waiting for signoff on x86_64
ntfs-3g? waiting for signoff on x86_64
grub? it would add gpt support http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/9864 which adds macbook support and greater sizes as 2TB support waiting for signoff
cryptsetup? waiting for signoff, Thomas is the only one using it!
klibc-module-init-tools? signed off, waiting for new mkinitcpio or can this move in without mkinitcpio?
klibc-extras? signed off, waiting for new mkinitcpio or can this move in without mkinitcpio?
kbd/klibc-kbd/mkinitcpio? mkinitcpio needs a small fix in resume hook. kbd and klibc-kbd waiting for signoff and depend on new mkinitcpio. http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/9862 Roman wants to fix this in the evening.
perl? Any progress? When do you want to move it to core? Any date planned?
I've had no problems with i686. I haven't heard anything from the x86_64 camp except for the perlbin.sh script I forgot to commit. I'll move in a few days if I don't hear anything.
delayed package moves due to rebuilds and issues: gcc build-toolchain libtool
any other comments?
greetings tpowa -- K. Piche <kpiche@rogers.com>
On Tue, 18 Mar 2008, K. Piche wrote:
perl? Any progress? When do you want to move it to core? Any date planned?
I've had no problems with i686. I haven't heard anything from the x86_64 camp except for the perlbin.sh script I forgot to commit. I'll move in a few days if I don't hear anything.
About perlbin.sh, sorry for not getting back to you. I realized that it was included in the i686 package so I grabbed it from there. Perl-wise, the x86_64 testing repo is in sync with i686. Also, I use testing repo on my main machine (x86_64) and haven't experienced any problems. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Am Mittwoch, 19. März 2008 schrieb Eric Belanger:
On Tue, 18 Mar 2008, K. Piche wrote:
perl? Any progress? When do you want to move it to core? Any date planned?
I've had no problems with i686. I haven't heard anything from the x86_64 camp except for the perlbin.sh script I forgot to commit. I'll move in a few days if I don't hear anything.
About perlbin.sh, sorry for not getting back to you. I realized that it was included in the i686 package so I grabbed it from there. Perl-wise, the x86_64 testing repo is in sync with i686. Also, I use testing repo on my main machine (x86_64) and haven't experienced any problems.
So to summarize, perl is ready on both arches, so you can start moving it in. If all works well I would like to create ISOs this weekend. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tpowa@archlinux.org
participants (3)
-
Eric Belanger
-
K. Piche
-
Tobias Powalowski