[arch-dev-public] [patch] adding support for community svn to archco
-- Ionut
I just noticed this patch was added at http://projects.archlinux.org/devtools.git/commit/?id=0346db0ff79254e720d2da... but I somehow don't get it. ;-) I have no idea how this should work. "svn info" only works within a working copy which you don't have when you use archco. And if you would have such a wroking copy you could just use "svn up $pkgname"; no need to use co or pass the complete URL. In addition to this I don't know how this should add support for community svn; there is still communityco for this. Pierre -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
On 02/11/2010 09:19 AM, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
I just noticed this patch was added at http://projects.archlinux.org/devtools.git/commit/?id=0346db0ff79254e720d2da... but I somehow don't get it. ;-)
I have no idea how this should work. "svn info" only works within a working copy which you don't have when you use archco. And if you would have such a wroking copy you could just use "svn up $pkgname"; no need to use co or pass the complete URL.
In addition to this I don't know how this should add support for community svn; there is still communityco for this.
Pierre
the point was to use the same command on every svn-packages directory. basically i do svn co -N $gerolde/svn-packages and for community svn co -N $aur/svn-packages and i can do archco in both directories. But if it wasn't meant to be like that, revert it. -- Ionut
Am Donnerstag, 11. Februar 2010 12:26:38 schrieb Ionut Biru:
the point was to use the same command on every svn-packages directory.
basically i do svn co -N $gerolde/svn-packages and for community svn co -N $aur/svn-packages and i can do archco in both directories. But if it wasn't meant to be like that, revert it.
Quoting myself:
This reverts commit 0346db0ff79254e720d2da84ba60172fce8d1b76.
This commit changed the expected behaviour of archco and truned it into a more complex alias of "svn up <package>".
We might still want to rethink the whole archco stuff as it's not ideal atm; especially if you checkout more than one package. -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 6:13 AM, Pierre Schmitz
Am Donnerstag, 11. Februar 2010 12:26:38 schrieb Ionut Biru:
the point was to use the same command on every svn-packages directory.
basically i do svn co -N $gerolde/svn-packages and for community svn co -N $aur/svn-packages and i can do archco in both directories. But if it wasn't meant to be like that, revert it.
Quoting myself:
This reverts commit 0346db0ff79254e720d2da84ba60172fce8d1b76.
This commit changed the expected behaviour of archco and truned it into a more complex alias of "svn up <package>".
We might still want to rethink the whole archco stuff as it's not ideal atm; especially if you checkout more than one package.
The bare checkout is definitely the way I've had most success with. `svn co --depth=empty` I think it is on the root of the packages/ tree you want, and then just `svn up pkgname` inside to start tracking files for that packge. -Dan
participants (3)
-
Dan McGee
-
Ionut Biru
-
Pierre Schmitz