in testing for both architectures. just an update.
-Andy
Sunday 30 December 2007, Andreas Radke wrote: | in testing for both architectures. just an update. | | -Andy
x86_64 ok
- D
Am Sonntag, 30. Dezember 2007 11:40:53 schrieb Andreas Radke:
in testing for both architectures. just an update.
-Andy
signoff (both arches)
btw: man pages are still broken when using utf8, or do we have a fix for this?
2007/12/30, Pierre Schmitz pierre@archlinux.de:
Am Sonntag, 30. Dezember 2007 11:40:53 schrieb Andreas Radke:
in testing for both architectures. just an update.
-Andy
signoff (both arches)
btw: man pages are still broken when using utf8, or do we have a fix for this?
According to comments on http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/7477 we should replace man with man-db.
On Jan 8, 2008 6:07 AM, Roman Kyrylych roman.kyrylych@gmail.com wrote:
2007/12/30, Pierre Schmitz pierre@archlinux.de:
Am Sonntag, 30. Dezember 2007 11:40:53 schrieb Andreas Radke:
in testing for both architectures. just an update.
-Andy
signoff (both arches)
btw: man pages are still broken when using utf8, or do we have a fix for this?
According to comments on http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/7477 we should replace man with man-db.
I'm confused. If man-db uses bdb instead of flat files... what happens to man pages?
2008/1/8, Aaron Griffin aaronmgriffin@gmail.com:
On Jan 8, 2008 6:07 AM, Roman Kyrylych roman.kyrylych@gmail.com wrote:
2007/12/30, Pierre Schmitz pierre@archlinux.de:
Am Sonntag, 30. Dezember 2007 11:40:53 schrieb Andreas Radke:
in testing for both architectures. just an update.
-Andy
signoff (both arches)
btw: man pages are still broken when using utf8, or do we have a fix for this?
According to comments on http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/7477 we should replace man with man-db.
I'm confused. If man-db uses bdb instead of flat files... what happens to man pages?
From what I've read in their manual in bzr - it still uses ordinary manpages from /usr/share/man/*, only the whatis database, cache etc. are stored in bdb.
arch-dev-public@lists.archlinux.org