[arch-dev-public] Signoff bumps
I got a few emails regarding packages stuck in testing without signoffs: mdadm, cracklib, jfsutils, sdparm, pcmciautils These look like relatively lesser used packages... so if no one will signoff on them, you can consider me signed off. (sdparm runs fine, heh) Any other packages stuck in testing right now? Feel free to use this thread to point out packages spending too long in testing Cheers, Aaron
Aaron Griffin wrote:
Any other packages stuck in testing right now? Feel free to use this thread to point out packages spending too long in testing
I will point out boost. It has been there for a long, long time now and I do not know of anything holding it up. Allan
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008, Allan McRae wrote:
Aaron Griffin wrote:
Any other packages stuck in testing right now? Feel free to use this thread to point out packages spending too long in testing
I will point out boost. It has been there for a long, long time now and I do not know of anything holding it up.
Allan
boost has a bug: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/10998 -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Eric Belanger schrieb:
I will point out boost. It has been there for a long, long time now and I do not know of anything holding it up.
Allan
boost has a bug: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/10998
Also, boost needs this fix, it throws some ambiguity errors when compiling pokerth (and other apps): http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/attachment/ticket/1615/0001-date_time-gcc-4....
On Thu, 11 Sep 2008, Aaron Griffin wrote:
I got a few emails regarding packages stuck in testing without signoffs:
mdadm, cracklib, jfsutils, sdparm, pcmciautils
These look like relatively lesser used packages... so if no one will signoff on them, you can consider me signed off. (sdparm runs fine, heh)
Some of them are already signed off via the web signoff. It's just a question of moving them to core.
Any other packages stuck in testing right now? Feel free to use this thread to point out packages spending too long in testing
Cheers, Aaron
pcre is missing a signoff for x86_64 -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Aaron Griffin schrieb:
I got a few emails regarding packages stuck in testing without signoffs:
mdadm, cracklib, jfsutils, sdparm, pcmciautils
pccardctl eject works, so I guess this is a signoff for pcmciautils (x86_64).
participants (4)
-
Aaron Griffin
-
Allan McRae
-
Eric Belanger
-
Thomas Bächler