[arch-dev-public] [draft] Install media 2012.08.04 released
The August snapshot of our live and install media comes with updated packages and the following changes on top of the <a href="https://www.archlinux.org/news/install-media-20120715-released/">previous iso image</a>: <ul> <li>GRUB 2.0 instead of the legacy 0.9 version is available.</li> <li>The <a href="https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Installation_Guide">Installation Guide</a> can be found at /root/install.txt</li> <li>ZSH with GRML's config is used as interactive shell to provide a user friendly and more convenient environment. This includes completion support for pacstrap, arch-chroot, pacman and most other tools.</li> <li>The network daemon is started by default which will automatically setup your network when dhcp is available.</li> </ul> Note that all these changes only affect the live system and not the base system you install using pacstrap. --- Any thing I missed here or unclear? Let me know. So far we are ready to go; archiso has been updated and I pushed a package into [extra]. The only thing missing is a small patch for arch-chroot that should be applied: http://paste.xinu.at/ktF/ It's only been 20 days since the last release, but I'd like to move to a schedule where a new iso is released at the beginning (first week) of a month. It's still quite a list of changes; not even mentioned a few changes to archiso and the install scripts. Greetings, Pierre -- Pierre Schmitz, https://pierre-schmitz.com
On 08/04/2012 01:06 AM, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
The August snapshot of our live and install media comes with updated packages and the following changes on top of the <a href="https://www.archlinux.org/news/install-media-20120715-released/">previous iso image</a>: <ul> <li>GRUB 2.0 instead of the legacy 0.9 version is available.</li> <li>The <a href="https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Installation_Guide">Installation Guide</a> can be found at /root/install.txt</li> <li>ZSH with GRML's config is used as interactive shell to provide a user friendly and more convenient environment. This includes completion support for pacstrap, arch-chroot, pacman and most other tools.</li> <li>The network daemon is started by default which will automatically setup your network when dhcp is available.</li> </ul> Note that all these changes only affect the live system and not the base system you install using pacstrap.
--- Any thing I missed here or unclear? Let me know. So far we are ready to go; archiso has been updated and I pushed a package into [extra]. The only thing missing is a small patch for arch-chroot that should be applied: http://paste.xinu.at/ktF/
It's only been 20 days since the last release, but I'd like to move to a schedule where a new iso is released at the beginning (first week) of a month. It's still quite a list of changes; not even mentioned a few changes to archiso and the install scripts.
Why not follow the kernel release? The iso is much more useful having the latest kernel available.
Greetings,
Pierre
-- Ionuț
On Sat, Aug 04, 2012 at 02:20:41AM +0300, Ionut Biru wrote:
On 08/04/2012 01:06 AM, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
The August snapshot of our live and install media comes with updated packages and the following changes on top of the <a href="https://www.archlinux.org/news/install-media-20120715-released/">previous iso image</a>: <ul> <li>GRUB 2.0 instead of the legacy 0.9 version is available.</li> <li>The <a href="https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Installation_Guide">Installation Guide</a> can be found at /root/install.txt</li> <li>ZSH with GRML's config is used as interactive shell to provide a user friendly and more convenient environment. This includes completion support for pacstrap, arch-chroot, pacman and most other tools.</li> <li>The network daemon is started by default which will automatically setup your network when dhcp is available.</li> </ul> Note that all these changes only affect the live system and not the base system you install using pacstrap.
--- Any thing I missed here or unclear? Let me know. So far we are ready to go; archiso has been updated and I pushed a package into [extra]. The only thing missing is a small patch for arch-chroot that should be applied: http://paste.xinu.at/ktF/
It's only been 20 days since the last release, but I'd like to move to a schedule where a new iso is released at the beginning (first week) of a month. It's still quite a list of changes; not even mentioned a few changes to archiso and the install scripts.
Why not follow the kernel release? The iso is much more useful having the latest kernel available.
I've not seen us ever push a .0 kernel into [core] and you'd like to see it on an ISO? You'll get 3.5 next month. d
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Pierre Schmitz <pierre@archlinux.de> wrote:
The August snapshot of our live and install media comes with updated packages and the following changes on top of the <a href="https://www.archlinux.org/news/install-media-20120715-released/">previous iso image</a>: <ul> <li>GRUB 2.0 instead of the legacy 0.9 version is available.</li> <li>The <a href="https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Installation_Guide">Installation Guide</a> can be found at /root/install.txt</li> <li>ZSH with GRML's config is used as interactive shell to provide a user friendly and more convenient environment. This includes completion support for pacstrap, arch-chroot, pacman and most other tools.</li> <li>The network daemon is started by default which will automatically setup your network when dhcp is available.</li> </ul> Note that all these changes only affect the live system and not the base system you install using pacstrap.
What was the rationale for not using markdown syntax? I've edited it to look the exact same and not be inline HTML; please prefer markdown in all cases that it can be used. -Dan
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 6:37 PM, Dan McGee <dpmcgee@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Pierre Schmitz <pierre@archlinux.de> wrote:
The August snapshot of our live and install media comes with updated packages and the following changes on top of the <a href="https://www.archlinux.org/news/install-media-20120715-released/">previous iso image</a>: <ul> <li>GRUB 2.0 instead of the legacy 0.9 version is available.</li> <li>The <a href="https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Installation_Guide">Installation Guide</a> can be found at /root/install.txt</li> <li>ZSH with GRML's config is used as interactive shell to provide a user friendly and more convenient environment. This includes completion support for pacstrap, arch-chroot, pacman and most other tools.</li> <li>The network daemon is started by default which will automatically setup your network when dhcp is available.</li> </ul> Note that all these changes only affect the live system and not the base system you install using pacstrap.
What was the rationale for not using markdown syntax? I've edited it to look the exact same and not be inline HTML; please prefer markdown in all cases that it can be used.
Note: "ISO" is an acronym; "iso" is not a word. Here is the markdown version I just reposted: The August snapshot of our live and install media comes with updated packages and the following changes on top of the [previous ISO image](/news/install-media-20120715-released/): * GRUB 2.0 instead of the legacy 0.9 version is available. * The [Installation Guide](https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php) can be found at _/root/install.txt_. * ZSH with [Grml's configuration](http://grml.org/zsh/) is used as interactive shell to provide a user friendly and more convenient environment. This includes completion support for pacstrap, arch-chroot, pacman and most other tools. * The network daemon is started by default which will automatically setup your network if DHCP is available. Note that all these changes only affect the live system and not the base system you install using pacstrap. The ISO image can be downloaded from our [download page](/download/). The next snapshot is scheduled for September.
Am 05.08.2012 01:37, schrieb Dan McGee:
What was the rationale for not using markdown syntax? I've edited it to look the exact same and not be inline HTML; please prefer markdown in all cases that it can be used.
If it does make a difference I'll have a look at markdown next time; thought it would end up as HTML in the DB anyway. And I am way more familar with HTML; and I think last time I tried there were some problems when syntax was nested withn a list. -- Pierre Schmitz, https://pierre-schmitz.com
participants (4)
-
Dan McGee
-
Dave Reisner
-
Ionut Biru
-
Pierre Schmitz