[arch-dev-public] Mozilla status
On Jan 18, 2008 9:28 AM, Jan de Groot <jan@jgc.homeip.net> wrote:
BTW: How do we handle the mozilla /usr move, is it done yet, or do we still have a big mess (AFAIK half of mozilla was moved to extra on i686 while it's still in testing for amd64 :X)
According to the list here: https://dev.archlinux.org/todo/44/ the recompiles are complete. Any reason we can't move these to [extra]? Jan, you mentioned that some packages were moved to extra already, do you know which ones? If I get no objections, I'd like to push these packages to extra tonight.
Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Jan 18, 2008 9:28 AM, Jan de Groot <jan@jgc.homeip.net> wrote:
BTW: How do we handle the mozilla /usr move, is it done yet, or do we still have a big mess (AFAIK half of mozilla was moved to extra on i686 while it's still in testing for amd64 :X)
According to the list here: https://dev.archlinux.org/todo/44/ the recompiles are complete.
Yes, but something about the flashplugin was odd. I rebuilt it but due to a static - not version dependend - release repository at Adobe, I wasn't able to build a version that works with non-gtk ie. non-gecko browsers. So, I would say for as long as flashplugin cannot be moved down to extra, all geckos must stay in testing. Then again, I don't know if its maintainer was able to roll it back...
Any reason we can't move these to [extra]? Jan, you mentioned that some packages were moved to extra already, do you know which ones?
Thunderbird has already been moved to /usr in extra as there are no binary plugins in our repos as far as I know.
If I get no objections, I'd like to push these packages to extra tonight.
I'll push them as soon as I get a sign-off for all the xulrunner packages. Cheers, Alex
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: arch-dev-public-bounces@archlinux.org [mailto:arch-dev-public- bounces@archlinux.org] Namens Alexander Baldeck Verzonden: maandag 21 januari 2008 15:17 Aan: Public mailing list for ArchLinux development Onderwerp: Re: [arch-dev-public] Mozilla status
Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Jan 18, 2008 9:28 AM, Jan de Groot <jan@jgc.homeip.net> wrote:
BTW: How do we handle the mozilla /usr move, is it done yet, or do we still have a big mess (AFAIK half of mozilla was moved to extra on i686 while it's still in testing for amd64 :X)
According to the list here: https://dev.archlinux.org/todo/44/ the recompiles are complete.
Yes, but something about the flashplugin was odd. I rebuilt it but due to a static - not version dependend - release repository at Adobe, I wasn't able to build a version that works with non-gtk ie. non-gecko browsers. So, I would say for as long as flashplugin cannot be moved down to extra, all geckos must stay in testing. Then again, I don't know if its maintainer was able to roll it back...
What error do you get when starting the new flash from konqueror or opera? Maybe we can workaround their broken binary with a patch in GTK and/or Glib again...
participants (3)
-
Aaron Griffin
-
Alexander Baldeck
-
Jan de Groot