[arch-dev-public] cleanup testing repo
We should try to clean up testing faster. I want to start the next big rebuild session for "db". Before that we should sort out what packages can be moved or deleted completely or what holds it back. Here's the current ftp list for i686-testing: 236K Oct 9 2007 ivtv-utils-1.0.2-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz 96K Nov 10 2007 dssi-0.9.1-3-i686.pkg.tar.gz 300K Nov 11 2007 hpoj-0.91-12-i686.pkg.tar.gz 142K Nov 11 2007 pinentry-0.7.3-2-i686.pkg.tar.gz 79K Nov 18 2007 liborigin-20070926-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz 458K Nov 20 2007 exim-4.68-4-i686.pkg.tar.gz 916K Nov 27 2007 kismet-2007_10_R1-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz 50K Nov 28 2007 libdownload-1.3-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz 91K Dec 4 2007 motion-3.2.9-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz 35K Dec 7 2007 eigen-1.0.5.svn744389-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz 8.7M Dec 18 17:20 mplayer-svn-25449-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz 6.3M Jan 14 20:07 k3b-1.0.4-2-i686.pkg.tar.gz 187K Feb 4 15:58 nasm-2.01-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz 11K Feb 13 04:54 netcfg-2.0.6-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz 845K Mar 6 09:12 redland-1.0.7-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz 3.0K Mar 27 14:43 mkbootcd-2008.03-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz 2.5K Mar 27 15:03 mksyslinux-2008.03-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz 2.4K Mar 27 15:03 mkpxelinux-2008.03-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz 126K Mar 31 15:47 archboot-2008.03-2-i686.pkg.tar.gz 11M Apr 2 18:11 digikam-0.9.3-2-i686.pkg.tar.gz 1.1M Apr 2 18:12 gimp-ufraw-0.13-2-i686.pkg.tar.gz 958K Apr 2 18:12 gwenview-1.4.2-2-i686.pkg.tar.gz 9.1M Apr 2 18:14 kipi-plugins-0.1.5beta1-3-i686.pkg.tar.gz 1.7M Apr 4 23:00 exiv2-0.16-2-i686.pkg.tar.gz 67K Apr 4 23:01 libkexiv2-0.1.6-3-i686.pkg.tar.gz 742K Apr 8 02:35 openssh-5.0p1-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz 12K Apr 21 09:38 xf86-video-ark-0.7.0-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz 62K Apr 21 09:38 xf86-video-apm-1.2.0-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz 74K Apr 21 09:38 xf86-video-chips-1.2.0-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz 3.5M Apr 21 09:38 xf86-video-ati-6.8.0-3-i686.pkg.tar.gz 942K Apr 21 09:38 xf86-video-savage-2.2.0-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz 903K Apr 21 09:38 xf86-video-tdfx-1.4.0-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz 894K Apr 21 09:38 xf86-video-trident-1.3.0-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz 91K Apr 21 09:38 xf86-video-unichrome-0.2.6-7-i686.pkg.tar.gz 146K Apr 21 09:38 xf86-video-via-0.2.2-4-i686.pkg.tar.gz 95K May 4 18:08 dnsmasq-2.41-2-i686.pkg.tar.gz 118K May 4 18:31 sudo-1.6.9p15-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz 15K May 21 00:28 testing.db.tar.gz.orig 52K May 23 20:37 mlocate-0.20-2-i686.pkg.tar.gz 736K May 24 06:08 psi-i18n-0.12-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz 2.8M May 24 06:08 psi-0.12.svn1160-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz 9.0M May 24 06:08 lyx-1.5.5-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz 19M May 31 15:18 qt-4.4.0-3-i686.pkg.tar.gz 895K May 31 15:29 strigi-0.5.9.svn813921-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz 798K May 31 15:29 soprano-2.0.98-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz 65K May 31 15:29 libassuan-1.0.4-2-i686.pkg.tar.gz 1.1M Jun 6 17:59 qca-2.0.0.svn817733-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz 21M Jun 6 18:36 kdelibs-3.5.9-4-i686.pkg.tar.gz 13K Jun 17 07:37 filesystem-2008.06-2-i686.pkg.tar.gz 4.1M Jun 17 09:36 man-pages-3.00-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz Please also look into x86_64 directory. Is there something where I can help out? -Andy
On Tue, 17 Jun 2008, Andreas Radke wrote:
We should try to clean up testing faster. I want to start the next big rebuild session for "db". Before that we should sort out what packages can be moved or deleted completely or what holds it back.
I asked dolby to make up lists for a testing repo cleanup that I wanted to do. I haven't heard from him yet. I guess he was just busy with the bugtracker. I was very busy as well. I posted a few comments below.
Here's the current ftp list for i686-testing:
1.7M Apr 4 23:00 exiv2-0.16-2-i686.pkg.tar.gz
That exiv2 has a soname bump. All packages that needed a rebuilt (haven't check the bug tracker) are in testing as well. They've been there for a couple of months. Neri: Can they be moved to extra?
742K Apr 8 02:35 openssh-5.0p1-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz
openssh-5.0p1-1 is already in core. this can be removed from testing.
118K May 4 18:31 sudo-1.6.9p15-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz
Paul and I forgot to start the signoff thread for it. It's now out-of-date.
52K May 23 20:37 mlocate-0.20-2-i686.pkg.tar.gz
has been signoffed. I asked for status in its signoff thread today.
mplayer-svn-25449-1
Tom: are you still maintaining it? This is a couple of month old. The current package in unstable is even older. IMO, it should be removed if it's not actively maintained anymore. A couple months old svn package is pointless. BTW, I was working on a gpm soname bump. The x86_64 packages are ready and I was planning to move them in testing tonight with the i686 ones to follow later tonight or tomorrow. At least one of the rebuilt package for gpm also depends on db. We might not want to mix the 2 soname bump and do the db rebuild when the gpm one will be removed from testing. I was planning to keep the gpm in testing for a week or two to make sure I didn't miss any packages that needed to be rebuilt and because the rebuilt mc package will also have major changes/bug fixes.
Is there something where I can help out?
-Andy
-- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
On Tue, 17 Jun 2008, Eric Belanger wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jun 2008, Andreas Radke wrote:
We should try to clean up testing faster. I want to start the next big rebuild session for "db". Before that we should sort out what packages can be moved or deleted completely or what holds it back.
I asked dolby to make up lists for a testing repo cleanup that I wanted to do. I haven't heard from him yet. I guess he was just busy with the bugtracker. I was very busy as well. I posted a few comments below.
Here's the current ftp list for i686-testing:
1.7M Apr 4 23:00 exiv2-0.16-2-i686.pkg.tar.gz
That exiv2 has a soname bump. All packages that needed a rebuilt (haven't check the bug tracker) are in testing as well. They've been there for a couple of months. Neri: Can they be moved to extra?
742K Apr 8 02:35 openssh-5.0p1-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz
openssh-5.0p1-1 is already in core. this can be removed from testing.
118K May 4 18:31 sudo-1.6.9p15-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz
Paul and I forgot to start the signoff thread for it. It's now out-of-date.
52K May 23 20:37 mlocate-0.20-2-i686.pkg.tar.gz
has been signoffed. I asked for status in its signoff thread today.
mplayer-svn-25449-1
Tom: are you still maintaining it? This is a couple of month old. The current package in unstable is even older. IMO, it should be removed if it's not actively maintained anymore. A couple months old svn package is pointless.
BTW, I was working on a gpm soname bump. The x86_64 packages are ready and I was planning to move them in testing tonight with the i686 ones to follow later tonight or tomorrow. At least one of the rebuilt package for gpm also depends on db. We might not want to mix the 2 soname bump and do the db rebuild when the gpm one will be removed from testing. I was planning to keep the gpm in testing for a week or two to make sure I didn't miss any packages that needed to be rebuilt and because the rebuilt mc package will also have major changes/bug fixes.
Is there something where I can help out?
-Andy
Greg sent me his list. I cleanup some packages which were in both core and testing with the same version. I also moved dssi (it was part of the qt4 update) and k3b (old bugfix FS#9051) to extra. ##x86_64 #core packages man-pages 3.00-1 andyrtr sudo 1.6.9p15-1 already out of date #gpm rebuild aalib 1.4rc5-5 brltty 3.7.2-2 elinks 0.11.4rc1-3 fte 20051115-3 gstreamer0.10-good-plugins 0.10.8-3 gvim 7.1.315-1 jed 0.99.18-4 lde 2.6.1-3 links 2.1pre36-2 mc 4.6.1-5 vi 7.1.315-1 vim 7.1.315-1 xaos 3.3-2 xemacs 21.5.28-4 #exiv2 rebuild digikam 0.9.3-2 exiv2 0.16-2 gimp-ufraw 0.13-2 gwenview 1.4.2-2 kipi-plugins 0.1.5beta1-3 libkexiv2 0.1.6-3 #qt lyx 1.5.5-1 liborigin 20070926-1 already out of date libassuan 1.0.4-2 psi 0.12.svn1160-1 psi-i18n 0.12-1 qca 2.0.0.svn817733-1 qimageblitz 0.0.3.svn807093-1 qt 4.4.0-4 soprano 2.0.98-1 strigi 0.5.10-1 # archboot 2008.03-2 tpowa mkbootcd 2008.03-1 mkpxelinux 2008.03-1 tpowa mksyslinux 2008.03-1 cpufreqd 2.2.1-2 only in x86_64 testing motion 3.2.9-1 moving it to extra would fix FS#10652 #old packages eigen 1.0.5.svn744389-1 tpowa exim 4.68-4 already out of date hpoj 0.91-12 tpowa kismet 2007_10_R1-1 j.chu nasm 2.01-1 pkrakture pinentry 0.7.3-2 tpowa already out of date redland 1.0.7-1 tpowa #other dnsmasq 2.41-2 already out of date kdelibs 3.5.9-4 pierre ##i686 diff #old pkgs ivtv-utils 1.0.2-1 paul already out of date mplayer-svn 25449-1 #xorg xf86-video-apm-1.2.0-1 xf86-video-ark-0.7.0-1 xf86-video-ati-6.8.0-3 xf86-video-chips-1.2.0-1 xf86-video-savage-2.2.0-1 xf86-video-tdfx-1.4.0-1 xf86-video-trident-1.3.0-1 xf86-video-unichrome-0.2.6-7 xf86-video-via-0.2.2-4 qimageblitz 0.0.3.svn807093-1 !not in i686 only x86_64 ================================== -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
On Thu, 19 Jun 2008, Eric Belanger wrote:
mplayer-svn-25449-1
Tom: are you still maintaining it? This is a couple of month old. The current package in unstable is even older. IMO, it should be removed if it's not actively maintained anymore. A couple months old svn package is pointless.
status of mplayer-svn ?
#exiv2 rebuild digikam 0.9.3-2 exiv2 0.16-2 gimp-ufraw 0.13-2 gwenview 1.4.2-2 kipi-plugins 0.1.5beta1-3 libkexiv2 0.1.6-3
Any objection in moving the exiv2 stuff to extra? They've been in testing for nearly 3 months with no bug reports.
#qt lyx 1.5.5-1 liborigin 20070926-1 already out of date libassuan 1.0.4-2 psi 0.12.svn1160-1 psi-i18n 0.12-1 qca 2.0.0.svn817733-1 qimageblitz 0.0.3.svn807093-1 qt 4.4.0-4 soprano 2.0.98-1 strigi 0.5.10-1
Pierre: I believe you build these. Are they ready to be moved to extra?
motion 3.2.9-1 moving it to extra would fix FS#10652
Any objection in moving this to extra?
#old packages eigen 1.0.5.svn744389-1 tpowa exim 4.68-4 already out of date hpoj 0.91-12 tpowa kismet 2007_10_R1-1 j.chu nasm 2.01-1 pkrakture pinentry 0.7.3-2 tpowa already out of date redland 1.0.7-1 tpowa
#other dnsmasq 2.41-2 already out of date kdelibs 3.5.9-4 pierre
##i686 diff
#old pkgs ivtv-utils 1.0.2-1 paul already out of date
qimageblitz 0.0.3.svn807093-1 !not in i686 only x86_64
Is there any of these old packages that can be moved to extra? -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
2008/6/25 Eric Belanger <belanger@astro.umontreal.ca>:
On Thu, 19 Jun 2008, Eric Belanger wrote:
Is there any of these old packages that can be moved to extra?
I see no reason for nasm and dnsmasq to stay in testing. -- Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич)
#exiv2 rebuild digikam 0.9.3-2 exiv2 0.16-2 gimp-ufraw 0.13-2 gwenview 1.4.2-2 kipi-plugins 0.1.5beta1-3 libkexiv2 0.1.6-3
Any objection in moving the exiv2 stuff to extra? They've been in testing for nearly 3 months with no bug reports.
FYI, I've moved them to extra.
#qt lyx 1.5.5-1 liborigin 20070926-1 already out of date libassuan 1.0.4-2 psi 0.12.svn1160-1 psi-i18n 0.12-1 qca 2.0.0.svn817733-1 qimageblitz 0.0.3.svn807093-1 qt 4.4.0-4 soprano 2.0.98-1 strigi 0.5.10-1
Pierre: I believe you build these. Are they ready to be moved to extra?
Pierre said in the forums that there was some issues with lyx and qt. I guess they'll stay in testing for now. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
participants (3)
-
Andreas Radke
-
Eric Belanger
-
Roman Kyrylych