[arch-dev-public] [WARNING and signoff] klibc 1.5.14-1, klibc-extras 2.5-1, klibc-udev 128-1, klibc-kbd 1.15.20080312-7, klibc-module-init-tools 3.4-2, v86d 0.1.7-1
I updated klibc from 1.5 to the Testing 1.5.14. We had to patch 1.5 so heavily to even work and it had evil bugs, so going with 1.5.14 is better. First of all, it won't upgrade smoothly due to a pacman bug. Please do rm /usr/lib/klibc/include/asm to remove a symlink that causes lots of false file conflicts (http://archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2008-September/012971.html). After that you can update. If you want to test these, DO NOT OVERWRITE YOUR CURRENT INITRAMFS AND DO NOT WAIT FOR A KERNEL UPDATE TO DO SO. I only ran x86_64 on one machine, i686 is completely untested. Please do the following: mkinitcpio -k 2.6.26-ARCH -g /boot/kernel26.img.newklibc Then boot the kernel26.img.newklibc instead of kernel26.img (that can be done directly from grub). Here is the news: - Removed mknod from klibc-extras, using the klibc one instead - Update to klibc 1.5.14, fixing a memory corruption and probably more - Add resolve-modalias to klibc-extras - Update klibc-udev, it should now be in the same state as our udev package. Module blacklisting with disablemodules= or load_modules=off from the kernel commandline should now behave exactly like in the real system. - Updated v86d, I hope the segfault bug on i686 is now fixed due to the klibc update. Please test thoroughly and sign off.
Am Donnerstag 18 September 2008 18:48:08 schrieb Thomas Bächler:
Please test thoroughly and sign off.
works fine on i686 and x86_64 (but I don't use any special setup) -- Pierre Schmitz Clemens-August-Straße 76 53115 Bonn Telefon 0228 9716608 Mobil 0160 95269831 Jabber pierre@jabber.archlinux.de WWW http://www.archlinux.de
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 19:39:31 +0200 Pierre Schmitz <pierre@archlinux.de> wrote:
Am Donnerstag 18 September 2008 18:48:08 schrieb Thomas Bächler:
Please test thoroughly and sign off.
works fine on i686 and x86_64 (but I don't use any special setup)
Works here on x86_64. But same as Pierre, I don't use any special setup.
Am Donnerstag 18 September 2008 schrieb Daniel Isenmann:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 19:39:31 +0200
Pierre Schmitz <pierre@archlinux.de> wrote:
Am Donnerstag 18 September 2008 18:48:08 schrieb Thomas Bächler:
Please test thoroughly and sign off.
works fine on i686 and x86_64 (but I don't use any special setup)
Works here on x86_64. But same as Pierre, I don't use any special setup. works fine on raid 1 setup here signoff x86_64 greetings tpowa
-- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tpowa@archlinux.org
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
Am Donnerstag 18 September 2008 schrieb Daniel Isenmann:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 19:39:31 +0200
Pierre Schmitz <pierre@archlinux.de> wrote:
Am Donnerstag 18 September 2008 18:48:08 schrieb Thomas Bächler:
Please test thoroughly and sign off.
works fine on i686 and x86_64 (but I don't use any special setup)
Works here on x86_64. But same as Pierre, I don't use any special setup. works fine on raid 1 setup here signoff x86_64 greetings tpowa
signoffs: i686 - IDE x86_64 - SATA with RAID & LVM Eric -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 9:42 PM, Eric Belanger <belanger@astro.umontreal.ca> wrote:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
Am Donnerstag 18 September 2008 schrieb Daniel Isenmann:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 19:39:31 +0200
Pierre Schmitz <pierre@archlinux.de> wrote:
Am Donnerstag 18 September 2008 18:48:08 schrieb Thomas Bächler:
Please test thoroughly and sign off.
works fine on i686 and x86_64 (but I don't use any special setup)
Works here on x86_64. But same as Pierre, I don't use any special setup.
works fine on raid 1 setup here signoff x86_64 greetings tpowa
signoffs: i686 - IDE x86_64 - SATA with RAID & LVM
i686 with IDE setup is working fine. I even took the plunge and didn't create a backup initrd. :) Make sure we get a news item since this upgrade path is a bit funky due to the file conflicts. -Dan
Dan McGee wrote:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 9:42 PM, Eric Belanger <belanger@astro.umontreal.ca> wrote:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
Am Donnerstag 18 September 2008 schrieb Daniel Isenmann:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 19:39:31 +0200
Pierre Schmitz <pierre@archlinux.de> wrote:
Am Donnerstag 18 September 2008 18:48:08 schrieb Thomas Bächler:
Please test thoroughly and sign off.
works fine on i686 and x86_64 (but I don't use any special setup)
Works here on x86_64. But same as Pierre, I don't use any special setup.
works fine on raid 1 setup here signoff x86_64 greetings tpowa
signoffs: i686 - IDE x86_64 - SATA with RAID & LVM
i686 with IDE setup is working fine. I even took the plunge and didn't create a backup initrd. :)
Make sure we get a news item since this upgrade path is a bit funky due to the file conflicts.
Is this waiting on something to be moved from [testing]? Allan
participants (7)
-
Allan McRae
-
Dan McGee
-
Daniel Isenmann
-
Eric Belanger
-
Pierre Schmitz
-
Thomas Bächler
-
Tobias Powalowski