[arch-dev-public] Cleaning out [testing]
Now seems a good time to take a quick look at the packages in [testing] and see what we can clear out. It looks like we have libgl, haskell and texlive rebuilds sitting there at the moment as well as the usual packages awaiting signoffs. There are also a few packages that I am not too sure why they are in [testing] at the moment. If people could look at the "unknown" section below and move anything that does not really need to be in [testing] any longer. I have a suspicion some of those have been missed with other big package moves. Also, is there anything stopping the haskell and texlive builds moving to [extra]? [core] packages for signoff: ca-certificates, ca-certificates-java, run-parts cronie dcron libcap lzo2 make openssh pciutils rp-pppoe sudo syslinux usbutils vi unknown: archboot aufs2 blender bluez opencv php-apc python2-cairo python2-distribute python-distribute python-gdata libgl: ati-dri intel-dri libegl libgl libgles mach64-dri mesa mga-dri nouveau-dri r128-dri savage-dri sis-dri tdfx-dri unichrome-dri haskell: ghc haddock haskell-cgi haskell-deepseq haskell-fgl haskell-ghc-paths haskell-glut haskell-haskell-src haskell-html haskell-http haskell-hunit haskell-mtl haskell-network haskell-opengl haskell-parallel haskell-parsec haskell-platform haskell-quickcheck haskell-regex-base haskell-regex-compat haskell-regex-posix haskell-stm haskell-syb haskell-text haskell-transformers haskell-xhtml haskell-zlib texlive: texlive-bibtexextra texlive-bin texlive-core texlive-fontsextra texlive-formatsextra texlive-genericextra texlive-htmlxml texlive-humanities texlive-langcjk texlive-langcyrillic texlive-langextra texlive-langgreek texlive-latexextra texlive-music texlive-pictures texlive-plainextra texlive-pstricks texlive-publishers texlive-science
On Wed 04 May 2011 at 14:13 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
Now seems a good time to take a quick look at the packages in [testing] and see what we can clear out. It looks like we have libgl, haskell and texlive rebuilds sitting there at the moment as well as the usual packages awaiting signoffs. There are also a few packages that I am not too sure why they are in [testing] at the moment.
I moved texlive. I can check later if haskell is not broken (Vesa must have taken care of this one) and I think opencv should be moved quickly, as it has patched headers to be usable with g++ 4.6. -- Rémy.
On 04/05/11 15:22, Rémy Oudompheng wrote:
On Wed 04 May 2011 at 14:13 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
Now seems a good time to take a quick look at the packages in [testing] and see what we can clear out. It looks like we have libgl, haskell and texlive rebuilds sitting there at the moment as well as the usual packages awaiting signoffs. There are also a few packages that I am not too sure why they are in [testing] at the moment.
I moved texlive. I can check later if haskell is not broken (Vesa must have taken care of this one) and I think opencv should be moved quickly, as it has patched headers to be usable with g++ 4.6.
Ah... I remember the opencv rebuild for gcc-4.6. I have moved it. Allan
On 4 May 2011 14:29, Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org> wrote:
On 04/05/11 15:22, Rémy Oudompheng wrote:
On Wed 04 May 2011 at 14:13 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
Now seems a good time to take a quick look at the packages in [testing] and see what we can clear out. It looks like we have libgl, haskell and texlive rebuilds sitting there at the moment as well as the usual packages awaiting signoffs. There are also a few packages that I am not too sure why they are in [testing] at the moment.
I moved texlive. I can check later if haskell is not broken (Vesa must have taken care of this one) and I think opencv should be moved quickly, as it has patched headers to be usable with g++ 4.6.
Ah... I remember the opencv rebuild for gcc-4.6. I have moved it.
Thanks. I was actually waiting for this: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/23826 But it was about time..closed. -- GPG/PGP ID: 8AADBB10
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 12:13 AM, Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org> wrote:
Now seems a good time to take a quick look at the packages in [testing] and see what we can clear out. It looks like we have libgl, haskell and texlive rebuilds sitting there at the moment as well as the usual packages awaiting signoffs. There are also a few packages that I am not too sure why they are in [testing] at the moment.
If people could look at the "unknown" section below and move anything that does not really need to be in [testing] any longer. I have a suspicion some of those have been missed with other big package moves. Also, is there anything stopping the haskell and texlive builds moving to [extra]?
unknown: archboot aufs2 blender bluez opencv php-apc python2-cairo python2-distribute python-distribute python-gdata
I moved blender.
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 6:13 AM, Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org> wrote:
[core] packages for signoff: ca-certificates, ca-certificates-java, run-parts cronie dcron libcap lzo2 make
I could not find the signoff thread for make 3.82-3. It works here, so signoff x86_64. Cheers, Tom
On 05/04/2011 01:29 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 6:13 AM, Allan McRae<allan@archlinux.org> wrote:
[core] packages for signoff: ca-certificates, ca-certificates-java, run-parts cronie dcron libcap lzo2 make
I could not find the signoff thread for make 3.82-3. It works here, so signoff x86_64.
Cheers,
Tom
that's an oldie. is has a broken parallel building -- Ionuț
On Wed, 04 May 2011 13:33:36 +0300, Ionut Biru wrote:
On 05/04/2011 01:29 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 6:13 AM, Allan McRae<allan@archlinux.org> wrote:
[core] packages for signoff: ca-certificates, ca-certificates-java, run-parts cronie dcron libcap lzo2 make
I could not find the signoff thread for make 3.82-3. It works here, so signoff x86_64.
Cheers,
Tom
that's an oldie. is has a broken parallel building
Why do we keep it in testing if it's known to be broken? Waiting doesn't make it any better. ;-) -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
On 05/05/11 02:33, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
On Wed, 04 May 2011 13:33:36 +0300, Ionut Biru wrote:
On 05/04/2011 01:29 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 6:13 AM, Allan McRae<allan@archlinux.org> wrote:
[core] packages for signoff: ca-certificates, ca-certificates-java, run-parts cronie dcron libcap lzo2 make
I could not find the signoff thread for make 3.82-3. It works here, so signoff x86_64.
Cheers,
Tom
that's an oldie. is has a broken parallel building
Why do we keep it in testing if it's known to be broken? Waiting doesn't make it any better. ;-)
Mainly because there were also syntax changes with the latest make that it was good to get the fixes for into our packages. That and I am still not sure whether sometimes not parallel building should block it from moving to [core] so I might decide to move it some time... Allan
2011/5/4 Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>:
unknown: archboot aufs2 blender bluez opencv php-apc python2-cairo python2-distribute python-distribute python-gdata
* python2-cairo * python-gdata moved -- Angel Velásquez angvp @ irc.freenode.net Arch Linux Developer / Trusted User Linux Counter: #359909 http://www.angvp.com
participants (9)
-
Allan McRae
-
Eric Bélanger
-
Ionut Biru
-
Jan de Groot
-
Pierre Schmitz
-
Ray Rashif
-
Rémy Oudompheng
-
Tom Gundersen
-
Ángel Velásquez