[arch-dev-public] [signoff] procinfo-ng 2.0.304-1
This is a replacement for the procinfo package which is so old that it must be patched for the 2.6 kernel (and I am not sure where that patch originally came from...). I use the Debian strategy and pull the help scripts lsdev and socklist from the old procinfo package. Signoff both, Allan
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 09:31, Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org> wrote:
This is a replacement for the procinfo package which is so old that it must be patched for the 2.6 kernel (and I am not sure where that patch originally came from...).
I use the Debian strategy and pull the help scripts lsdev and socklist from the old procinfo package.
signoff x86_64 -- Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич)
On 04/19/2010 09:31 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
This is a replacement for the procinfo package which is so old that it must be patched for the 2.6 kernel (and I am not sure where that patch originally came from...).
I use the Debian strategy and pull the help scripts lsdev and socklist from the old procinfo package.
Signoff both, Allan
signoff x86_64 -- Ionut
On 24/04/10 19:05, Ionut Biru wrote:
On 04/19/2010 09:31 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
This is a replacement for the procinfo package which is so old that it must be patched for the 2.6 kernel (and I am not sure where that patch originally came from...).
I use the Debian strategy and pull the help scripts lsdev and socklist from the old procinfo package.
Signoff both, Allan
signoff x86_64
i686 anyone?
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org> wrote:
On 24/04/10 19:05, Ionut Biru wrote:
On 04/19/2010 09:31 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
This is a replacement for the procinfo package which is so old that it must be patched for the 2.6 kernel (and I am not sure where that patch originally came from...).
I use the Debian strategy and pull the help scripts lsdev and socklist from the old procinfo package.
Signoff both, Allan
signoff x86_64
i686 anyone?
Signoff i686
Am 19.04.2010 08:31, schrieb Allan McRae:
This is a replacement for the procinfo package which is so old that it must be patched for the 2.6 kernel (and I am not sure where that patch originally came from...).
I use the Debian strategy and pull the help scripts lsdev and socklist from the old procinfo package.
Signoff both, Allan
Just a funny fact: The package contains lsdev, procinfo and socklist. I never used any of those. Why is procinfo a standard package for a Linux system?
participants (5)
-
Allan McRae
-
Dan McGee
-
Ionut Biru
-
Roman Kyrylych
-
Thomas Bächler