[arch-dev-public] [signoff] jfsutils-1.1.15-1
New in 1.1.15 - 2011-03-04 * Several fixes for large filesystems where 64-bit variables are needed * Fix incorrect size check on directories * Make the timestamp format consisten Please signoff both arches, greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tpowa@archlinux.org
[2011-06-08 14:43:07 +0200] Tobias Powalowski:
New in 1.1.15 - 2011-03-04 * Several fixes for large filesystems where 64-bit variables are needed * Fix incorrect size check on directories * Make the timestamp format consisten
I note that it depends on glibc-2.14-1 from [testing]; with glibc-2.13-5 from [core] I get: jfs_logdump: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by jfs_logdump) Is it planned to move glibc to [core] before jfsutils? -- Gaetan
Am Mittwoch 08 Juni 2011 schrieb Gaetan Bisson:
[2011-06-08 14:43:07 +0200] Tobias Powalowski:
New in 1.1.15 - 2011-03-04 * Several fixes for large filesystems where 64-bit variables are needed * Fix incorrect size check on directories * Make the timestamp format consisten
I note that it depends on glibc-2.14-1 from [testing]; with glibc-2.13-5 from [core] I get:
jfs_logdump: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by jfs_logdump)
Is it planned to move glibc to [core] before jfsutils? Not really it can stay as long as needed in testing, i can't remember to get signoffs for jfs lately ;) greetings tpowa
-- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tpowa@archlinux.org
[2011-06-08 20:07:48 +0200] Tobias Powalowski:
Not really it can stay as long as needed in testing, i can't remember to get signoffs for jfs lately ;)
Well, I can signoff for x86_64 (and maybe give you one for i686 in a few days) but my point was that glibc has some issues so jfsutils will probably be out of [testing] before it. Cheers. -- Gaetan
Am Mittwoch 08 Juni 2011 schrieb Gaetan Bisson:
[2011-06-08 20:07:48 +0200] Tobias Powalowski:
Not really it can stay as long as needed in testing, i can't remember to get signoffs for jfs lately ;)
Well, I can signoff for x86_64 (and maybe give you one for i686 in a few days) but my point was that glibc has some issues so jfsutils will probably be out of [testing] before it.
Cheers. Hrm let's rebuild it against glibc 2.14 then.
-- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tpowa@archlinux.org
Am Mittwoch 08 Juni 2011 schrieb Gaetan Bisson:
[2011-06-08 20:07:48 +0200] Tobias Powalowski:
Not really it can stay as long as needed in testing, i can't remember to get signoffs for jfs lately ;)
Well, I can signoff for x86_64 (and maybe give you one for i686 in a few days) but my point was that glibc has some issues so jfsutils will probably be out of [testing] before it.
Cheers. ok rebuilt against old glibc, so please signoff -2 package :) greetings tpowa
-- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tpowa@archlinux.org
[2011-06-08 22:09:39 +0200] Tobias Powalowski:
ok rebuilt against old glibc, so please signoff -2 package :)
Thanks Tobias! Signoff both. -- Gaetan
participants (2)
-
Gaetan Bisson
-
Tobias Powalowski