[arch-dev-public] In what repo eventlog should be readded?
From Scott's email in the pacman-dev ML, I realized that the eventlog
Hi, package, a makedepends for syslog-ng, has been moved to unsupported by mistake. So it should be readded to the repo. I wonder if it should be readded in extra or placed in core instead? Eric -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
2007/11/5, Eric Belanger <belanger@astro.umontreal.ca>:
Hi,
From Scott's email in the pacman-dev ML, I realized that the eventlog package, a makedepends for syslog-ng, has been moved to unsupported by mistake. So it should be readded to the repo. I wonder if it should be readded in extra or placed in core instead?
IMO it should be fine in Extra. makedepends should not require placing them in Core, IMO. -- Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич)
On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 11:41:49AM +0200, Roman Kyrylych wrote:
2007/11/5, Eric Belanger <belanger@astro.umontreal.ca>:
Hi,
From Scott's email in the pacman-dev ML, I realized that the eventlog package, a makedepends for syslog-ng, has been moved to unsupported by mistake. So it should be readded to the repo. I wonder if it should be readded in extra or placed in core instead?
IMO it should be fine in Extra. makedepends should not require placing them in Core, IMO.
Assuming we still follow the rule that core should be totally independent of extra then a makedepend *does* have to go into core. It doesn't have to be in base or base-devel mind you. Jason
Am Mon, 5 Nov 2007 06:55:23 -0800 schrieb Jason Chu <jason@archlinux.org>:
On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 11:41:49AM +0200, Roman Kyrylych wrote:
2007/11/5, Eric Belanger <belanger@astro.umontreal.ca>:
Hi,
From Scott's email in the pacman-dev ML, I realized that the eventlog package, a makedepends for syslog-ng, has been moved to unsupported by mistake. So it should be readded to the repo. I wonder if it should be readded in extra or placed in core instead?
IMO it should be fine in Extra. makedepends should not require placing them in Core, IMO.
Assuming we still follow the rule that core should be totally independent of extra then a makedepend *does* have to go into core.
It doesn't have to be in base or base-devel mind you.
Jason
Glib2 is another makedepends of syslog-ng still sitting in extra. Just a reminder. For consistency we should tread them the same way. I vote for moving both of them to core. Andy
On 11/5/07, Andreas Radke <a.radke@arcor.de> wrote:
Am Mon, 5 Nov 2007 06:55:23 -0800 schrieb Jason Chu <jason@archlinux.org>:
On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 11:41:49AM +0200, Roman Kyrylych wrote:
2007/11/5, Eric Belanger <belanger@astro.umontreal.ca>:
Hi,
From Scott's email in the pacman-dev ML, I realized that the eventlog package, a makedepends for syslog-ng, has been moved to unsupported by mistake. So it should be readded to the repo. I wonder if it should be readded in extra or placed in core instead?
IMO it should be fine in Extra. makedepends should not require placing them in Core, IMO.
Assuming we still follow the rule that core should be totally independent of extra then a makedepend *does* have to go into core.
It doesn't have to be in base or base-devel mind you.
Jason
Glib2 is another makedepends of syslog-ng still sitting in extra. Just a reminder. For consistency we should tread them the same way. I vote for moving both of them to core.
I agree with Andy here. It's only two packages, and this way it keeps [core] independant (covering Jason's response too).
participants (5)
-
Aaron Griffin
-
Andreas Radke
-
Eric Belanger
-
Jason Chu
-
Roman Kyrylych