[arch-dev-public] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.28.7-2
Hi guys, new kernel adresses the following things: - changes for better customizing the default kernel included http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/12384 --> firmware needed to be split off the package. It is now called kernel26-firmware - config features added: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/13128 http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/12584 bug fixes: - http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/12826 please signoff for both arches. I haven't had issues with nvidia driver here, but please report issues if binary modules break, thanks. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tpowa@archlinux.org
Tobias Powalowski schrieb:
Hi guys, new kernel adresses the following things: - changes for better customizing the default kernel included http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/12384 --> firmware needed to be split off the package. It is now called kernel26-firmware - config features added: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/13128 http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/12584
bug fixes: - http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/12826
Signoff x86_64 (no external modules used).
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 7:07 PM, Thomas Bächler <thomas@archlinux.org> wrote:
Tobias Powalowski schrieb:
Hi guys, new kernel adresses the following things: - changes for better customizing the default kernel included http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/12384 --> firmware needed to be split off the package. It is now called kernel26-firmware - config features added: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/13128 http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/12584
bug fixes: - http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/12826
Signoff x86_64 (no external modules used).
Working here on x86_64. -Dan
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 8:13 PM, Dan McGee <dpmcgee@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 7:07 PM, Thomas Bächler <thomas@archlinux.org> wrote:
Tobias Powalowski schrieb:
Hi guys, new kernel adresses the following things: - changes for better customizing the default kernel included http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/12384 --> firmware needed to be split off the package. It is now called kernel26-firmware - config features added: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/13128 http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/12584
bug fixes: - http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/12826
Signoff x86_64 (no external modules used).
Working here on x86_64.
-Dan
Signoff both arches Eric
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 7:07 PM, Thomas Bächler <thomas@archlinux.org> wrote:
Tobias Powalowski schrieb:
Hi guys, new kernel adresses the following things: - changes for better customizing the default kernel included http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/12384 --> firmware needed to be split off the package. It is now called kernel26-firmware - config features added: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/13128 http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/12584
bug fixes: - http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/12826
Signoff x86_64 (no external modules used).
I'm not sure what package this is related to, but has this always been failing for me and I just haven't noticed? It is doing this on both of my machines. Mar 8 19:51:43 dublin kernel: platform microcode: firmware: requesting intel-ucode/0f-02-09 Mar 8 19:51:43 dublin load-modules.sh: 'platform:microcode' is not a valid module or alias name Mar 8 19:51:43 dublin kernel: Microcode Update Driver: v2.00 <tigran@aivazian.fsnet.co.uk>, Peter Oruba Mar 8 19:51:43 dublin firmware.sh[3359]: Cannot find firmware file 'intel-ucode/0f-02-09' Mar 8 19:51:44 dublin kernel: microcode: CPU0 updated from revision 0xe to 0x2e, date = 2004-08-11 Mar 8 19:51:44 dublin kernel: Microcode Update Driver: v2.00 removed. -Dan
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 8:01 PM, Dan McGee <dpmcgee@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 7:07 PM, Thomas Bächler <thomas@archlinux.org> wrote:
Tobias Powalowski schrieb:
Hi guys, new kernel adresses the following things: - changes for better customizing the default kernel included http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/12384 --> firmware needed to be split off the package. It is now called kernel26-firmware - config features added: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/13128 http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/12584
bug fixes: - http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/12826
Signoff x86_64 (no external modules used).
I'm not sure what package this is related to, but has this always been failing for me and I just haven't noticed? It is doing this on both of my machines.
Mar 8 19:51:43 dublin kernel: platform microcode: firmware: requesting intel-ucode/0f-02-09 Mar 8 19:51:43 dublin load-modules.sh: 'platform:microcode' is not a valid module or alias name Mar 8 19:51:43 dublin kernel: Microcode Update Driver: v2.00 <tigran@aivazian.fsnet.co.uk>, Peter Oruba Mar 8 19:51:43 dublin firmware.sh[3359]: Cannot find firmware file 'intel-ucode/0f-02-09' Mar 8 19:51:44 dublin kernel: microcode: CPU0 updated from revision 0xe to 0x2e, date = 2004-08-11 Mar 8 19:51:44 dublin kernel: Microcode Update Driver: v2.00 removed.
Looks like it really isn't a problem, just a deceiving error message... http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/11961
Dan McGee schrieb:
I'm not sure what package this is related to, but has this always been failing for me and I just haven't noticed? It is doing this on both of my machines.
Mar 8 19:51:43 dublin kernel: platform microcode: firmware: requesting intel-ucode/0f-02-09 Mar 8 19:51:43 dublin load-modules.sh: 'platform:microcode' is not a valid module or alias name Mar 8 19:51:43 dublin kernel: Microcode Update Driver: v2.00 <tigran@aivazian.fsnet.co.uk>, Peter Oruba Mar 8 19:51:43 dublin firmware.sh[3359]: Cannot find firmware file 'intel-ucode/0f-02-09' Mar 8 19:51:44 dublin kernel: microcode: CPU0 updated from revision 0xe to 0x2e, date = 2004-08-11 Mar 8 19:51:44 dublin kernel: Microcode Update Driver: v2.00 removed.
Looks like it really isn't a problem, just a deceiving error message... http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/11961
Yeah, and annoying, I wish that splitting tool would exist, this message also annoys me.
participants (4)
-
Dan McGee
-
Eric Bélanger
-
Thomas Bächler
-
Tobias Powalowski