Roman Kyrylych wrote:

2007/11/30, Varun Acharya :

...

Hi Devs/TU's,

Why do we still have the renaming of packages in community so that packages are uploaded without the '-arch' in the filename? Official repo's were converted a while back, any reason were not editing communitypkg to do the same?

I don't know if AUR backend is able to handle packages with -arch suffix. I asked Paul about this quite some time ago, but didn't recieve a reply AFAIR. Simo, can you take a look at this?

Sorry, thought I replied to this. It doesn't handle the -arch suffix. - P

On Nov 30, 2007 8:11 AM, Paul Mattal wrote:

Roman Kyrylych wrote:

...

2007/11/30, Varun Acharya :

...

Hi Devs/TU's,

Why do we still have the renaming of packages in community so that packages are uploaded without the '-arch' in the filename? Official repo's were converted a while back, any reason were not editing communitypkg to do the same?

I don't know if AUR backend is able to handle packages with -arch suffix. I asked Paul about this quite some time ago, but didn't recieve a reply AFAIR. Simo, can you take a look at this?

Sorry, thought I replied to this.

It doesn't handle the -arch suffix.

I would encourage the one who fixes this issue to make things completely filename agnostic if possible. Note the %FILENAME% field in the pacman sync DB entries now. In addition, the .PKGINFO file in the package is quite easy to parse. -Dan