[arch-dev-public] [signoff] iptables 1.4.3-1
In testing for both architectures. Please signoff. Ronald
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 11:04 PM, Ronald van Haren <pressh@gmail.com> wrote:
In testing for both architectures. Please signoff.
Ronald
Bumped to 1.4.3.1-1, so please signoff that one. Upstream changes wrt 1.4.3: iptables-save: minor corrections to the manpage markup libxt_hashlimit: add missing space for iptables-save output iptables: refer to dmesg if we hit EINVAL libxtables: fix compile error due to incomplete change build: fix linker issue when LDFLAGS contains --as-needed Ronald
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 4:38 AM, Ronald van Haren <pressh@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 11:04 PM, Ronald van Haren <pressh@gmail.com> wrote:
In testing for both architectures. Please signoff.
Ronald
Bumped to 1.4.3.1-1, so please signoff that one.
Upstream changes wrt 1.4.3: iptables-save: minor corrections to the manpage markup libxt_hashlimit: add missing space for iptables-save output iptables: refer to dmesg if we hit EINVAL libxtables: fix compile error due to incomplete change build: fix linker issue when LDFLAGS contains --as-needed
Ronald
signoff x86_64 Eric
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 6:24 AM, Eric Bélanger <snowmaniscool@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 4:38 AM, Ronald van Haren <pressh@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 11:04 PM, Ronald van Haren <pressh@gmail.com> wrote:
In testing for both architectures. Please signoff.
Ronald
Bumped to 1.4.3.1-1, so please signoff that one.
Upstream changes wrt 1.4.3: iptables-save: minor corrections to the manpage markup libxt_hashlimit: add missing space for iptables-save output iptables: refer to dmesg if we hit EINVAL libxtables: fix compile error due to incomplete change build: fix linker issue when LDFLAGS contains --as-needed
Ronald
signoff x86_64
Eric
I know we were going to phase the 32 bit architecture out, but I'd still like to move it to core sometime in the near future :) Anyone who can signoff for i686? Ronald
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Ronald van Haren <pressh@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 6:24 AM, Eric Bélanger <snowmaniscool@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 4:38 AM, Ronald van Haren <pressh@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 11:04 PM, Ronald van Haren <pressh@gmail.com> wrote:
In testing for both architectures. Please signoff.
Ronald
Bumped to 1.4.3.1-1, so please signoff that one.
Upstream changes wrt 1.4.3: iptables-save: minor corrections to the manpage markup libxt_hashlimit: add missing space for iptables-save output iptables: refer to dmesg if we hit EINVAL libxtables: fix compile error due to incomplete change build: fix linker issue when LDFLAGS contains --as-needed
Ronald
signoff x86_64
Eric
I know we were going to phase the 32 bit architecture out, but I'd still like to move it to core sometime in the near future :) Anyone who can signoff for i686?
Ronald
FYI, 1.4.3.2 is out.
On 4/6/09, Eric Bélanger <snowmaniscool@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Ronald van Haren <pressh@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 6:24 AM, Eric Bélanger <snowmaniscool@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 4:38 AM, Ronald van Haren <pressh@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 11:04 PM, Ronald van Haren <pressh@gmail.com> wrote:
In testing for both architectures. Please signoff.
Ronald
Bumped to 1.4.3.1-1, so please signoff that one.
Upstream changes wrt 1.4.3: iptables-save: minor corrections to the manpage markup libxt_hashlimit: add missing space for iptables-save output iptables: refer to dmesg if we hit EINVAL libxtables: fix compile error due to incomplete change build: fix linker issue when LDFLAGS contains --as-needed
Ronald
signoff x86_64
Eric
I know we were going to phase the 32 bit architecture out, but I'd still like to move it to core sometime in the near future :) Anyone who can signoff for i686?
Ronald
FYI, 1.4.3.2 is out.
I'd like to move 1.4.3.1 tomorrow into core so I can get to 1.4.3.2. Please someone signoff for i686, or can I have an auto signoff Aaron? Ronald
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 5:20 PM, Ronald van Haren <pressh@gmail.com> wrote:
On 4/6/09, Eric Bélanger <snowmaniscool@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Ronald van Haren <pressh@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 6:24 AM, Eric Bélanger <snowmaniscool@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 4:38 AM, Ronald van Haren <pressh@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 11:04 PM, Ronald van Haren <pressh@gmail.com> wrote:
In testing for both architectures. Please signoff.
Ronald
Bumped to 1.4.3.1-1, so please signoff that one.
Upstream changes wrt 1.4.3: iptables-save: minor corrections to the manpage markup libxt_hashlimit: add missing space for iptables-save output iptables: refer to dmesg if we hit EINVAL libxtables: fix compile error due to incomplete change build: fix linker issue when LDFLAGS contains --as-needed
Ronald
signoff x86_64
Eric
I know we were going to phase the 32 bit architecture out, but I'd still like to move it to core sometime in the near future :) Anyone who can signoff for i686?
Ronald
FYI, 1.4.3.2 is out.
I'd like to move 1.4.3.1 tomorrow into core so I can get to 1.4.3.2. Please someone signoff for i686, or can I have an auto signoff Aaron?
Ronald
I would say go ahead and move it to core. It has been in testing for nearly 2 weeks; if there's no bug report, it's fine. I checked it and it seems OK. Signoff i686. Eric
participants (2)
-
Eric Bélanger
-
Ronald van Haren