Wow, you sunk a lot of time into this. :)

Thanks for your kind words. Anything to help Arch be a better Distro.

On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 6:31 AM, Jud <jud at judfilm.net> wrote:

...

Hi Devs,

I have been looking at the Arch [core] packages and have noticed some issues, could you please take at look and where possible rectify them as soon as possible? Thank-you. <Arch Linux>

...

Dan McGee dash Update Description?: A POSIX-compliant shell that aims to be as small as possible without sacrificing speed

The upstream description from the website is basically what I have now (http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/dash/), so I'm actually going to leave it.

ok.

A lot of these suggestions look great, but we don't need to pedantic here with our exact casing in case people can't figure out the often-stupid naming schemes of their favorite programs. Another thing to keep in mind- any description that includes the name of the package or starts with "<packagename> is..." is too verbose. Keeping descriptions to one line is also ideal as it keeps -Ss output clean.

ok, thanks for the tips. I'll have another look over them.