[arch-dev-public] [draft] New item for kernel version requirement increase
Very simple news announcement. Any comments? --Start Draft-- Minimum required kernel version increased With the glibc-2.10 toolchain update, the minimum kernel version requirement for glibc has been increased from 2.6.16 to 2.6.18. For help fixing issues porting software to build with glibc-2.10 and gcc-4.4, see [1] and [2] respectively. [1] http://udrepper.livejournal.com/20948.html [2] http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.4/porting_to.html --End Draft--
Am Sun, 24 May 2009 15:35:26 +1000 schrieb Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>:
Very simple news announcement. Any comments?
--Start Draft--
Minimum required kernel version increased
With the glibc-2.10 toolchain update, the minimum kernel version requirement for glibc has been increased from 2.6.16 to 2.6.18.
For help fixing issues porting software to build with glibc-2.10 and gcc-4.4, see [1] and [2] respectively.
[1] http://udrepper.livejournal.com/20948.html [2] http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.4/porting_to.html
--End Draft--
Fine to me. Move it in. -Andy
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 2:04 AM, Andreas Radke <a.radke@arcor.de> wrote:
Am Sun, 24 May 2009 15:35:26 +1000 schrieb Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>:
Very simple news announcement. Any comments?
--Start Draft--
Minimum required kernel version increased
With the glibc-2.10 toolchain update, the minimum kernel version requirement for glibc has been increased from 2.6.16 to 2.6.18.
For help fixing issues porting software to build with glibc-2.10 and gcc-4.4, see [1] and [2] respectively.
[1] http://udrepper.livejournal.com/20948.html [2] http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.4/porting_to.html
--End Draft--
Fine to me. Move it in.
Obviously I'm late on the response, but looks fine. As an FYI, you can do real links by putting things in <a/> tags. I edited it to do so. Of course, if you looked here (https://dev.archlinux.org/news/447/), you wouldn't think so, but this (http://www.archlinux.org/news/447/) will work. -Dan
2009/5/24 Dan McGee <dpmcgee@gmail.com>:
Of course, if you looked here (https://dev.archlinux.org/news/447/), you wouldn't think so, but this (http://www.archlinux.org/news/447/) will work.
Somebody must have fixed it in one project and not in the other. Who would do such a thing!? Dusty
2009/5/24 Dusty Phillips <buchuki@gmail.com>:
2009/5/24 Dan McGee <dpmcgee@gmail.com>:
Of course, if you looked here (https://dev.archlinux.org/news/447/), you wouldn't think so, but this (http://www.archlinux.org/news/447/) will work.
Somebody must have fixed it in one project and not in the other. Who would do such a thing!?
Dusty
What I meant to say was, they look the same to me... Dusty
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Dusty Phillips <buchuki@gmail.com> wrote:
2009/5/24 Dusty Phillips <buchuki@gmail.com>:
2009/5/24 Dan McGee <dpmcgee@gmail.com>:
Of course, if you looked here (https://dev.archlinux.org/news/447/), you wouldn't think so, but this (http://www.archlinux.org/news/447/) will work.
Somebody must have fixed it in one project and not in the other. Who would do such a thing!?
Dusty
What I meant to say was, they look the same to me...
Dusty
Yes, exactly the same cough http://projects.archlinux.org/?p=archweb_dev.git;a=commitdiff;h=95f999b2646d... cough... :) -Dan
[ 2009/5/24 Dan McGee <dpmcgee@gmail.com>:
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Dusty Phillips <buchuki@gmail.com> wrote:
2009/5/24 Dusty Phillips <buchuki@gmail.com>:
2009/5/24 Dan McGee <dpmcgee@gmail.com>:
Of course, if you looked here (https://dev.archlinux.org/news/447/), you wouldn't think so, but this (http://www.archlinux.org/news/447/) will work.
Somebody must have fixed it in one project and not in the other. Who would do such a thing!?
Dusty
What I meant to say was, they look the same to me...
Dusty
Yes, exactly the same cough http://projects.archlinux.org/?p=archweb_dev.git;a=commitdiff;h=95f999b2646d... cough...
:)
I know, I copy pasted the change. :-P Dusty
participants (4)
-
Allan McRae
-
Andreas Radke
-
Dan McGee
-
Dusty Phillips