Hello! This is not really related to a 'real job' (sorry!) but it's quite interesting since it represents Arch on a quite large FOSS-related site, and it is actually an interesting source of statistics. As someone of you may know - there are Arch Linux related projects registered on Ohloh: * Arch Linux - most git repositories from projects.archlinux.org * Arch Linux Packages - our SVN and community CVS (we should add community SVN when it's ready, but make sure old CVS history is retained) * AUR - aur.git * Arch Linux Installer - installer.git (but not aif.git) * Pacman - pacman.git Is this structure OK or does someone have a suggestions for changes? For example, would it be better to move aif.git to Arch Linux Installer or merge installer.git into Arch Linux? (IMO 2nd way i's better). They also have Managers feature now, so it would be nice if Aaron (they suggest that it should be "Someone who works on the project. Ideally the owner, founder, lead developer, or release manager.") took management of all our projects and modified permissions to protect from vandalism. -- Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич)
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 02:47, Roman Kyrylych<roman.kyrylych@gmail.com> wrote:
* Arch Linux Packages - our SVN and community CVS (we should add community SVN when it's ready, but make sure old CVS history is retained)
actually, this project is not updated for more than a year (since we moved SVN & CVS to repos.archlinux.org, I guess) so it needs fixing. -- Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич)
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 6:47 PM, Roman Kyrylych<roman.kyrylych@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello!
This is not really related to a 'real job' (sorry!) but it's quite interesting since it represents Arch on a quite large FOSS-related site, and it is actually an interesting source of statistics.
As someone of you may know - there are Arch Linux related projects registered on Ohloh: * Arch Linux - most git repositories from projects.archlinux.org * Arch Linux Packages - our SVN and community CVS (we should add community SVN when it's ready, but make sure old CVS history is retained) * AUR - aur.git * Arch Linux Installer - installer.git (but not aif.git) * Pacman - pacman.git
Is this structure OK or does someone have a suggestions for changes? For example, would it be better to move aif.git to Arch Linux Installer or merge installer.git into Arch Linux? (IMO 2nd way i's better).
They also have Managers feature now, so it would be nice if Aaron (they suggest that it should be "Someone who works on the project. Ideally the owner, founder, lead developer, or release manager.") took management of all our projects and modified permissions to protect from vandalism.
I'd say you are welcome to take the lead on this and do what you think needs to be done. -Dan
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 02:41, Dan McGee<dpmcgee@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 6:47 PM, Roman Kyrylych<roman.kyrylych@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello!
This is not really related to a 'real job' (sorry!) but it's quite interesting since it represents Arch on a quite large FOSS-related site, and it is actually an interesting source of statistics.
As someone of you may know - there are Arch Linux related projects registered on Ohloh: * Arch Linux - most git repositories from projects.archlinux.org * Arch Linux Packages - our SVN and community CVS (we should add community SVN when it's ready, but make sure old CVS history is retained) * AUR - aur.git * Arch Linux Installer - installer.git (but not aif.git) * Pacman - pacman.git
Is this structure OK or does someone have a suggestions for changes? For example, would it be better to move aif.git to Arch Linux Installer or merge installer.git into Arch Linux? (IMO 2nd way i's better).
They also have Managers feature now, so it would be nice if Aaron (they suggest that it should be "Someone who works on the project. Ideally the owner, founder, lead developer, or release manager.") took management of all our projects and modified permissions to protect from vandalism.
I'd say you are welcome to take the lead on this and do what you think needs to be done.
Okay. Corrected the URL to our SVN. Will see how it will update statistics. More changes will follow later. -- Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич)
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 23:14, Roman Kyrylych<roman.kyrylych@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 02:41, Dan McGee<dpmcgee@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 6:47 PM, Roman Kyrylych<roman.kyrylych@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello!
This is not really related to a 'real job' (sorry!) but it's quite interesting since it represents Arch on a quite large FOSS-related site, and it is actually an interesting source of statistics.
As someone of you may know - there are Arch Linux related projects registered on Ohloh: * Arch Linux - most git repositories from projects.archlinux.org * Arch Linux Packages - our SVN and community CVS (we should add community SVN when it's ready, but make sure old CVS history is retained) * AUR - aur.git * Arch Linux Installer - installer.git (but not aif.git) * Pacman - pacman.git
Is this structure OK or does someone have a suggestions for changes? For example, would it be better to move aif.git to Arch Linux Installer or merge installer.git into Arch Linux? (IMO 2nd way i's better).
They also have Managers feature now, so it would be nice if Aaron (they suggest that it should be "Someone who works on the project. Ideally the owner, founder, lead developer, or release manager.") took management of all our projects and modified permissions to protect from vandalism.
I'd say you are welcome to take the lead on this and do what you think needs to be done.
Okay. Corrected the URL to our SVN. Will see how it will update statistics. More changes will follow later.
It took lots of time during which a couple of bugs in Ohloh were uncovered, but thanks to the great support from Ohloh team our huge repo is now imported. You can browse some stats at https://www.ohloh.net/p/4510/analyses/latest It's fun that Ohloh thinks we have quite alot of D source code - this is due to foobar.conf.d files bundled with some packages. Note that all our current/core/extra/unstable CVS repos history is missing after SVN was finally imported. I'm not sure about CVS/SVN URLs for our old repos, could someone please provide me with the following info: * CVS URL to our old current/core/extra/unstable CVS repos * same for community CVS repo currently it is ":pserver:anonymous:anonymous@cvs.archlinux.org:/srv/cvs/cvs-community community" - is it correct? (Ohloh could not update from that URL for a long time) * SVN URL to the new community SVN repo -- Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич)
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 9:00 AM, Roman Kyrylych<roman.kyrylych@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 23:14, Roman Kyrylych<roman.kyrylych@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 02:41, Dan McGee<dpmcgee@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 6:47 PM, Roman Kyrylych<roman.kyrylych@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello!
This is not really related to a 'real job' (sorry!) but it's quite interesting since it represents Arch on a quite large FOSS-related site, and it is actually an interesting source of statistics.
As someone of you may know - there are Arch Linux related projects registered on Ohloh: * Arch Linux - most git repositories from projects.archlinux.org * Arch Linux Packages - our SVN and community CVS (we should add community SVN when it's ready, but make sure old CVS history is retained) * AUR - aur.git * Arch Linux Installer - installer.git (but not aif.git) * Pacman - pacman.git
Is this structure OK or does someone have a suggestions for changes? For example, would it be better to move aif.git to Arch Linux Installer or merge installer.git into Arch Linux? (IMO 2nd way i's better).
They also have Managers feature now, so it would be nice if Aaron (they suggest that it should be "Someone who works on the project. Ideally the owner, founder, lead developer, or release manager.") took management of all our projects and modified permissions to protect from vandalism.
I'd say you are welcome to take the lead on this and do what you think needs to be done.
Okay. Corrected the URL to our SVN. Will see how it will update statistics. More changes will follow later.
It took lots of time during which a couple of bugs in Ohloh were uncovered, but thanks to the great support from Ohloh team our huge repo is now imported.
You can browse some stats at https://www.ohloh.net/p/4510/analyses/latest
It's fun that Ohloh thinks we have quite alot of D source code - this is due to foobar.conf.d files bundled with some packages.
Nice. Pierre's and Allan's primary language is D!
Note that all our current/core/extra/unstable CVS repos history is missing after SVN was finally imported.
I'm not sure about CVS/SVN URLs for our old repos, could someone please provide me with the following info: * CVS URL to our old current/core/extra/unstable CVS repos
Hmm we don't have cvs pserver running anymore. Can we authenticate over ssh safely? If so, they're all located in /srv/cvs on gerolde
- is it correct? (Ohloh could not update from that URL for a long time) * SVN URL to the new community SVN repo
svn+ssh://aur.archlinux.org/srv/svn-packages - same as gerolde, just different hostname
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 18:35, Aaron Griffin<aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 9:00 AM, Roman Kyrylych<roman.kyrylych@gmail.com> wrote:
Note that all our current/core/extra/unstable CVS repos history is missing after SVN was finally imported.
I'm not sure about CVS/SVN URLs for our old repos, could someone please provide me with the following info: * CVS URL to our old current/core/extra/unstable CVS repos
Hmm we don't have cvs pserver running anymore. Can we authenticate over ssh safely? If so, they're all located in /srv/cvs on gerolde
I don't think Ohloh supports ssh, at least svn+ssh:// is not recognized as valid.
- is it correct? (Ohloh could not update from that URL for a long time) * SVN URL to the new community SVN repo
svn+ssh://aur.archlinux.org/srv/svn-packages - same as gerolde, just different hostname
As mentioned above, svn+ssh:// is rejected, svn://aur.archlinux.org/srv/svn-packages does not work either ("An error occured connecting to the server. Check the URL, username, and password") -- Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич)
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 12:43 PM, Roman Kyrylych<roman.kyrylych@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 18:35, Aaron Griffin<aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 9:00 AM, Roman Kyrylych<roman.kyrylych@gmail.com> wrote:
Note that all our current/core/extra/unstable CVS repos history is missing after SVN was finally imported.
I'm not sure about CVS/SVN URLs for our old repos, could someone please provide me with the following info: * CVS URL to our old current/core/extra/unstable CVS repos
Hmm we don't have cvs pserver running anymore. Can we authenticate over ssh safely? If so, they're all located in /srv/cvs on gerolde
I don't think Ohloh supports ssh, at least svn+ssh:// is not recognized as valid.
- is it correct? (Ohloh could not update from that URL for a long time) * SVN URL to the new community SVN repo
svn+ssh://aur.archlinux.org/srv/svn-packages - same as gerolde, just different hostname
As mentioned above, svn+ssh:// is rejected, svn://aur.archlinux.org/srv/svn-packages does not work either ("An error occured connecting to the server. Check the URL, username, and password")
Yeah, svn:// need svnserve running. I guess I could set it up on there...
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Aaron Griffin<aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 12:43 PM, Roman Kyrylych<roman.kyrylych@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 18:35, Aaron Griffin<aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 9:00 AM, Roman Kyrylych<roman.kyrylych@gmail.com> wrote:
Note that all our current/core/extra/unstable CVS repos history is missing after SVN was finally imported.
I'm not sure about CVS/SVN URLs for our old repos, could someone please provide me with the following info: * CVS URL to our old current/core/extra/unstable CVS repos
Hmm we don't have cvs pserver running anymore. Can we authenticate over ssh safely? If so, they're all located in /srv/cvs on gerolde
I don't think Ohloh supports ssh, at least svn+ssh:// is not recognized as valid.
- is it correct? (Ohloh could not update from that URL for a long time) * SVN URL to the new community SVN repo
svn+ssh://aur.archlinux.org/srv/svn-packages - same as gerolde, just different hostname
As mentioned above, svn+ssh:// is rejected, svn://aur.archlinux.org/srv/svn-packages does not work either ("An error occured connecting to the server. Check the URL, username, and password")
Yeah, svn:// need svnserve running. I guess I could set it up on there...
Success. $ svn co -N svn://aur.archlinux.org/srv/svn-packages Checked out revision 81.
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 22:20, Aaron Griffin<aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Aaron Griffin<aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 12:43 PM, Roman Kyrylych<roman.kyrylych@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 18:35, Aaron Griffin<aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 9:00 AM, Roman Kyrylych<roman.kyrylych@gmail.com> wrote:
Note that all our current/core/extra/unstable CVS repos history is missing after SVN was finally imported.
I'm not sure about CVS/SVN URLs for our old repos, could someone please provide me with the following info: * CVS URL to our old current/core/extra/unstable CVS repos
Hmm we don't have cvs pserver running anymore. Can we authenticate over ssh safely? If so, they're all located in /srv/cvs on gerolde
I don't think Ohloh supports ssh, at least svn+ssh:// is not recognized as valid.
- is it correct? (Ohloh could not update from that URL for a long time) * SVN URL to the new community SVN repo
svn+ssh://aur.archlinux.org/srv/svn-packages - same as gerolde, just different hostname
As mentioned above, svn+ssh:// is rejected, svn://aur.archlinux.org/srv/svn-packages does not work either ("An error occured connecting to the server. Check the URL, username, and password")
Yeah, svn:// need svnserve running. I guess I could set it up on there...
Success.
$ svn co -N svn://aur.archlinux.org/srv/svn-packages Checked out revision 81.
Okay, SVN repos are tracked now. Is there a way of getting pserver CVS URLs working? They can be enabled only for syncing and then disabled forever. -- Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич)
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 3:16 AM, Roman Kyrylych<roman.kyrylych@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 22:20, Aaron Griffin<aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Aaron Griffin<aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 12:43 PM, Roman Kyrylych<roman.kyrylych@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 18:35, Aaron Griffin<aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 9:00 AM, Roman Kyrylych<roman.kyrylych@gmail.com> wrote:
Note that all our current/core/extra/unstable CVS repos history is missing after SVN was finally imported.
I'm not sure about CVS/SVN URLs for our old repos, could someone please provide me with the following info: * CVS URL to our old current/core/extra/unstable CVS repos
Hmm we don't have cvs pserver running anymore. Can we authenticate over ssh safely? If so, they're all located in /srv/cvs on gerolde
I don't think Ohloh supports ssh, at least svn+ssh:// is not recognized as valid.
- is it correct? (Ohloh could not update from that URL for a long time) * SVN URL to the new community SVN repo
svn+ssh://aur.archlinux.org/srv/svn-packages - same as gerolde, just different hostname
As mentioned above, svn+ssh:// is rejected, svn://aur.archlinux.org/srv/svn-packages does not work either ("An error occured connecting to the server. Check the URL, username, and password")
Yeah, svn:// need svnserve running. I guess I could set it up on there...
Success.
$ svn co -N svn://aur.archlinux.org/srv/svn-packages Checked out revision 81.
Okay, SVN repos are tracked now. Is there a way of getting pserver CVS URLs working? They can be enabled only for syncing and then disabled forever.
Ummm I could turn on the pserver, I guess, but i don't even know if it's configured right anymore... anyone else with sudo rights want to do this?
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 23:14, Roman Kyrylych<roman.kyrylych@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 02:41, Dan McGee<dpmcgee@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 6:47 PM, Roman Kyrylych<roman.kyrylych@gmail.com> wrote:
I'd say you are welcome to take the lead on this and do what you think needs to be done.
Okay. Corrected the URL to our SVN. Will see how it will update statistics. More changes will follow later.
FYI, old Arch Linux Installer project deleted, the git repo is now enlisted as part of Arch Linux project. I've also added a couple of missing git repos from projects.archlinux.org I'm unlisting the CVS repo for community from Arch Linux Packages because it blocks SVN repos to be synced. Whenever CVS server will be up and running - let me know so I can add it. -- Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич)
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 11:08:37 +0300 Roman Kyrylych <roman.kyrylych@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 23:14, Roman Kyrylych<roman.kyrylych@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 02:41, Dan McGee<dpmcgee@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 6:47 PM, Roman Kyrylych<roman.kyrylych@gmail.com> wrote:
I'd say you are welcome to take the lead on this and do what you think needs to be done.
Okay. Corrected the URL to our SVN. Will see how it will update statistics. More changes will follow later.
FYI, old Arch Linux Installer project deleted, the git repo is now enlisted as part of Arch Linux project. I've also added a couple of missing git repos from projects.archlinux.org
I'm unlisting the CVS repo for community from Arch Linux Packages because it blocks SVN repos to be synced.
Whenever CVS server will be up and running - let me know so I can add it.
Hmm http://www.ohloh.net/p/arch-linux/contributors is odd. Something doesn't seem right there. Dieter
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 11:16, Dieter Plaetinck<dieter@plaetinck.be> wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 11:08:37 +0300 Roman Kyrylych <roman.kyrylych@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 23:14, Roman Kyrylych<roman.kyrylych@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 02:41, Dan McGee<dpmcgee@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 6:47 PM, Roman Kyrylych<roman.kyrylych@gmail.com> wrote:
I'd say you are welcome to take the lead on this and do what you think needs to be done.
Okay. Corrected the URL to our SVN. Will see how it will update statistics. More changes will follow later.
FYI, old Arch Linux Installer project deleted, the git repo is now enlisted as part of Arch Linux project. I've also added a couple of missing git repos from projects.archlinux.org
I'm unlisting the CVS repo for community from Arch Linux Packages because it blocks SVN repos to be synced.
Whenever CVS server will be up and running - let me know so I can add it.
Hmm http://www.ohloh.net/p/arch-linux/contributors is odd. Something doesn't seem right there.
What do you mean? This project tracks only repos from projects.archlinux.org (except homedir projects, autowifi and aur) Packages are tracked by Arch Linux Packages project. -- Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич)
participants (4)
-
Aaron Griffin
-
Dan McGee
-
Dieter Plaetinck
-
Roman Kyrylych