[arch-dev-public] db-5.1 rebuild
Hi, Time to move on to the next rebuild! This time it is for db-5.1. There are the following soname changes: libdb-4.8.so -> libdb-5.1.so libdb-4.so -> libdb-5.so libdb_cxx-4.8.so -> libdb_cxx-5.1.so libdb_cxx-4.so -> libdb_cxx-5.so It is a relatively small rebuild of 39 packages. I never got around to the db-5.0 update but that is a good thing as many pieces of software check for a db major version >= 4 and minor version
= 1 when they just want db>=4.1... Now we have db-5.1 we do not have to fix that stupidness. As always, more evidence that laziness pays off.
I have pushed the db update to [staging] and will work on the rest of [core] later tonight (unless someone beats me to it...) Allan
Le mardi 19 octobre 2010 00:58:04, Allan McRae a écrit :
Hi,
Time to move on to the next rebuild! This time it is for db-5.1.
There are the following soname changes: libdb-4.8.so -> libdb-5.1.so libdb-4.so -> libdb-5.so libdb_cxx-4.8.so -> libdb_cxx-5.1.so libdb_cxx-4.so -> libdb_cxx-5.so
It is a relatively small rebuild of 39 packages.
I never got around to the db-5.0 update but that is a good thing as many pieces of software check for a db major version >= 4 and minor version
= 1 when they just want db>=4.1... Now we have db-5.1 we do not have
to fix that stupidness. As always, more evidence that laziness pays off.
I have pushed the db update to [staging] and will work on the rest of [core] later tonight (unless someone beats me to it...)
Allan
I am rebuilding ruby, xemacs, openldap and gift-openft. Stéphane
On Tuesday 19 October 2010 16:21:38 Stéphane Gaudreault wrote:
I am rebuilding ruby, xemacs, openldap and gift-openft. Stéphane please try to fix/implement the two bugs[1][2] about xemacs when you rebuild it.
[1] https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/20977 [2] https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/21148 -- Andrea Scarpino Arch Linux Developer
Le mardi 19 octobre 2010 10:50:18, Andrea Scarpino a écrit :
On Tuesday 19 October 2010 16:21:38 Stéphane Gaudreault wrote:
I am rebuilding ruby, xemacs, openldap and gift-openft.
Stéphane please try to fix/implement the two bugs[1][2] about xemacs when you rebuild it.
[1] https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/20977 [2] https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/21148
I will look at that. Thank you for the info. Stéphane
On 19/10/10 14:58, Allan McRae wrote:
Hi,
Time to move on to the next rebuild! This time it is for db-5.1.
There are the following soname changes: libdb-4.8.so -> libdb-5.1.so libdb-4.so -> libdb-5.so libdb_cxx-4.8.so -> libdb_cxx-5.1.so libdb_cxx-4.so -> libdb_cxx-5.so
It is a relatively small rebuild of 39 packages.
<snip> I am having difficultly getting subversion to use db5 instead of db4 but I am not exactly sure why it is not being detected... If someone has time on their hands then I would appreciate if they take a look at getting this to work. Allan
On Wednesday 20 October 2010 09:19:02 Allan McRae wrote:
I am having difficultly getting subversion to use db5 instead of db4 but I am not exactly sure why it is not being detected... If someone has time on their hands then I would appreciate if they take a look at getting this to work. I committed a working subversion's PKGBUILD which uses db 5.1. I am building it for x86_64 now.
-- Andrea Scarpino Arch Linux Developer
On 19/10/10 14:58, Allan McRae wrote:
Hi,
Time to move on to the next rebuild! This time it is for db-5.1.
There are the following soname changes: libdb-4.8.so -> libdb-5.1.so libdb-4.so -> libdb-5.so libdb_cxx-4.8.so -> libdb_cxx-5.1.so libdb_cxx-4.so -> libdb_cxx-5.so
It is a relatively small rebuild of 39 packages.
We only have the various openoffice packages left to go: go-openoffice openoffice-base openoffice-base-beta openoffice-base-devel That is close enough to done that I will move this rebuild from [staging] at the weekend regardless of their status. Allan
Am Thu, 28 Oct 2010 14:29:54 +1000 schrieb "Allan McRae" <allan@archlinux.org>:
We only have the various openoffice packages left to go:
go-openoffice openoffice-base openoffice-base-beta openoffice-base-devel
That is close enough to done that I will move this rebuild from [staging] at the weekend regardless of their status.
Allan
Move all to testing and then I'll do the missing rebuilds. LibO will probably also need rebuild. -Andy
On 30/10/10 05:59, Andreas Radke wrote:
Am Thu, 28 Oct 2010 14:29:54 +1000 schrieb "Allan McRae"<allan@archlinux.org>:
We only have the various openoffice packages left to go:
go-openoffice openoffice-base openoffice-base-beta openoffice-base-devel
That is close enough to done that I will move this rebuild from [staging] at the weekend regardless of their status.
Allan
Move all to testing and then I'll do the missing rebuilds. LibO will probably also need rebuild.
Rebuild is in [testing] now. It appears that libreoffice does not need a rebuild. Allan
Am Sat, 30 Oct 2010 11:27:48 +1000 schrieb Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>:
Rebuild is in [testing] now. It appears that libreoffice does not need a rebuild.
Allan
[andyrtr@workstation64 trunk]$ soffice /usr/lib/ooo-3.3/program/soffice.bin: error while loading shared libraries: libdb-4.8.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory I'm on it. It may take a few days. -Andy
Vanilla OOo and OOo-beta(3.3.0 RC3 - short before final release) have been rebuilt. The devel pkg should not be a showstoppper and will follow later. Go-OOo and LibOOo have a build issue after the mono update. Go-OOo isn't supported anymore upstream and LibO so far doesn't have a stable release. I'm on it and in contact with upstream devs but shouldn't hold back the db move. Feel free to move the db stuff. -Andy
participants (4)
-
Allan McRae
-
Andrea Scarpino
-
Andreas Radke
-
Stéphane Gaudreault