[arch-dev-public] frostwire in unstable
Hi, Any reason why frostwire is always in 'unstable' ? Could it be moved to extra, or maybe even community? Thanks, Varun
Sunday 30 December 2007, Varun Acharya wrote: | Hi, | Any reason why frostwire is always in 'unstable' ? Could it be | moved to extra, or maybe even community? | | Thanks, | Varun i dont knwo what it is even. if you do and you consider it stable, it can be moved i think. - D -- .·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´ ° ° ° ° ° ° ><((((º> ° ° ° ° ° <º)))>< <º)))><
On Dec 30, 2007 8:49 AM, Damir Perisa
Sunday 30 December 2007, Varun Acharya wrote: | Hi, | Any reason why frostwire is always in 'unstable' ? Could it be | moved to extra, or maybe even community? | | Thanks, | Varun
i dont knwo what it is even. if you do and you consider it stable, it can be moved i think.
- D
tomk seems to be maintaining it currently. What do you think tomk? Varun
Varun Acharya wrote:
tomk seems to be maintaining it currently. What do you think tomk?
I was planning to revisit this whenever I packaged the next upstream release, so now's as good a time as any. Previous thoughts on this subject here: http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=262971#p262971 Last few releases have been consistent, so my plan is to move it back up to extra. T.
On Dec 31, 2007 4:20 AM, Tom K
I was planning to revisit this whenever I packaged the next upstream release, so now's as good a time as any. Previous thoughts on this subject here:
http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=262971#p262971
Last few releases have been consistent, so my plan is to move it back up to extra.
T.
Hadn't seen that post, thanks for the update. Varun
participants (3)
-
Damir Perisa
-
Tom K
-
Varun Acharya