[arch-dev-public] [signoff] openssl 0.9.8m-2 (critical)
Hi all, A change in openssl triggered a problem in at least encfs which might lead to data loss but at least results in unmountable encfs containers. See http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/18564 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi- bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=571810 and the upstream commit: http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=19336 I did some basic testing and it still passes the test suite. I ask you to sign this off soon as this might be quite critical to at least those who use encfs. Greetings, Pierre -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 4:37 PM, Pierre Schmitz <pierre@archlinux.de> wrote:
Hi all,
A change in openssl triggered a problem in at least encfs which might lead to data loss but at least results in unmountable encfs containers.
See http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/18564 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi- bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=571810 and the upstream commit: http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=19336
I did some basic testing and it still passes the test suite. I ask you to sign this off soon as this might be quite critical to at least those who use encfs.
Signoff i686
On 03/04/10 at 07:49pm, Dan McGee wrote:
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 4:37 PM, Pierre Schmitz <pierre@archlinux.de> wrote:
Hi all,
A change in openssl triggered a problem in at least encfs which might lead to data loss but at least results in unmountable encfs containers.
See http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/18564 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi- bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=571810 and the upstream commit: http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=19336
I did some basic testing and it still passes the test suite. I ask you to sign this off soon as this might be quite critical to at least those who use encfs.
Signoff i686
signoff i686 --
On 03/04/10 at 07:56pm, Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227) wrote:
On 03/04/10 at 07:49pm, Dan McGee wrote:
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 4:37 PM, Pierre Schmitz <pierre@archlinux.de> wrote:
Hi all,
A change in openssl triggered a problem in at least encfs which might lead to data loss but at least results in unmountable encfs containers.
See http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/18564 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi- bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=571810 and the upstream commit: http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=19336
I did some basic testing and it still passes the test suite. I ask you to sign this off soon as this might be quite critical to at least those who use encfs.
Signoff i686
signoff i686 -- And another one for x86_64 --
participants (3)
-
Dan McGee
-
Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227)
-
Pierre Schmitz