Aaron Griffin wrote:

On Nov 6, 2007 11:57 AM, Alexander Baldeck wrote:

...

I'm also in the middle of finding packages that need to be rebuilt against xulrunner etc. Please send me lists of packages we need to rebuild to get a proper howto up. :)

Because I'm confused - did you mean xulrunner packages, or packages for the opt->usr change?

Only xulrunner packages. That would include: epiphany galeon vlc (?) and the like. Cheers, -G

Tuesday 06 November 2007, Andreas Radke wrote: | Am Tue, 06 Nov 2007 18:57:55 +0100 | | schrieb Alexander Baldeck : | > Hey all, | > | > I just begun rebuilding mozilla packages to reside below /usr | > instead of /opt/mozilla. You can find them here: | > | > [mozilla] | > Server = http://archlinux.org/~alexander/mozilla | > | > I'm also in the middle of finding packages that need to be | > rebuilt against xulrunner etc. Please send me lists of packages | > we need to rebuild to get a proper howto up. :) | > | > Cheers, | > | > -X | > | > _______________________________________________ | > arch-dev-public mailing list | > arch-dev-public@archlinux.org | > http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-dev-public | | running find-deps on cvs-extra shows: | | [andyrtr@workstation64 extra]$ sh | /home/daten/arch64/cvs/arch/scripts/find-deps xulrunner | ./lib/swt/PKGBUILD -- makedepends[@] xulrunner | ./lib/gecko-sharp-2.0/PKGBUILD -- depends[@] xulrunner>=1.8.1 | ./lib/gnome-python-extras/PKGBUILD -- makedepends[@] xulrunner | ./lib/gecko-sharp/PKGBUILD -- depends[@] xulrunner>=1.8.1 | ./devel/gcc-gcj/PKGBUILD -- makedepends[@] xulrunner | ./gnome/yelp/PKGBUILD -- depends[@] xulrunner>=1.8.1.6 | ./gnome/deskbar-applet/PKGBUILD -- makedepends[@] | xulrunner>=1.8.1.8 ./gnome/devhelp/PKGBUILD -- depends[@] | xulrunner>=1.8.1.8 ./gnome/totem/PKGBUILD -- makedepends[@] | xulrunner>=1.8.1.6 ./gnome/totem-xine/PKGBUILD -- makedepends[@] | xulrunner>=1.8.1.6 ./gnome/totem-plugin/PKGBUILD -- makedepends[@] | xulrunner>=1.8.1.6 ./gnome/epiphany/PKGBUILD -- depends[@] | xulrunner>=1.8.1.8 ./multimedia/mplayer-plugin/PKGBUILD -- | makedepends[@] xulrunner>=1.8.1.5 ./network/liferea/PKGBUILD -- | depends[@] xulrunner>=1.8.1.3 ./network/galeon/PKGBUILD -- | depends[@] xulrunner>=1.8.1.3 ./office/openoffice-base/PKGBUILD -- | makedepends[@] xulrunner>=1.8.1.3 | | | Andy i like the output of your find-deps script. the one i use does not really output the string (with version number) but only the list of pkgs. would you mind sharing your script? thanx in advance, Damir -- .·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´ ° ° ° ° ° ° ><((((º> ° ° ° ° ° <º)))>< <º)))><

On Tue, 6 Nov 2007 18:07:37 -0600 "Aaron Griffin" wrote:

On Nov 6, 2007 5:56 PM, Damir Perisa wrote:

...

i like the output of your find-deps script. the one i use does not really output the string (with version number) but only the list of pkgs. would you mind sharing your script? thanx in advance,

Maybe it's worth inclusion in devtools?

Looks like the script I've posted to the list a couple times now already. One of you guys spruced it up and re-sent it, and this is the updated version. Basically it's been sent to the list probably 3 or 4 times now. XD I've attached it here. Again. Same disclaimer as before: it sources PKGBUILD files, so don't use it on PKGBUILDs that may contain wanton rm -rf / commands. -- Travis

On Tue, 6 Nov 2007 18:20:21 -0600 "Aaron Griffin" wrote:

On Nov 6, 2007 6:15 PM, Travis Willard wrote:

...

On Tue, 6 Nov 2007 18:07:37 -0600 "Aaron Griffin" wrote:

...

On Nov 6, 2007 5:56 PM, Damir Perisa wrote:

...

i like the output of your find-deps script. the one i use does not really output the string (with version number) but only the list of pkgs. would you mind sharing your script? thanx in advance,

Maybe it's worth inclusion in devtools?

Looks like the script I've posted to the list a couple times now already. One of you guys spruced it up and re-sent it, and this is the updated version. Basically it's been sent to the list probably 3 or 4 times now. XD

I know. I'm just reiterating. To phrase it as Dan would "patches welcome". Hah

Fair enough - my comment on how it's been to the list a ton was more directed at Damir, who asked for the script to be shared. :P But regardless, it's there to be used, I don't mind attaching it to emails. :D Would a patch-format against the devtools tree actually be that much better than just the script itself?

Am Wed, 7 Nov 2007 03:00:57 +0100 schrieb Damir Perisa :

Wednesday 07 November 2007, Travis Willard wrote: | Looks like the script I've posted to the list a couple times now | already.  One of you guys spruced it up and re-sent it, and this | is the updated version.  Basically it's been sent to the list | probably 3 or 4 times now.  XD

ah, thanx.

... we should put it somewhere (as already suggested - devtools for example) and start instrumentalising it instead of resending it :)

- D

I took the old one in cvs-arch/scripts ;) Andy