[arch-dev-public] Anyone want to adopt vpnc?
I used to use this on a daily basis, but I now have zero use for it (and zero ability to test it). Anyone actually use this? It's pretty low maintenance -- I was pulling snapshots from svn/git with some bash voodoo I left in the PKGBUILD to generate snapshots. Two repos you say? svn because vpnc seems to refuse to tag a new release, and the repo is varying states of quiet to silent. git because an Intel employee actively maintains the shell scripts used on post-connect (/etc/vpnc/vpnc-script). I'll give this a week before dropping it to the AUR. d
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Dave Reisner <d@falconindy.com> wrote:
I used to use this on a daily basis, but I now have zero use for it (and zero ability to test it). Anyone actually use this? It's pretty low maintenance -- I was pulling snapshots from svn/git with some bash voodoo I left in the PKGBUILD to generate snapshots.
Two repos you say? svn because vpnc seems to refuse to tag a new release, and the repo is varying states of quiet to silent. git because an Intel employee actively maintains the shell scripts used on post-connect (/etc/vpnc/vpnc-script).
I'll give this a week before dropping it to the AUR.
d
FTR, vpnc is used by a couple of packages: archboot networkmanager-vpnc openconnect so it will need to stay in the repos unless we also remove or update the dependencies of these packages.
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 10:54:59PM -0400, Eric Bélanger wrote:
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Dave Reisner <d@falconindy.com> wrote:
I used to use this on a daily basis, but I now have zero use for it (and zero ability to test it). Anyone actually use this? It's pretty low maintenance -- I was pulling snapshots from svn/git with some bash voodoo I left in the PKGBUILD to generate snapshots.
Two repos you say? svn because vpnc seems to refuse to tag a new release, and the repo is varying states of quiet to silent. git because an Intel employee actively maintains the shell scripts used on post-connect (/etc/vpnc/vpnc-script).
I'll give this a week before dropping it to the AUR.
d
FTR, vpnc is used by a couple of packages: archboot networkmanager-vpnc openconnect
so it will need to stay in the repos unless we also remove or update the dependencies of these packages.
Uggh... I guess that means Ionut wants to take vpnc, since he maintains openconnect ;). Alternatively, there's no real issue with leaving vpnc in extra -- it just means it isn't going to be touched unless someone asks me to. d
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 11:21:45PM -0400, Dave Reisner wrote:
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 10:54:59PM -0400, Eric Bélanger wrote:
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Dave Reisner <d@falconindy.com> wrote:
I used to use this on a daily basis, but I now have zero use for it (and zero ability to test it). Anyone actually use this? It's pretty low maintenance -- I was pulling snapshots from svn/git with some bash voodoo I left in the PKGBUILD to generate snapshots.
Two repos you say? svn because vpnc seems to refuse to tag a new release, and the repo is varying states of quiet to silent. git because an Intel employee actively maintains the shell scripts used on post-connect (/etc/vpnc/vpnc-script).
I'll give this a week before dropping it to the AUR.
d
FTR, vpnc is used by a couple of packages: archboot networkmanager-vpnc openconnect
so it will need to stay in the repos unless we also remove or update the dependencies of these packages.
Uggh... I guess that means Ionut wants to take vpnc, since he maintains openconnect ;). Alternatively, there's no real issue with leaving vpnc in extra -- it just means it isn't going to be touched unless someone asks me to.
d
I use vpnc to connect to my work network, weekly or at least monthly and would be happy to maintain it if you could drop it to [community]. -- Jonathan Steel
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 08:48:56AM +0100, Jonathan Steel wrote:
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 11:21:45PM -0400, Dave Reisner wrote:
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 10:54:59PM -0400, Eric Bélanger wrote:
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Dave Reisner <d@falconindy.com> wrote:
I used to use this on a daily basis, but I now have zero use for it (and zero ability to test it). Anyone actually use this? It's pretty low maintenance -- I was pulling snapshots from svn/git with some bash voodoo I left in the PKGBUILD to generate snapshots.
Two repos you say? svn because vpnc seems to refuse to tag a new release, and the repo is varying states of quiet to silent. git because an Intel employee actively maintains the shell scripts used on post-connect (/etc/vpnc/vpnc-script).
I'll give this a week before dropping it to the AUR.
d
FTR, vpnc is used by a couple of packages: archboot networkmanager-vpnc openconnect
so it will need to stay in the repos unless we also remove or update the dependencies of these packages.
Uggh... I guess that means Ionut wants to take vpnc, since he maintains openconnect ;). Alternatively, there's no real issue with leaving vpnc in extra -- it just means it isn't going to be touched unless someone asks me to.
d
I use vpnc to connect to my work network, weekly or at least monthly and would be happy to maintain it if you could drop it to [community].
-- Jonathan Steel
I've already got an offer to move it to [community], but there's packages in [extra] which depend on it. In order to respect the repo hierarchy, vpnc needs to remain in [extra] unless those other packages are moved to [community] as well. d
participants (3)
-
Dave Reisner
-
Eric Bélanger
-
Jonathan Steel