On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, Dan McGee wrote:

Pacman 3.2.0 is in testing for i686. Please signoff. Changes outlined here: http://projects.archlinux.org/?p=pacman.git;a=blob;f=NEWS

When building mythbrowser, I noticed that makepkg now fails when there is an '?' in the sources, e.g. source=("http://www.mythtv.org/modules.php?name=Downloads&d_op=getit&lid=136&foo=/mythplugins-$pkgver.tar.bz2") Removing the double quotes and escaping the characters doesn't work. The error message: ==> ERROR: There is no agent set up to handle URLs. Check /etc/makepkg.conf. Aborting... Not a showstopper as the source can be downloaded maunally in the build dir. I'll try to look into it further tomorrow. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.

Am Wed, 30 Jul 2008 20:44:22 -0500 schrieb "Dan McGee" :

Pacman 3.2.0 is in testing for i686. Please signoff. Changes outlined here: http://projects.archlinux.org/?p=pacman.git;a=blob;f=NEWS

Can someone build it for x86_64? Thanks.

On a side note, I'm gone for most of this upcoming weekend, so you may want to wait until next week to move this to core even if it has the requisite signoffs unless you guys want to put out any fires.

-Dan

Is there a certain reason why pacman.static has been removed? I used it a lot when playing with glibc upgrades that often break the dynamic pacman. Is there any replacement? -Andy

On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 11:37 AM, Travis Willard wrote:

On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Andreas Radke wrote:

...

Is there a certain reason why pacman.static has been removed? I used it a lot when playing with glibc upgrades that often break the dynamic pacman. Is there any replacement?

It also ended up being pretty useful when pacman started linking against libarchive and libdownload (libfetch?), IIRC - of course, that was compounded by a pacman issue (it didn't download its own deps when upgrading itself) that has since been fixed.

(replying to myself, I know) Looked up the related thread in the pacman-dev archives (since I knew there'd be one. :P) It was a short thread, but Dan makes a good point: "Yeah, I think it has always been one of those "I hope it works" type things. In any case, I think this is more appropriate for the pacman PKGBUILD if we truely want a static build, rather than in the pacman buildchain." Does the PKGBUILD do this? Should it?

Am Wed, 30 Jul 2008 20:44:22 -0500 schrieb "Dan McGee" :

Pacman 3.2.0 is in testing for i686. Please signoff. Changes outlined here: http://projects.archlinux.org/?p=pacman.git;a=blob;f=NEWS

Can someone build it for x86_64? Thanks.

On a side note, I'm gone for most of this upcoming weekend, so you may want to wait until next week to move this to core even if it has the requisite signoffs unless you guys want to put out any fires.

-Dan

Pacman fails now often to fetch packages from my local mirror though the files are present there: [root@workstation64 /]# LANG=C pacman -Syu :: Synchronizing package databases... testing is up to date core is up to date extra is up to date :: Starting full system upgrade... :: Replace kde-common with extra/kdebase-workspace? [Y/n] resolving dependencies... looking for inter-conflicts... Remove (1): kde-common-4.1.0-2 Total Removed Size: 0.01 MB Targets (26): qt-4.4.1-1 phonon-4.2.0-2 raptor-1.4.18-1 redland-1.0.8-1 soprano-2.1.1-1 kdelibs-4.1.0-4 gcc-libs-4.3.1-3 rarian-0.8.0-2 lame-3.98-1 a52dec-0.7.4-4 faad2-2.6.1-1 libmp4v2-1.6-1 faac-1.26-1 xvidcore-1.1.3-1 libid3tag-0.15.1b-2 imlib2-1.4.1-1 x264-20080625-1 ffmpeg-20080715-3 xine-lib-1.1.14-2 kdebase-runtime-4.1.0-2 kdebase-workspace-4.1.0-4 gcc-4.3.1-3 hunspell-1.2.6-1 ttf-dejavu-2.26-1 xulrunner-1.9.0.1-2 zip-3.0-1 Total Download Size: 163.84 MB Total Installed Size: 433.84 MB Proceed with installation? [Y/n] :: Retrieving packages from core... gcc-4.3.1-3-i686 23.7M 52.1M/s 00:00:00 [#########################################################################################################################] 100% :: Retrieving packages from extra... raptor-1.4.18-1-i686 390.8K 15.0M/s 00:00:00 [#########################################################################################################################] 100% error: failed retrieving file 'redland-1.0.8-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz' from 192.168.0.90 : Command okay redland-1.0.8-1-i686 547.2K 367.6K/s 00:00:01 [#########################################################################################################################] 100% soprano-2.1.1-1-i686 2.2M 22.9M/s 00:00:00 [#########################################################################################################################] 100% error: failed retrieving file 'rarian-0.8.0-2-i686.pkg.tar.gz' from 192.168.0.90 : Command okay rarian-0.8.0-2-i686 163.3K 187.2K/s 00:00:01 [#########################################################################################################################] 100% [testing] Server = ftp://192.168.0.90/mirror/packages/i686/testing/ Include = /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist changing to XferCommand = /usr/bin/wget --passive-ftp -c -O %o %u seems to fix it. Any idea? -Andy

On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 2:01 AM, Eric Belanger wrote:

On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, Dan McGee wrote:

...

Pacman 3.2.0 is in testing for i686. Please signoff. Changes outlined here: http://projects.archlinux.org/?p=pacman.git;a=blob;f=NEWS

When building mythbrowser, I noticed that makepkg now fails when there is an '?' in the sources, e.g. source=("http://www.mythtv.org/modules.php?name=Downloads&d_op=getit&lid=136&foo=/mythplugins-$pkgver.tar.bz2")

Removing the double quotes and escaping the characters doesn't work.

The error message:

==> ERROR: There is no agent set up to handle URLs. Check /etc/makepkg.conf. Aborting...

Not a showstopper as the source can be downloaded maunally in the build dir. I'll try to look into it further tomorrow.

So did we get any signoffs here? I am aware of a few regressions that we have patches available for and will be fixed in a soon-to-come 3.2.1 release, but I don't believe either of them are absolute showstoppers: 1. The above makepkg ? URL regression. http://projects.archlinux.org/?p=pacman.git;a=commit;h=9bc799ec7b1718e6d90ce... 2. local mirror behavior with display and trailing slashes. http://projects.archlinux.org/?p=pacman.git;a=commit;h=4476598e4e128f4595d53..., http://projects.archlinux.org/?p=pacman.git;a=commit;h=72c5a298a3ee0f1801901... 3. The manpages were incorrectly built/included, although they should be close to up to date, they simply include a git version number. (d'oh! me again). http://archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2008-August/012739.html Anyone want to signoff? -Dan

Am Mittwoch 06 August 2008 schrieb Eric Belanger:

On Tue, 5 Aug 2008, Dan McGee wrote:

...

On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 2:01 AM, Eric Belanger

wrote:

...

On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, Dan McGee wrote:

...

Pacman 3.2.0 is in testing for i686. Please signoff. Changes outlined here: http://projects.archlinux.org/?p=pacman.git;a=blob;f=NEWS

When building mythbrowser, I noticed that makepkg now fails when there is an '?' in the sources, e.g. source=("http://www.mythtv.org/modules.php?name=Downloads&d_op=getit&lid =136&foo=/mythplugins-$pkgver.tar.bz2")

Removing the double quotes and escaping the characters doesn't work.

The error message:

==> ERROR: There is no agent set up to handle URLs. Check /etc/makepkg.conf. Aborting...

Not a showstopper as the source can be downloaded maunally in the build dir. I'll try to look into it further tomorrow.

So did we get any signoffs here? I am aware of a few regressions that we have patches available for and will be fixed in a soon-to-come 3.2.1 release, but I don't believe either of them are absolute showstoppers: 1. The above makepkg ? URL regression. http://projects.archlinux.org/?p=pacman.git;a=commit;h=9bc799ec7b1718e6d9 0ceedd5e08672068e26e10 2. local mirror behavior with display and trailing slashes. http://projects.archlinux.org/?p=pacman.git;a=commit;h=4476598e4e128f4595 d5383ecb51a9576a447b5b, http://projects.archlinux.org/?p=pacman.git;a=commit;h=72c5a298a3ee0f1801 9010ef2eb43da654ec25f8 3. The manpages were incorrectly built/included, although they should be close to up to date, they simply include a git version number. (d'oh! me again). http://archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2008-August/012739.html

Anyone want to signoff?

-Dan

OK then. Signoff for both arches. signoff both arches

-- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tpowa@archlinux.org