Re: [arch-dev-public] Freshen Arch's Graphical Identity (Logo)
Jason Chu wrote:
On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 07:43:40PM -0700, eliott wrote:
I am all for a competition, but I don't know about community vote.
How about community submissions, and voted on by the Arch devs, and TUs?
I don't want to be represented by a piece of talking poop or anything.. though..i might vote for that.
I mean...hey... talking poop.
Did this post of mine even make sense? *head scratching*
I'd like to hear what the community thought, but not necessarily go with what they choose.
If we switch the logo, I think we should consider having a trademark search run on our final design(s) and getting our trademark registered. As we grow, I think we'd like to have some protection against people telling us we can't use our logo. - P
On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 09:17:03 -0400 Paul Mattal <paul@mattal.com> wrote:
Jason Chu wrote:
On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 07:43:40PM -0700, eliott wrote:
I am all for a competition, but I don't know about community vote.
How about community submissions, and voted on by the Arch devs, and TUs?
I don't want to be represented by a piece of talking poop or anything.. though..i might vote for that.
I mean...hey... talking poop.
Did this post of mine even make sense? *head scratching*
I'd like to hear what the community thought, but not necessarily go with what they choose.
If we switch the logo, I think we should consider having a trademark search run on our final design(s) and getting our trademark registered.
As we grow, I think we'd like to have some protection against people telling us we can't use our logo.
+1 Good call on this one - does anyone know the process for this in the US/Canada? How do Trademarks work? I'm clueless. -- Travis
participants (2)
-
Paul Mattal
-
Travis Willard